Anglo-Persian capture of Qeshm

The Capture of Qeshm was a combined Anglo-Persian expedition that successfully captured the Portuguese garrison at Qeshm Island after months of siege.

Capture of Qeshm
Part of Safavid–Portuguese conflicts

Portuguese fortress of Qeshm
DateJune 1621 – February 1622
Location
Result Anglo-Persian victory
Territorial
changes
Qeshm annexed to Persia
Belligerents
Safavid Persia
East India Company
Portugal
Commanders and leaders
Imam Quli Khan
Abdullah Hussain Khan
Edward Monnox
William Baffin 
Rui Freire de Andrade
Strength
25,000 Persians
400 boats
9 English ships
3,000 men
Casualties and losses
Heavy Heavy

Background

edit

Philip III of Spain took measures to maintain the Iberian supremacy of Persian Gulf.[1] In January 1619,[2] he dispatched two naval squadrons to the region; one of them, led by Rui Freire de Andrade, left Lisbon with clear orders to drive the English off and secure Hormuz Island from a possible Persian attack. The force under Rui consisted of two galleons and three small vessels carrying 2,000 soldiers and 178 guns. He reached Hormuz in June 1620.[3]

In December 1620, Shah Abbas tried to reassure the Portuguese about his dealings with the English, but the Portuguese in Goa realized that the English would not abandon their trade in the Persian Gulf region. A battle broke out on January 7, 1621, off Jask between Rui and an English fleet of four vessels, in which the English had the upper hand. After this defeat, Rui turned to his second objective, securing Hormuz from Persian invasion.[4]

To achieve this, Rui had to build a fortress on Qeshm Island to secure the water supply to Hormuz. This project came at an unfortunate moment; the construction of a Portuguese fort in Qeshm provided an excuse for the Persians to attack the Portuguese. Shah Abbas protested against such action at Hormuz. Rui was warned of such action by Fernao de Albuquerque, the governor of India, or by Luis de Sousa, the captain of Hormuz. However, Rui ignored the warnings and insisted on building a fort, and this proved to be his first mistake.[5]

Prelude

edit

On May 7, 1621,[6] a Portuguese force of 2,000 men, supported by 1,000 Hormuzi soldiers, defeated the Persians there who attempted to oppose them.[7] The Persians then assembled an army of 25,000 men, reinforced by 400 Arab boats, on the Persian coast. The Persians were led by Abdullah Hussain Khan, who had been sent by Imam Quli Khan who had been placed in charge of the campaign by Shah Abbas. While Rui was working on the construction, two galleons from Goa arrived ostensibly to assist him. The galleons were commanded by Manuel de Azevedo and John de Silveira. These two were rivals of Rui and brought instructions to moderate his aggression. Later, these two captains left the island.[8]

Thereafter, Rui began raiding and sacking coastal cities such as Kong, Jask, and Julfar where he committed atrocities that caused outrage among the coastal tribes of Persia and Arabia instead of gaining the support of these inhabitants.[9][10]

Capture

edit
 
Persian depiction of a battle scene between Persians and Portuguese

The Persian besieged Qeshm for about nine months from June 1621 until February 1622, they sustained heavy casualties in several assaults and all of their efforts were proved to be in vain: the Persian commanders realized the fort would not fall unless they controlled the surrounding sea lanes.[11] They decided to ask the English to assist them in the siege and a force of nine English vessels arrived at Jask from Surat on 26 December 1621, Imam Quli Khan used this opportunity to exert pressure on the English. He demanded that they help him in exchange for rewards but, at the same time, he threatened to withdraw all English trading privileges in Persia.

Rui ordered a Portuguese attack on Jask that destroyed the English station, this proved to be his second mistake, as it increased English hostility against them.[12][13][14]

In spite of all this, the English agent in Persia, Edward Monnox, agreed to help. The English joined the siege of Qeshm in January 1622. Negotiations were held between Monnox and Rui at which Rui reminded Monnox that he was giving support to the Moors against Christian forces. Monnox reminded Rui of the destruction of the English station at Jask. These talks brought no solution: Rui refused to surrender, and the fortress was bombarded with little effect. However, the garrison, with the encouragement of its priests, rebelled against their leader and surrendered the fort in February 1622.[15][16]

Rui was sent with his men to Surat as a prisoner but managed to escape to Muscat. The Lascarins' auxiliaries' fates were unfortunate; the Persians first promised them safety, but Khan massacred them like "a flock of sheep." Both sides broke the terms of surrender.[17][18]

Aftermath

edit

The fall of Qeshm to the English-Persian alliance was important because of Qeshm's role as a storehouse of products to supply Hormuz. In addition, its fall was the first step toward precipitating a crisis in Hormuz because it deprived the garrison and inhabitants of Hormuz of one of their sources of water.[19]

Bibliography

edit
  • Mohammed Hameed Salman, Aspects Of Portuguese Rule In The Arabian Gulf, 1521–1622.[1]
  • Salim Abdul Ali al-'Areedh, Islamic rulings and their practical applications in British India and the Arabian Gulf.[2]
  • QESHM ISLAND, Encyclopaedia Iranica

References

edit
  1. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 227
  2. ^ Encyclopaedia Iranica
  3. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 227
  4. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 227-8
  5. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 228-9
  6. ^ Encyclopaedia Iranica
  7. ^ Encyclopaedia Iranica
  8. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 229-30
  9. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 230
  10. ^ Salim Abdul Ali al-'Areedh, p. 41
  11. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 230
  12. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 230-1
  13. ^ Encyclopaedia Iranica
  14. ^ Salim Abdul Ali al-'Areedh, p. 41
  15. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 232-3
  16. ^ Salim Abdul Ali al-'Areedh, p. 41
  17. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 233
  18. ^ Salim Abdul Ali al-'Areedh, p. 41-2
  19. ^ Mohammed Hameed Salman, p. 233