Wikipedia

After the Ball (Kirk and Madsen book)

After the Ball: How America Will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s is a 1989 book about LGBT rights in the United States by the neuropsychologist Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen. The book has been described as advocating the use of propaganda to advance the cause of gay rights, and has been criticized by social conservatives as an expression of the "homosexual agenda".

After the Ball: How America Will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90s
Cover of the first edition
AuthorsMarshall Kirk
Hunter Madsen
LanguageEnglish
SubjectLGBT rights in the United States
PublisherDoubleday
Publication date
1989
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (Hardcover and Paperback)
Pages398
ISBN0-385-23906-8

Summary

edit

Kirk and Madsen argued that, at the time they were writing, the gay movement had to a large extent been unsuccessful, and that some of the limited victories it had won were in danger of being overturned.

They also put forward a new agenda to advance the cause of gay rights.[1]

Publication history

edit

After the Ball was first published in 1989 by Doubleday.[2]

Reception

edit

After the Ball received a positive review from the historian Jonathan Kirsch in the Los Angeles Times. Kirsch described the book as "a curious call to the story boards and 30-second spots of Madison Avenue, a kind of sanitized upscale media radicalism", and noted that its authors admitted that they advocated propaganda. He described their proposals about how gay people should be depicted in the media as "propaganda on the highest levels of insight and calculation." He credited them with providing, "a wide-ranging and penetrating survey" of negative attitudes to gay people and homosexuality. Though he considered the book "uncomfortable" and believed that it contained rhetorical excesses, he wrote that he came to admire and enjoy it because its authors' provocative ideas and spirited language. He also noted that the book's graphic design was elegant and handsome.[3]

The book was also reviewed by Christopher Brown in Christopher Street and Mary A. Hartshorne in JAMA.[4][5] According to the New York Native, the book became a bestseller in the United States.[6]

In The New American, a magazine associated with the John Birch Society, William F. Jasper described After the Ball as one of "the most influential manifestos of the militant homosexuals". In his view, it "delineated an insidious, Orwellian propaganda program".[7] Craig Osten, an author associated with the Alliance Defense Fund, criticized After the Ball in an interview on the Focus on the Family website CitizenLink, writing that the book revealed the agenda of "homosexual activists", and that its authors "admit that the use of lies is perfectly fine in their struggle."[8] Osten stated:

It is an agenda that they basically set in the late 1980s, in a book called 'After the Ball,' where they laid out a six-point plan for how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior — in a decade-long time frame.... They admit it privately, but they will not say that publicly. In their private publications, homosexual activists make it very clear that there is an agenda. The six-point agenda that they laid out in 1989 was explicit: Talk about gays and gayness as loudly and as often as possible... Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers... Give homosexual protectors a just cause... (to exploit the sense of fairness)... Make gays look good... Make the victimizers look bad... Get funds from corporate America.[9]

Joe Wenke noted in HuffPost that Alan Sears and Craig Osten considered After the Ball a work used by gay rights activists to subvert American culture and were outraged at what they considered its "Machiavellian activist strategies". According to Wenke, Kirk's own assessment of the book was far more modest than that of Sears and Osten. He quoted Kirk remarking in 2006 that while the book was widely read by gay rights activists when it was first published, most of them regarded it negatively, and that while many of its techniques had been used by activists it had no current influence on them.[10] However, Robert R. Reilly argued that Kirk and Madsen's proposed strategy of portraying gay people as victims was successful. He believed that the success of this strategy was the reason why, "AIDS gets more research money per patient than any other disease."[11] The journalist Rod Dreher argued in The American Conservative that advocates of pedophilia were trying to use the propaganda strategies advocated by Kirk and Madsen to advance their cause.[12]

References

edit
  1. ^ Kirk & Madsen 1989, p. xiii.
  2. ^ Kirk & Madsen 1989, p. iv.
  3. ^ Kirsch 1989.
  4. ^ Brown 1989, pp. 43–46.
  5. ^ Hartshorne 1990, pp. 2374–2375.
  6. ^ New York Native 1989, p. 26.
  7. ^ Jasper 1998.
  8. ^ Osten 2003.
  9. ^ Osten, Craig (2003), Q&A: The Homosexual Agenda, CitizenLink, affiliate of Focus on the Family, archived from the original on 2008-06-12, retrieved 2011-03-30
  10. ^ Wenke 2013.
  11. ^ Reilly 2015, pp. 10–11.
  12. ^ Dreher 2018.

Bibliography

edit
Books
Journals
  • Brown, Christopher (1989). "Selling Homosexuality". Christopher Street. 12 (2).  – via EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
  • Hartshorne, Mary A. (1990). "After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's". JAMA. 263 (17). doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440170096048.
  • "Bestseller list". New York Native (345). 1989.  – via EBSCO's Academic Search Complete (subscription required)
Online text
Online articles
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=After_the_Ball_(Kirk_and_Madsen_book)&oldid=1247453842"