Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Further collaboration
| Main page | Articles for improvement | Article nominations | Schedule | Assessment | Accomplishments | Automation & templates | Participants | Talk page |
 | This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
 |
| This page is modeled upon Wikipedia:Peer review and the standards at Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. Two levels, Good Articles (GA) and Featured articles (FA), are assessments made by external panels, rather than by Wikiprojects. Candidates are nominated by listing them at Good article candidates and Featured article candidates. Assessments are made according to the criteria at Good article criteria and Featured article criteria, and the results are listed at Good articles and Featured articles. |
|
|
| 1 |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Welcome to the TAFI Further collaboration page, to coordinate ongoing collaborations after the project's weekly entries have occurred. Herein editors can continue to discuss and collaborate on articles for improvement, including articles that are capable of promotion to GA or FA status. Please sign entries here with four tildes ~~~~.
Please post new entries at the top of the list below. Articles with no significant collaboration in 4 weeks may be archived.