I've listed this article for peer review as strongly recommended by the article's GAR. I have addressed the issues raised in the GAR, and the GAR was passed. The reviewer noted that the article "really could do with a very thorough examination". In addition, I'm also thinking about whether we can take the article to the next level. Is it possible to work on it to FA status? Issues in the current content aside, looking at other FA's it seemed that FA's should be much longer than this? But there is only so much you can talk about an old religious document and I'm not sure if it's easy to find more sources or topic to expand the article.
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!
@HaEr48 sorry for the long time you have had to wait. This is a fascinating, well-sourced and well-written article with appropriate images. I have learned a lot by reading this and have no major concerns. I advise... dip in, and give it a go. Good luck at FA! --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:36, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
