Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.

How to propose images to the author of a wiki for evalutation?

edit

I have some good images ×10 of lichenns that I captured on my olive trees today but I don't know how to propose them.to the author. I found your name at the beginning of lichens article. Ivanmellace (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Taxobot

edit

Hi,

Around 10 years ago, you created Taxobot and registered it on Toolforge. It appears to be inactive.

In 2021, Taxobot was created on the French Wikipedia (Github). We would like to attempt deploying that tool on Toolforge under its original name. Since your Taxobot is still registered, albeit inactive, would you be open to rename / delete it on Toolforge to free up the URL for this project?

Thank you. LD (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

AA Dragons for you.

edit

🐲🐉 GinnyThomas (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
For creating User:Citation bot 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic

edit

Hello! I reverted you recent edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic. Your edit was badly formatted, and unencyclopedic. If you feel the given formula is incorrect, I encourage you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, the talk page already indicates that the forumla is incorrect. I've restored the edit in a more "encyclopaedic" format – if you feel you can improve the formatting, do please feel free to do so, but I think it's worth keeping the reference in there as in my view, it's better to have badly formatted but correct information than formulae that are perfectly formatted but with no indication that they are misleading! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics

edit

  Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your bot is amazing. Citation Bot

edit

Tremendous. Outstanding. 2800:BF0:155:E19:D75:1D68:E8FE:562A (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:-ve range

edit

 Template:-ve range has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Great appendage" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Great appendage has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 6 § Great appendage until a consensus is reached. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 09:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)Reply