Eugen Simion 14

Disambiguation link notification for March 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apollonia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Need to fix oldest images

In Japan, United States and more some locations, have a error in the date, please edit Coverage of Google Street View page to fix oldest images. 179.223.103.197 (talk) 23:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Mapillary logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mapillary logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 21:32, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

GSV coverage

Hi. The source for the Torres del Paine update is from an anonymous IP on the Google Street View in Chile article (see diff). These roads were not there when Punta Arenas was added back on 6 March, so they were definitely added some time after. I've found no media coverage of this addition, thus I'm not sure of the date. Pristino (talk) 00:58, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Would you like this page to be semi-protected?

Hi Eugen, Please let me know if you'd like this talk page to be semi-protected for a while to stop that vandal posting on it. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Oh thanks. Of course I want to stop that freaking vandal. An indefinitive protection will be great, because the vandal will strike again. Can you do something also for Coverage of Google Street View after April 30, like an indefinitive semi-proteciton?- EugεnS¡m¡on(14) ® 14:18, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

OK. Indefinite duration seems excessive (as this means that no IP editor will be able to contact you directly until the protection is lifted), but I've protected this page for a one-month period. I'd be happy to extend this if the vandal still has nothing better to do with their time after 30 days though (and have this page watchlisted). Thanks for pointing out the the protection of the article was getting close to expiring - I've just extended it considerably. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 22:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Svay Rieng and Sihanoukville. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erdene. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coverage of Google Street View, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shalimar Garden and Government College University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Request for update the file Google Street View coverage.png

Please update the following file: Google Street View coverage.png

Before

After

Please update the file to change color to light orange for Kenya. Diretor Adobe (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

ITN for 2015 Vuelta a España

--Spencer^T♦C 05:39, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2009 New Ireland earthquake

The article 2009 New Ireland earthquake has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WikiProject Earthquakes is not documenting events like this—not even in lists of earthquakes. This M6.7 event is just not notable. The area where it occurred is seismically active. Extremely active. There were no less than 21 events of M6.7 or greater during the period January 1, 2000 to present. There is nothing to write about the majority of these events.

[http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/map/#{%22feed%22%3A%221445125851100%22%2C%22search%22%3A{%22id%22%3A%221445125851100%22%2C%22name%22%3A%22Search%20Results%22%2C%22isSearch%22%3Atrue%2C%22params%22%3A{%22starttime%22%3A%222000-01-01%2000%3A00%3A00%22%2C%22maxlatitude%22%3A-2.087%2C%22minlatitude%22%3A-7.144%2C%22maxlongitude%22%3A-203.818%2C%22minlongitude%22%3A-209.224%2C%22minmagnitude%22%3A6.7%2C%22endtime%22%3A%222015-10-16%2023%3A59%3A59%22%2C%22orderby%22%3A%22time%22

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.%2C%22listFormat%22%3A%22default%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%22newest%22%2C%22basemap%22%3A%22grayscale%22%2C%22autoUpdate%22%3Afalse%2C%22restrictListToMap%22%3Atrue%2C%22timeZone%22%3A%22utc%22%2C%22mapposition%22%3A[[-13.774066408054814%2C-216.36474609375]%2C[5.725311447610156%2C-196.5673828125]]%2C%22overlays%22%3A{%22plates%22%3Atrue}%2C%22viewModes%22%3A{%22help%22%3Afalse%2C%22list%22%3Atrue%2C%22map%22%3Atrue%2C%22settings%22%3Afalse}}]}} Dawnseeker2000 23:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Romanian Football

Can you help me to improve Romanian Football ??--Alexiulian25 (talk) 20:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2015 Romanian protests

The article 2015 Romanian protests has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A near duplicate of Colectiv nightclub fire#Protests, or already copied and pasted there. Does not work as a stand-alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. George Ho (talk) 22:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Romanian protests for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Romanian protests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Romanian protests until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. George Ho (talk) 06:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

About new updates on Google street view

Sorry about last time I speak arrogantly, I hope you won't mind about that. I would like to ask 2 things, how can I know Google updated their street view and how can political problems be deal with on that Coverage of Google Street View page since I was working on the Chinese version.--owennson（Meeting Room、Certificates） 07:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Is it true that Kazakhstan has no Nazarbayev University image? Since the Kazakhstan one confused me.--owennson（Meeting Room、Certificates） 13:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Air France Flight 463

The article Air France Flight 463 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hardly notable for a stand-alone article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 13:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Air France Flight 463 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 463 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 463 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MilborneOne (talk) 14:00, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of West Air Sweden Flight 294 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article West Air Sweden Flight 294 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/West Air Sweden Flight 294 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 02:50, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2015 Roubaix shootings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 Roubaix shootings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 Roubaix shootings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Daallo Airlines Flight 3159

I see you created the Daallo Airlines Flight 3159 article. You've been around long enough now to know that article needs structure. The better an article is, the better the chance of avoiding the deletionists. Suggest

• lede
• aircraft
• event
• investigation
• references

would be appropriate. Mjroots (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Thane stabbing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Thane stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Thane stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of 2016 Thane stabbing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 Thane stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Thane stabbing (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greek Legend (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View image

Please make a new request in commons. Diretor Adobe (talk) 12:04, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Discussion

Talk:Coverage_of_Google_Street_View#Scottish_Street_View

This is a discussion that you need to see. Pablothepenguin (talk) 10:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Content dispute on Eurovision Song Contest 2016

It has been noted that you have engaged in an edit war recently over the choice of description for Romanian's withdrawal at the Eurovision Song Contest 2016. Please note there is an active discussion taking place at Talk:Eurovision Song Contest 2016#Romania, Disqualified/Withdrew that I advise you to take a look and and perhaps contribute towards the debate, in order to reach a broad and mutual consensus with your fellow Wikipedian editors. Regards, Wes Mouse ✒ 09:54, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

My Edits

Stop messing around with my edits. Leave them alone, you have been reported to administrators. Pablothepenguin (talk) 19:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Huh? I think you are kidding me. That edits are called vandalism. - EugεnS¡m¡on 19:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

How dare you! The are not vandalism, they are good faith, but one is to remove unsourced information and the other is to ask a legitimate question in the talk page. Pablothepenguin (talk) 19:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't have enough time for you, almost all your edits are trolling and vandalism and maybe you will be blocked forever. - EugεnS¡m¡on 19:55, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Talk:Coverage of Google Street View. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 23:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

For your information

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Click here[1] to see it....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bella (brand)

The article Bella (brand) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:09, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

WP:ITSFAMOUS is not a valid rationale for notability. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Semnatura.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Semnatura.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of O.b. (brand) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article O.b. (brand) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/O.b. (brand) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 19:20, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Edition needed on Coverage of Google Street View

Please add Puerto Rico as public street view and first caribbean country available and add Nigeria, Ivory Coast and New Caledonia as business views only, and add Nigeria as public streets in Future section. 187.106.145.195 (talk) 12:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2012 UEFA Europa League Final.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2012 UEFA Europa League Final.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2015 Women's World Handball logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2015 Women's World Handball logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2016 European Women's Handball Championship logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2016 European Women's Handball Championship logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alex Florea

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Alex Florea, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Alex Florea to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

- Happysailor ^(Talk) 21:48, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Ilinca & Alex Florea.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Ilinca & Alex Florea.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Balas.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Balas.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Toni tec.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Toni tec.JPG. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Jucatorul de Iubiri.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jucatorul de Iubiri.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Suflet Gol.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suflet Gol.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Google Earth

You added a tag that the article Google Earth needs to be updated. Why didn't you just update the article? There are too many people already who only add tags and leave the actual work to other people. --Maxl (talk) 20:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

No answer? --Maxl (talk) 12:05, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Românii au talent (season 6) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Românii au talent (season 6) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Românii au talent (season 6) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiwilms (talk • contribs) 14:39, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100 giro.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100 giro.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Românii au talent (season 5)

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Românii au talent".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of 2014 SOCATA TBM crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 SOCATA TBM crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 SOCATA TBM crash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:MonSapin.JPG

The file File:MonSapin.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Final la Kretzu.JPG

The file File:Final la Kretzu.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:27, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Io la Horezu.JPG

The file File:Io la Horezu.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Copy of ABCD0001.JPG

The file File:Copy of ABCD0001.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Haystacks outside Horezu, Vâlcea County, Romania.jpg

The file File:Haystacks outside Horezu, Vâlcea County, Romania.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned personal image, no foreseeable use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about 2017 Puebla earthquake

Hello, Eugen Simion 14,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 2017 Puebla earthquake should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Puebla earthquake .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

J947^{(c) (m)} 18:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Street View Around the World

Billywr Maps is a version of Google Maps that allows Street View around the world. Since 2016, Billywr covers Street View over 200 countries of the world. 177.183.0.18 (talk) 01:08, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Century Gothic">[[User:Eugen Simion 14|<span style="color:black">'''Eugεn'''</span>]][[User talk:Eugen Simion 14|<span style="color:gold">'''S¡m¡on'''</span>]]</font> : EugεnS¡m¡on

to

<span style="font-family: Century Gothic;">[[User:Eugen Simion 14|<b style="color:black">Eugεn</b>]][[User talk:Eugen Simion 14|<b style="color:gold">S¡m¡on</b>]]</span> : EugεnS¡m¡on

—Anomalocaris (talk) 16:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Românii au talent (season 6)

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Românii au talent".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 08:09, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Street View releases 232, 233 and 234

• Release 232 took place on April 9 and added off-road views in Gold Coast, Australia
• Release 233 took place on April 18 and added Christmas and Cocos islands (Currently inaccessible direct from Google Maps, and only accessible through the gallery)
• Release 234 took place today (April 19) and added 7 more canadian parks

Please put the releases 232, 233 and 234 into the timeline. CreatorWiki (talk) 21:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Coverage of Google Street View

I replaced the "Date of newest additions" column with "Date of most recent imagery", I still cleaned all column data for editors to see the dates of the latest images and re-fill the column with dates. CreatorWiki (talk) 19:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Eugen Simion 14. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Parc Drumul Taberei metro station

Unsourced. Xx236 (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Parc Drumul Taberei metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Parc Drumul Taberei metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 10:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Râul Doamnei metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Râul Doamnei metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 10:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Academia Militară metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Academia Militară metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Constantin Brâncuși metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Constantin Brâncuși metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:49, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Orizont metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Orizont metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Favorit metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Favorit metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Tudor Vladimirescu metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tudor Vladimirescu metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Romancierilor metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romancierilor metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Valea Ialomiței metro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Valea Ialomiței metro station, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 11:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events

Hello. I wanted to invite you to the WikiProject of Current Events as you have done excellent work in the Portal:Current events and articles that the WikiProject is involved in. Most editors are not aware that the WikiProject became active again back in April 2020 (Had been inactive/hibernation for years). I just wanted to invite you and hope you will consider joining. (WikiProject of Current Events lead coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 17:12, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Onești attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Onești attack, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onești attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Screenshot of the building.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of the building.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

2021 Onesti stabbing

In regard to this edit, how did they manage to have a trial and convictions already for a murder that took place just last week? And what was the perpetrator's wife convicted of? She isn't even mentioned in the main body of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Google Street View Coverage 2021

Hi, Google Street View updates are happening now, please read the articles they are not from the future they are from those dates.--Seb { 💬 Talk + 📝 Edits } 21:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2009 Landshut shooting

The article 2009 Landshut shooting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TartarTorte 14:25, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

coords giza mosque fire

Hi Eugen Simion 14, could you tell me why you say the coordinates are wrong? nableezy - 17:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Look at the satellite images, in connection with the videos of the aftermath. It's an old neighbourhood where the fire took place.- EugεnS¡m¡on 18:42, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Your signature and linter errors

Just a reminder that your signature contains obsolete font tags. They create Linter errors, and it is advised that you change your signature to <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;">[[User:Eugen Simion 14|<span style="color:black">'''Eugεn'''</span>]][[User talk:Eugen Simion 14|<span style="color:gold">'''S¡m¡on'''</span>]]</span> ASAP.

The purpose of this message is because Linter errors affect the way the page looks, and with a lot of errors, the page may render badly. To reduce Linter errors, please change your signature.

If the software doesn't accept my replacement signature, let me know, and if that's the case, unfortunately you may have to change it to something else. Sheep (talk) 04:38, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 Brăila attack for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Brăila attack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Brăila attack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Super Ψ Dro 08:10, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Change of Date for Apple Look Around

Hi there,

I wanted to clarify my edits in Apple Look Around, specifically with the date change of the new expansion. I understand that the source I used said April 7, but in reality, Apple began to launch the expansion on April 6 (I can attest to this, as I checked the maps at 11 or 12 AM EST and saw that the maps were updating). Moreover, Apple's press release for the new map data showed April 7, but like the expansion before this one, it came after midnight EST (ie: the maps were launched several hours before the press release was published). If it should be April 7, then that's fine. But I wanted to let you know that it started to update on April 6.

I hope this clears things up! Losipov (talk) 19:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mian Channu school house bombing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mian Channu school house bombing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mian Channu school house bombing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 07:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2010 Papua New Guinea bus crash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Thebiguglyalien (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2024 (UTC)