SamaranEmerald

Welcome!

Hello, SamaranEmerald, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Killiondude (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm a little surprised that you decided to register as an editor just to oppose an ITN candidate? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Good guess, but incorrect. You see I have been planning on joining the wiki several times in the past, initially to edit pages dealing with plants, and I happened to come across this page by chance after hitting the random page button several dozen times (I was bored, so I just wanted to see what articles I would come across just by hitting the button). In truth, I was originally going to support the nomination, but after reading such overestimated, preposterous rantings by users such as those made by yourself, I thought to myself "this nomination is starting to get out of hand" and that's when I changed my mind and decided to oppose the nomination. SamaranEmerald (talk) 01:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Hwasong-15

What about JTBC and RT and Reuters? KCNA is reliable when identifying claims from DPRK --조승희2007416 (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Hey dude, I recently came to know that you reverted all my edits. So, may I come to know the reason why you did that? N. Nimesh (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Edit-Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Hwasong-15. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Hornetzilla78 (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

January 2018

I believe that I did add reliable sources in my edit to 2017-18 North Korea crisis FrankM113 (talk) 00:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Rationale for revert

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to 2018 North Korea–United States summit does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!

An explanation of your reasoning for this second revert of an illustration of Hwasong-15 would be helpful, thank you. KinkyLipids (talk) 20:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 North Korea–United States summit. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. The image you reverted, while controversial, is protected by the Creative Commons License, and is thus Fair Use. In addition, please remember to add edit summaries to any edits you make, as failure to do so may be interpreted as WP:VANDALISM Hornetzilla78 (talk) 20:31, 20 June 2018 (UTC)