Archive 1Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Notability / reliability of sources

Hi Lor. Just wanted some clarifications in order to improve the article about the CMCRC, given that it looks like the content of the article is supported by reliable sources and given how the work of this institution has permeated its field and beyond. Any pointers will be helpful. Thanks Rdozzz (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Huggle message

Hey Lor! You are receiving this message because you are subscribed at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Huggle/Members#Beta_testers

I have recently launched a new downloads for beta testers that contains nightly builds of huggle, eg. versions that are built every day from our master branch and contains latest huggle. These builds are currently provided only for Windows and Ubuntu. You can find them here: http://huggle.wmflabs.org/builds/

Please keep in mind that these don't have any automatic updates and if you download and start using nightly build, you will need to update it yourself! So don't get yourself to running old version, it's possible to install both stable and nightly huggle, which is what I suggest.

Keep the bug reports coming to phabricator: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/maniphest/task/create/?projects=Huggle Many thanks! Petrb (talk) 10:08, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Enid Blyton

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Enid Blyton. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

about deleting my image file

Dear Lor

Iam the user "cydyoo" and I would like to Contest this speedy deletion of the image "Seoulwelfarefoundation.jpg" because it is my creation. I simply forgot to check the box that the file is owned by me.. so Please don't delete the file and I already uploaded the file.

sincerely

cydyoo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cydyoo (talkcontribs) 00:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Reminder - Further process

@Lor: Hi, as per your confirmation resubmitted the article [: Draft Hradyesh] on 17 Dec , request your kind attention for further necessary process. - Thanks One life to live (talk) 10:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

VisualEditor News 2015—#1

 

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has fixed many bugs and worked on VisualEditor's appearance, the coming Citoid reference service, and support for languages with complex input requirements. Status reports are posted on Mediawiki.org. Upcoming plans are posted at the VisualEditor roadmap.

The Wikimedia Foundation has named its top priorities for this quarter (January to March). The first priority is making VisualEditor ready for deployment by default to all new users and logged-out users at the remaining large Wikipedias. You can help identify these requirements. There will be weekly triage meetings which will be open to volunteers beginning Wednesday, 11 February 2015 at 12:00 (noon) PST (20:00 UTC). Tell Vice President of Engineering Damon Sicore, Product Manager James Forrester and other team members which bugs and features are most important to you. The decisions made at these meetings will determine what work is necessary for this quarter's goal of making VisualEditor ready for deployment to new users. The presence of volunteers who enjoy contributing MediaWiki code is particularly appreciated. Information about how to join the meeting will be posted at mw:Talk:VisualEditor/Portal shortly before the meeting begins. 

Due to some breaking changes in MobileFrontend and VisualEditor, VisualEditor was not working correctly on the mobile site for a couple of days in early January. The teams apologize for the problem.

Recent improvements

The new design for VisualEditor aligns with MediaWiki's Front-End Standards as led by the Design team. Several new versions of the OOjs UI library have also been released, and these also affect the appearance of VisualEditor and other MediaWiki software extensions. Most changes were minor, like changing the text size and the amount of white space in some windows. Buttons are consistently color-coded to indicate whether the action:

  • starts a new task, like opening the ⧼visualeditor-toolbar-savedialog⧽ dialog:  blue ,
  • takes a constructive action, like inserting a citation:  green ,
  • might remove or lose your work, like removing a link:  red , or
  • is neutral, like opening a link in a new browser window:  gray.

The TemplateData editor has been completely re-written to use a different design (T67815) based on the same OOjs UI system as VisualEditor (T73746). This change fixed a couple of existing bugs (T73077 and T73078) and improved usability.

Search and replace in long documents is now faster. It does not highlight every occurrence if there are more than 100 on-screen at once (T78234).

Editors at the Hebrew and Russian Wikipedias requested the ability to use VisualEditor in the "Article Incubator" or drafts namespace (T86688, T87027). If your community would like VisualEditor enabled on another namespace on your wiki, then you can file a request in Phabricator. Please include a link to a community discussion about the requested change.

Looking ahead

The Editing team will soon add auto-fill features for citations. The Citoid service takes a URL or DOI for a reliable source, and returns a pre-filled, pre-formatted bibliographic citation. After creating it, you will be able to change or add information to the citation, in the same way that you edit any other pre-existing citation in VisualEditor. Support for ISBNs, PMIDs, and other identifiers is planned. Later, editors will be able to contribute to the Citoid service's definitions for each website, to improve precision and reduce the need for manual corrections.

We will need editors to help test the new design of the special character inserter, especially if you speak Welsh, Breton, or another language that uses diacritics or special characters extensively. The new version should be available for testing next week. Please contact User:Whatamidoing (WMF) if you would like to be notified when the new version is available. After the special character tool is completed, VisualEditor will be deployed to all users at Phase 5 Wikipedias. This will affect about 50 mid-size and smaller Wikipedias, including Afrikaans, Azerbaijani, Breton, Kyrgyz, Macedonian, Mongolian, Tatar, and Welsh. The date for this change has not been determined.

Let's work together

Subscribe or unsubscribe at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Newsletter. Translations are available through Meta. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 20:23, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bloody Saturday (photograph)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloody Saturday (photograph). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollback 2015

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollback 2015. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

05:57:28, 30 January 2015 review of submission by Rdozzz


Hi Lor. I'm at a loss as to why the sources and references, as well as the content of the article, do not establish the CMCRC as notable given how its work has permeated its field. Any pointers will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Rdozzz (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC) Rdozzz (talk) 05:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

"What did you object to in my revision concerning The Ogre?"

What did you object to in my revision concerning The Ogre?

"I need encouragement"

Hello Thanks for your edit. But you are too soon. Let me finish this. it is my first. I need encouragement. This is no encouragement. please do not edit until i am ready. and no, i do not want to try in some private area, too difficult. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heisenbergsfear (talkcontribs) 04:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

@Heisenbergsfear: you cannot add Copyright violations to Wikipedia, as in, you cannot just rip the text of the urban dictionary into Wikipedia. LorTalk 04:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors February 2015 Newsletter
 

 

Drive: Thanks to everyone who participated in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. Of the 38 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: We were able to remove August 2013 from the general copyediting backlog and November 2014 from the request-page backlog. Many thanks, everyone!

Blitz: The February Blitz will run from February 15–21 and again focuses on the requests page. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one request article. Sign up here!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ottendorfer Public Library and Stuyvesant Polyclinic Hospital

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ottendorfer Public Library and Stuyvesant Polyclinic Hospital. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

17:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

19:10:59, 9 February 2015 review of submission by ARTicle123


I have edited this article several times, and feel at this point, it is a historical/content only read from a neutral point of view. I have thoroughly read some other articles about similar companies on Wikipedia that were published, which are very much the same as this one. Can you please re-review, or please suggest ways in which I can edit in a way that will be sure to get approved for publishing?

Thank you very much for your time.

Respectfully, Julie

ARTicle123 (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

@ARTicle123: I have submitted the draft for review by another reviewer, i generally try not to review an AFC draft more than once. LorTalk 08:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
(Also, as a quick note, you don't have to put your name at the end of a message, and i would not recommend it anyway. As generally privacy is quite an important factor to have in mind when editing. See WP:ANONYMOUS LorTalk 08:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC))

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ban appeals reform 2015

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ban appeals reform 2015. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

GOCE March newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2015 Newsletter
 

 

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 21 people who signed up, eight copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: The blitz removed 16 articles from the requests list, and we're almost done with December 2014. Many thanks, everyone!

Drive: The month-long March drive begins in about a week. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Biblioworm and Philg88.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

16:29, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015


Animal roleplay page - false vandalism charge

The only change I made at the "Animal roleplay" page was the date 1948 to 1946. Someone else left that dumb comment which was flagged as vandalism. Somehow this shows up in the history as my change but that is not true. Either there is a glitch or people know how to hack into the system and leave spam or vandalism and make it look like it was done by the previous person who made changes. I would look into that possibility -- especially if you receive similar complaints in the future. -- Ghost2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghost2011 (talkcontribs) 16:47, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Ghost2011: I would highly doubt it, mostly due to how much work is put in by the Developers of Mediawiki (The software that runs Wikipedia, and many other wikimedia, and non-wikimedia sites). If you really think you've found a security issue though you should read mw:Reporting security bugs. Though i highly doubt that it would do unnoticed if the history was manually changed. LorTalk 00:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
@Ghost2011: Hmm, just looked at the history and it seems you didn't do it after all, sorry about that. LorTalk 00:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-10

16:41, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Spanish Civil War, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Isthisuseful (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

  Hi Lor. Belated thanks for your help at the Teahouse. Much appreciated. Cheers. tH0r (talk contribs) 13:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

Questions

As one involved in SPIs, can you answer the following questions please.

1. If a checkuser spontaneously blocks a named account as a sock, with no SPI and no other discussion at all, should the blocked account be tagged as "confirmed" or as "suspected"?

2. Should a normal administrator (non-checkuser) blocking a named account ever tag it as "confirmed" when there has been no SPI and no checkuser involvement? 94.196.210.161 (talk) 22:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

  1. It depends, if the block summary is something along the lines of {{checkuserblock-account}}, then it should be tagged as "Confirmed" as a check with the Checkuser tool has been preformed. Though if it's anything else, then it's "Suspected". If in doubt, contact the blocking Admin/Checkuser.
  2. No, confirmed is only when the checkuser tools have been used, so it should generally be "suspected". Though if they make a block with no SPI there's chance that they may be scrutinised for their actions.
Hope that helps, though i would not recommend posting to every clerk's talk page, as it does get annoying for most of the clerks. LorTalk 07:10, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Harassment

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Harassment. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

15:19, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Your message to me and your revert of my edit

Hi, Lor

Wiki Notifications informs me that you left me a message on my Talk Page, but for reasons I don't understand your message does not appear there. Was there something that you needed to say to me? Also, Wiki Notifications informs me that you reverted my recent edit of an image caption on the Forestall-class aircraft carrier page. From your Talk Page I take it that you take Wiki Vandalism very seriously and that you are used to a certain amount of 'push-back'. In my case I do a lot of copy editing and other minor edits. I consider myself to be a general reader and not an expert, therefor when I read something I don't understand I fix it so that I can understand it. In this particular case if I hadn't just visited the Kitty Hawk-class page I wouldn't have understood that I was being invited to compare the difference between two different classes of aircraft carriers in the photo caption, so I fixed the caption so future non-expert readers would understand that. Perhaps you had a reason for reverting to the previous version and can explain it to me. I also happen to be a member of the Wiki Project: Ships, I've never had complaints from them with my work before, and if you check my contributions page you will see that I have made many similar edits. It's really not a big deal to me, but perhaps if you think you might have reverted me in error, you can reinstate my previous edit. Best Regards Atani (talk) 04:25, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

@Atani: Actually, funny enough, it was a Mistake i made in Huggle. I was trying to press Command + Q to Close it, and as Q is the hotkey to revert an edit i accidentally reverted and warned a few people of vandalism, though this has now been reverted. LorTalk 04:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. RegardsAtani (talk) 05:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 00:08, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

15:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Reference desk. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 22 March 2015 (UTC)