Happyjit Singh

October 2023

Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

IN THE PREVIOUS DATA ALSO NO SOURCE WAS INCLUDED Happyjit Singh (talk) 15:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Do not change WP:STABLE longstanding content without WP:CONSENSUS in the talk page. And do not edit war. See WP:BRD. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:17, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Okay, I'll take care from next time. But you must take care to improve accuracy in Wikipedia. Happyjit Singh (talk) 15:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2004 Indian general election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ok123l (talk) 11:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Ok123l. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2014 Indian general election have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Ok123l (talk) 11:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 Tripura Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at 2018 Tripura Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 11:19, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

It's not a major party Happyjit Singh (talk) 11:53, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

It has won few seats using BJP's symbol Happyjit Singh (talk) 11:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Mr Sengupta told not to add minor parties Happyjit Singh (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Don't make edits to earlier elections. Parties have been added per WP:RS at the time of election. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023 (2)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Next Indian general election in Bihar and various other articles, you may be blocked from editing. ShaanSengupta^Talk 17:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Are you sure you want to engage in an edit war? Do you understand dispute resolution and the meaning of these notices? Do I need to take this to admins or you want to talk here? You added Ajit Sharma as JDU leader. Is the image of Ajit or Nitish? Do you know how these Infoboxes work? Have you read MOS:INDELECT? Before making a new change I would suggest you to read it. One more revert and this is going to Admins. ShaanSengupta^Talk 17:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Just to let you know one more revert by you will lead to violation of WP:3RR which is an abuse and may lead to loss of editing privileges. Plus you are continuously engaging in original research with your edits which is not allowed. ShaanSengupta^Talk 18:07, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

---

@Happyjit Singh This is regarding the revert you made at Next Indian general election in West Bengal. MOS:INDELECT#Infobox says that Only those parties that are covered by Reliable Media as a major contender for winning that election are listed in the infobox. And party-wise Opinion polls results show that INC + CPI i.e. the Sanjukta Morcha is winning maximum 2 seats. Hence it is not termed as major contender by reliable sources. Therefore it can't be added. Plus looking at your contributions it shows that you are deeply interested in reverting other editors work. While you may not be wrong everytime but you need to tone down the aggression while doing so. Repeated abuses of the privilege may land you in unwanted trouble. ShaanSengupta^Talk 01:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your believe in opinion polls aren't logical. In opinion polls, it shows INDIA will win 0 seats in Gujarat 1 seat in Jharkhand etc. That doesn't mean we'll add only one party. West Bengal politics like Bangladesh any major party can win 0 seat and less than 20% vote share. You can remove it after announcement of results if they perform badly. I think we should discuss with others about it User:XYZ 250706 and User:Soman. Happyjit Singh. I can't discuss with a person who has declared himself as a BJP member in her user page. I have to listen to others. As you mayn't be neutral. (talk) 02:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Moreover, CPIM and INC aren't TMC ally in Bengal that we can add vote share and seats together. Happyjit Singh (talk) 02:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Some states has 1 or 2 seat. so, getting 1 or 2 seats can't be considered as a treat. Even my home state has 2 seats. Happyjit Singh (talk) 02:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Looks like you haven't read the rules. You might believe that Opinion polls are illogical. MOS:INDELECT doesn't. Had it, it wouldn't have been (t)here. MOS:INDELECT#Infobox says The major contenders should not be removed from infobox after the results are declared even if they get 0 seats, because they "were" the major contenders "during" the election. So as you said it can be removed after results is wrong. As for CPI or CPIM I mentioned Sanjukta Morcha so this doesn't make sense. And no rule says that every party needs to be added. Infoboxes have always been made according to results of last election and the status defined by reliable sources (which is done through Opinion and Exit Polls). I won't revert you untill this discussion is finished because that will lead to a violation of WP:3RR which I don't want. As for me being neutral, there is no need to give a proof to you, but just to let you know I am the one who removed BJP from Next Indian general election in Kerala since it is not a major party there which again violating the rule was added by you. Also XYZ 250706 and Soman, I would want you guys to move it to the article's talk page if you think is right since this is a topic related disputed and now more than 2 editors are involved. Others interested might also want to be involved. ShaanSengupta^Talk 04:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

See the last election pages. BJP had been added even with 1 seat and INC and CPIM had also been added. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh I believe you are talking about 2019 Indian general election in West Bengal. As for BJP it was added because the Opinion polls predicted it to be a major contender. Please see the 2019 Indian general election in West Bengal#Surveys and Polls. And for INC & CPIM, INC was added because it was the second largest party and CPIM because it has greater vote share. But for this election BJP is second largest party with second best vote share and surveys predicting it to be a major player. This is not the case with either INC or CPIM. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:17, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

I TALKED ABOUT 2014 ALSO. Opinion pols may not be correct as in 2004 Indian general election. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Although I wasn't here in 2004 or in 2009 or in 2014 or even in 2019. I am just assuming what others would have done. There is no mention of surveys in 2004 and 2009. But INC, CPIM, TMC all were major contenders till 2019. As for BJP being added in 2014, I can't understand what was the scenario in which it was added. But just because something (maybe wrong) has been done earlier doesn't make it correct to do now. And my suggestion to prevent it from going further would be for you to self-revert or prove (written in rules) that non-major parties can be added too. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

See the opinion polls of 2004 Indian general election. They shows NDA's victory but UPA formed government. TMC was added in 2004 even though it won 1 seat. What if I add CPIM and INC vote share and seats together Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh No that column is for party and not alliance. I just saw you have done this in Bihar election article also. This is vandalism. Please remove that yourself. Otherwise I will have to report that vandalism. That section is to mention party statistics not alliance. TMC is added because it had greater vote share than 2nd largest Congress. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

But this has also been done in Tamil Nadu election pages also. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

This hadn't done by me. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh What is this? You yourself say that you have added combined alliance vote share. Revision as of 19:15, 13 November 2023 ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:12, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Even in Kerala Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Please check 2019 Indian general election in Tamil Nadu Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Next Indian general election in Kerala, 2021 Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly election Happyjit Singh. Infact it has been repeted in all election pages related to Tamil Nadu and Kerala (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your account says you're not older here. You've joined on May 2023. Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh That's what I said. I was not there when those pages were made so I am not going to look after every previous page. I have other things to do other than being here. I do this because I like it. Didn't mean I will give whole day for this. I will end myself with repeating myself. Two wrongs don't make one right. If any wrong thing is mentioned that doesn't mean we too can do the same with liberty. If you have time and are willing to, then please fix them. Had everything mentioned on Wikipedia be right then there had been no use of editors. I see you have slightly fixed the article. I would suggest we close this if you have no problem. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh. Do you know you have just violated WP:3RR at Bengal election page? Should I report or you gonna stop yourself. Can you see that the TMC logo is looking very small after your change. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:49, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

I use Laptop for editing. In Laptop it looks diff from mobile phone Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Thatswhy it is made uniformed so that everyone can see it in same way. But what about your violation of 3RR? Are you stopping here or shall I make a report. I advised you not to be aggressive with your editing but you have refused to listen to my advice. Now, If you want to stop then you can self revert which will make it uniformed for everyone. Or else let me know, so that I take it to admins. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:55, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Now it's uniform Happyjit Singh (talk) 07:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Why are you removing spacing in the infobox even after being asked not to. If you see Template:Infobox election which is used in those articles all the = signs are in a single line. Please take note to not repeat this. = in a single line helps people who do source editing. ShaanSengupta^Talk 13:09, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh I have never been to Telangana Legislative Assembly page. I can't be everywhere correcting everything. I told you before too, I have other things to do. I have not been given any Theka by Wikipedia to correct every wrong. I do so because I want to. Anyways, There are others too. And better you distance yourself from these comments and refrain from taking these unwanted digs at others. Digging a hole! ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh How to make you understand to not remove the spacing from the Infoboxes of articles while editing? How many more times do I need to ask you. Can you please do source editing. Its been a month since you are here. Please start source editing, it will help you understand better. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:01, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Okay Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh you are still doing the same thing. You said that you won't do it. But you are not following your own words. Please try to understand this small thing. ShaanSengupta^Talk 09:26, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

---

• I remember you were very well explained not to add INC to Next Indian general election in Odisha page last time because it is not being covered as major contender in the state by reliable sources. But you are doing the same again. Can you please follow the rules and instructions of MOS:INDELECT. ShaanSengupta^Talk 09:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Empty tables

Stop adding empty tables to election articles. Results tables are added only after elections are scheduled and parties announce candidates. Dhruv edits (talk) 10:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh You have been already warned before for adding empty table in election articles and yet you are doing it again at Next West Bengal Legislative Assembly election. Stop your disruptive editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 10:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

OKAY REMOVING Happyjit Singh (talk) 10:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your userpage

@Happyjit Singh, you have literally copied my userpage. But copying requires mind. Please correct the link of your account statistics. It is showing my stats. Also some more things needs correction. You have joined in October and not May. Your signature is not what you have mentioned there. Please find the rest and fix them. ShaanSengupta^Talk 04:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Please don't mind for copying. I've corrected. (Happyjit Singh) 06:20, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at 2023 Tripura Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:55, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Indian general election in Tamil Nadu, you may be blocked from editing. You have been given multiple warnings for disruptive editing on Indian election pages Dhruv edits (talk) 15:50, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

DON'T USE THIS WORD DISRUPTIVE. SPECIFY THE DISRUPTIVE EDIT. Happyjit Singh (talk) 18:44, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh You have been told numerous times now by different users not to make edits that are against MOS:INDELECT guidelines. Dhruv edits (talk) 18:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Indian Infobox election

Template:Indian Infobox election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:20, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Okay delete fast. I created it mistakenly. Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:48, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

My Template

Hello, I'm Shaan Sengupta. An edit that you recently made to Template:User Akhand Bharat has been reverted. If you want to have a template with your statement, please make one for yourself. You can make something like Template:User Secular Akhand Bharat or anything like this. Please donot make any change to my template. The template is used by others too and it is not necessary that they subscribe to your changes. I made it and I use it, I don't subscribe to that change so you can't do it. ShaanSengupta^Talk 02:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Can you please understand

@Happyjit Singh Can you please start following MOS:INDELECT and use its guideline as a layout for Indian election articles. You have been told innumerable times but you don't seem to understand. You now are an extended confirmed user which means you have access to most of the articles. Please fall in line and follow rules. ShaanSengupta^Talk 17:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh Since you have accepted that MOS:INDELECT is for legislative and general election, so this article is also about general election so we have to follow it. Also when someone reverts and leaves a message at talk page you are supposed to discuss first before making further changes since your edits are disputed. Remember every edit is deemed to have WP:Consensus until it is disputed. And this is disputed so please discuss first before restoring your edits. As far as rules about major and non-major are concerned MOS:INDELECT states that The major contenders should not be removed from infobox after the results are declared even if they get 0 seats, because they "were" the major contenders "during" the election which you again violated. Bcoz this clearly shows that even major parties can have 0 seats that doesn't make them non-major. I would once again advise you to discuss before restoring. Repeated policy violation of WP:Consensus will force me to report your actions. ShaanSengupta^Talk 02:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

In general elections even some parties which swipe in the state with more than 40% 50% vote share get less than 20% and get 0 seats and the parties which get less than 2% votes and 0 seat swipe with more than 20% votes and become runner up as incase of Delhi, Tripura etc. So, there are no major contenders in general election at state level. I mean by general election 2024 Indian general election. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:47, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

So, add the parties with at least 1 seat. You can remove if they get 0 seat in next election. Happyjit Singh (talk) 05:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Wait before you start again. ShaanSengupta^Talk 05:58, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

I told you not to revert before this discussion. But you don't seem to understand. Now I am reporting your actions. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

YOU'RE LATE Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Happyjit Singh not following standard layout and also not keen to discuss. regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:22, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh: Warning You will be indefinitely blocked if you continue editing before responding at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Happyjit Singh not following standard layout and also not keen to discuss. For example, why are you edit warring at 2024 Indian general election in Uttar Pradesh? Can you show a discussion or guideline that supports your edits? Please do not answer here. Respond at the link given in this comment. Johnuniq (talk) 06:56, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnuniq (talk • contribs)

Moving pages

Hello, I've noticed you've been creating a bunch of pages and then moving them from title to title, often blanking the redirects behind you. Can you explain what is going on? Do you need help with anything? So many serial moves can be considered disruptive editing. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 16:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

I came here to ask about your page moves as well. Moving an article should not be done carelessly.

But I also happened to look at your User page as well where you claim to be a Doctor. Can I ask what your doctoral degree is? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:35, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I reverted you

Hi @Happyjit Singh I have reverted your edits at two pages. 2023 Nagaland Legislative Assembly election and 2023 Meghalaya Legislative Assembly election and the simple reason is bcoz you can read the information page of Indian Election article structure which says that parties considered major contenders at the time of election are not to be removed even if they get 0 seats. I have told this to you before too. But you seem to forget. Please remember next time and if you have some questions regarding this please ask before you just blindly revert me and restore your edit. Bcoz you are an extended confirmed user now and you need to be little less agressive with your actions. Also can you please explain why you passed an uncivil comment in your edit summary at the Nagaland page. Please read WP:CIVIL and behave properly. There have been previous instances too ahere you have done the same. Please try not to repeat otherwise reporting this will be the only choice. Thank you. ShaanSengupta^Talk 16:15, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

I HAD REMOVED IT FOR MY BENIFIT BECUASE I HAD ADDED POPULAR VOTE SHARE LEADER'S SEAT AND SINCE AND THEY HAD LESS THAN 10% VOTE SHARE. Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:04, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

AND 2 AND 4 SEATS Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:05, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Can you explain clearly. Not getting your point. And why are you using Capital fonts. ShaanSengupta^Talk 06:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I had removed them because they had 2 or 4 seats and less than 10% votes Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:22, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Even many opinion polls have put them under others Happyjit Singh (talk) 06:23, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh You removed every party except BJP & NDPP. What I can see is you removed major contenders like NCP who won 7 and NPP who won 5 and LJP (RV) had better vote share than NPP, therefore they were added. NPF was single largest party with best vote percentage in last election. Although it performed poorly in this election but as per MOS major contender is not removed even if it gets 0 seats. So what made you remove these parties. ShaanSengupta^Talk 07:13, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

I'M about Meghalaya. I had removed them because they had less than 10% votes and they were new. Happyjit Singh (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

It's an undemocratic one party state like China. So, it would be not harm to add one party also. Happyjit Singh (talk) 07:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

@Happyjit Singh I warned you just yesterday to not pass uncivil comments and judgements. This is the last warning you are getting for it. The next time you do, I will make sure you are dealt accordingly. You are noone to make judgements and accuse states of being undemocratic. Its their choice for parties. They maybe like the work of that party and I am not getting into debate of its performance. ShaanSengupta^Talk 08:30, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Marxist Economist per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 19:16, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Anyone mustn't be judged by his/her username. What's the proof I'm the sockpuppet of another account. Happyjit Singh (talk) 12:20, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Happyjit Singh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm an extended confirmed user of Wikipedia with 900 edits approx. My account is Happyjit Singh https://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Happyjit_Singh. Yesterday, someone alleged that I'm a sockpuppet of Marxist Economics. The username was blocked before creating my account. A user Shaan Sengupta filed an SPI. He alleged that he found he found many similarities with that account in the user account. He asked how I could know Bengali as I live in Delhi and Marxist's native language is Bengali. I knew basic Bengal as I studied at Burdwan Medical College MBBS. Marxist alleged he has a PhD in Physics from Jadavpur University. He also alleged I write in capital letters sometimes as another sockpuppet of Marxist. I write in capital letters for one day to highlight a letter. He also alleged that I mostly on Indian politics pages as Marxist Economics. I had little contribution to science-related pages. He also alleged I am not a communist but I'm not I'm liberal. Yes in my college days I was associated with SFI as in Bengal communism has a good presence. Marxist born in 2004 but I was born in 2000. Marxist has a B+ blood group but I have an O+ blood group. If I'm comparable to that account why not Shaan Sengupta he has many similarities though both of them edit mainly political articles at the same time have the same blood group and were born in the same year. I have carefully observed their respective user pages. So, please apple me. So, that I can contribute in Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

Your claims as to the differences in user pages is not remotely convincing; we have no way of independently verifying what you wrote or what another user wrote about your blood type, etc., is accurate. Nor do you address the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marxist Economist. In any case,  Confirmed sockpuppetry across multiple IP address ranges. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.