User talk:GainLine/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:GainLine. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Corrib Gas RfM
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Corrib Gas, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Fin©™ 10:19, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Request for mediation accepted
|
A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Corrib Gas.
|
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.
- Hello! Generally it's meant to be two-four weeks after the acceptance of the request (I think). If nothing happens by Sunday (two weeks after acceptance) I'll poke some people to try get a response! I myself am avoiding editing Corrib Gas articles totally (even for vandalism and such), so I can't really be any help. You could try bringing it up at WP:COIN if needs be. Thanks! 134.226.32.57 (talk) 18:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- That was weird, I got signed out between clicking edit on your page and submitting! Thanks! Fin©™ 18:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I found the best thing to do myself was just to walk away for a bit, wasn't getting anywhere, everything just descended into an edit war. Hopefully the mediation'll improve things! Thanks! Fin©™ 21:20, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
- That was weird, I got signed out between clicking edit on your page and submitting! Thanks! Fin©™ 18:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. I was not aware that there's mediation going on. I'll take a look, but can't promise to participate due to time constraints . NoCal100 (talk) 23:50, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Yep yep, I'd intended posting my own thoughts at some point this week, then when I saw you'd posted yesterday I thought I'd better get on it! I'll try to do so after the match at some point! Thanks! Fin©™ 16:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Well! Just added my thoughts there, just wondering, did you mean to "NPOV imagery" in the last section you added? (I assume you meant POV imagery, but don't want to change it!). Thanks! Fin©™ 10:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Replied on my talk page
The section heading says it all. Sorry about the delay. :) Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 11:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nableezy (talk) 21:07, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
- 1 more Nableezy (talk) 21:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
MedCab/MedCom
Yep, sure, work away! I'm probably going to be busy for most of today (college work, and if my friend pulls through with a ticket - the match!) but feel to set up another MedCab case (I note Phil's given his approval and Steve's worked talked to some people about it). Sounds good, gimme a shout when you've the page set up. The "vandal" you reverted on Brian O' Driscoll wasn't really being a vandal either, he speaks the truth!! =p Oh, I gave LP a heads up about the COIN section, just to be polite. Thanks! Laters. Fin©™ 10:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- No hassle, sure if I get a bit of free time I'll see what I can do. Ah yeah, don't worry, hopefully mediation'll sort all this out. Enjoy the match, though I know you won't like the result!! ;) Thanks! Fin©™ 11:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ya ya, ye deserved that in fairness. Didn't manage to get a ticket, just watched it in the pub instead. Don't go losing the final now, eh?! Thanks! Fin©™ 19:23, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Well! I've finally set up a new MedCab case. Sorry for the delay and such! Thanks! Fin©™ 23:06, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- Just letting you know that i've asked for opening statements on the case talk page. Best, Steve Crossin Talk/Help us mediate! 21:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Please take not of the link I posted beneath your comment. Whenever something is merged, the edit history related to the merged information need to be retained so the people who wrote it are properly attributed. Deletion is incompatible with merging. (Administrators can perform history mergers, but that is not advisable when there's overlap because it would make it seem like there was an edit war over the content when there wasn't) - Mgm|(talk) 16:26, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
- People who suggest merge and delete, usually want to retain the text, but have some objection to the title. Why don't you consider a simple merge and redirect to be the best idea? - Mgm|(talk) 17:35, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Image tagging for File:Eoin Reddan.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eoin Reddan.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
HC 09
Was wondering how long it'd take you ;) I was having flashbacks to the Wales game in the last thirty seconds though, screaming "no penalty, no penalty!!". Good game though, Elsom's some man! Fin©™ 22:26, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I know the feeling - would've been hilarious if Leicester scored and it went to penalties though. The first half of this (Canada game) was shite, it's improving a bit now though, Ireland finally figuring there's space out wide. Fin©™ 22:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- I still wanted Leinster to win, just would've been funny if it went to penalties! The whole passage of play in the first half from Ireland - block the drop goal->Stringer knock on->Duffy (I think?) fucking up the clearance->Dowling not knowing what to do once he got the ball - was a bit crazy. Keatley made a good run there in the last few minutes, seemed like the only point where they actually wanted to win it though! Fin©™ 22:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
Vandal++
Thanks for spotting the vandalism and update the counter! =) Thanks! Fin©™ 19:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Just a note
Books and schools are not eligible for speedy deletion under A7. Please remember that when tagging. Otherwise, keep up the good work. – B.hotep •talk• 20:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
G10 - A7
Hi, I've just deleted a sourced attack on a non-notable person as A7 rather than the G10 you tagged it as. G10 is for unsourced attacks, thanks ϢereSpielChequers 11:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Escuela Delengua CSD
I've removed the CSD tag from Escuela Delengua. Schools are specifically excepted from WP:CSD#A7. Perhaps WP:PROD is more appropriate here.—C45207 | Talk 09:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've proded that now, I used A7 as I beleived it to be a company offering language products rather than a "proper" school. Cheers G
ainLine ♠ ♥ 09:47, 29 June 2009 (UTC)- Ah, I see. You do appear to be correct about its being a company offering language products. Though, I don't know quite where to draw the line between company and private school.—C45207 | Talk 09:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- no worries, we'll let the prod run its course G
ainLine ♠ ♥ 09:57, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Livio Alvaro Bisterzo
I've deleted you CSD tag from Livio Alvaro Bisterzo. A7 doesn't apply because the article does make numerous claims to significance/importance. A PROD tag or AfD would be more appropriate. Cheers, TheLeftorium 10:54, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Notability of J. Edward Addicks
I have removed the tag you placed on this article. Notability is asserted in the first line of the article, and is established by the multiple sources that had already been placed on the page, including citations from books, periodicals, and a court case documenting his failed bid for Congress. Elpiseos (talk) 19:59, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Irish Rugby bios
Sure thing. :) I noticed they were in fairly terrible condition, so I thought I could improve them. I'd be happy to help. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 11:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. Once I get a little bit of free time, I'll get stuck in. :) ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:07, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- You're welcome. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 14:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
File source problem with File:TommyBowe.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:TommyBowe.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Tommy Bowe
Hey, great work on the Bowe page but just to correct he was actually at University of Ulster, Jordanstown despite playing for the Queens Uni rugby team. It was a mistake from the Hogan Stand Article. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.203.171 (talk) 01:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Mediation
I will be closing the mediation for the time being. With one party not editting there is little gain in trying to continue. With regards the to possible afd, do be careful, you may end up being seen as using process to solve a dispute. Although there is nothing wrong with that in a sense, it can sour a dispute. If any issues crop up, please email me, and ill help out as much as I can. Seddσn talk|WikimediaUK 12:30, 22 July 2009 (UTC)