Farzaneh

hi

Hi Farzaneh, why don't you come and contribute in Farsi wikipedia? --Taranet (talk) 19:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

fawiki

he dear welcome to fawiki and thanks for your mumps article.--Mardetanha ^talk 17:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Capgras

Hi Farzaneh, it depends on what you're comparing it to. It is uncommon in comparison to delusions as a whole, uncommon in schizophrenia, bipolar etc and after brain injury, but relatively common (approximately 10%) in the context of patients with dementia who have delusions, who are a subset of patients with dementia. - Vaughan (talk) 18:43, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

RE: Adding "e" at the end of the names

Hi, the reason why I add an " e " at the end of some Iranian first names is because almost all of non-Iranian viewers of English Wikipedia are not familiar with pronunciation of Iranian names, as we don't have " َ ِ ُ " in English, readers and speakers of English write exactly what they say, unlike Farsi in which we say " َ ِ ُ " when we pronounce words but we don't actually write them. So, for example, if I write " Ahmad Shamlou " as the English translation of " احمد شاملو ", the viewer of Ahmad Shamlou article would read it as " احمدْ شاملِوُ " which is incorrect because the correct pronunciation in Farsi is " ْاحمدِ شاملو " and not " احمدْ شاملِوُ ".

And the reason I change "ou"s in Iranian last names to "oo"s is because (for example) we (I mean Iranians) do not pronounce روزبِهِ پورنادِر (Roozbehe Poornader) as روزبهْ پِوُرنادر (Roozbeh Pournader) in Farsi.

Another common mistake we Iranians often make when writing our last names in English is translation of letter " ع " and also " ئ ". In fact, they are pronounced the same in Farsi, but some Iranians get confused when translating them to English. For example, last names " فدائی‌ " and " ساعی " have the same ending sound but some translate them as " Fadaee " and " Saee " and some others translate them as " Fadaei " and " Saei ". In fact, " Fadaei " and " Saei " are actually the correct translation.

Another common mistake by us (I mean Iranians) is translating the " ی ِ " or " ey " part of some last names such as " قمیشی ". Some people write " Ghomeishi " and some others write " Ghomeyshi ". In fact, " Ghomeyshi " is the correct translation because if we write " Ghomeishi ", it would be pronounced the same as " Fadaei " and " Saei " (it would be pronounced " قمعشی ") and readers would think that these three last names all have the letter " ع " or " ئ ", but actually " Ghomeishi " doesn't have " ع " in Farsi.

Another common mistake is putting " h " at the end of some Iranian first names and last names. This is incorrect because we (I mean Iranians) do not pronounce " h "s at the end of some names. For example, your first name Farzaneh, do we pronounce " فرزانه " with " ه " at the end or " فرزانهْ "? The answer is that we pronounce " فرزانهْ " and not " فرزانه " with " ه " at the end. And your complete name should be written as " Farzaneye Sarafraz " not " Farzaneh Sarafraz ". This (not putting " ye " at the end of some first names ending in " ه " in Farsi) is another common mistake. The reason I bolded " some " in the previous sentence is that putting " ye " at the end of first names depends on the situation, what I mean by situation is the way of pronouncing a first name and last name together in Farsi. For example: we pronounce " روزبهِ پورنادر " as " Roozbehe Poornader " and not " روزبه‌ْیِ پورنادر " (Roozbeye Poornader).

JuventiniFan (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Usurpation

• I hereby confirm that I have usurpated this username on 27 July 2012 and my old username was User:FarzanehSarafraz.

A kitten for you!

به مناسبت نام کاربری جدیدتون این پیشی تقدیمتون می‌شود.

Reza Mohammadi (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Riff Cohen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Riff Cohen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marc Wiese

The article Marc Wiese has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JMHamo (talk) 15:59, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Lattice Degeneration edits

Your edits were slightly confusing. Removing sections, reverting them to remove them again en masse. It appears that you removed the sentence that it was unknown if research is ongoing regarding the condition and an empty reference list, individually, then reverted, then deleted them both at once. If so, I'm only curious as to the additional effort. It did help the article, as an empty reference list is a waste and one editor not knowing of research is ongoing is not a statement of fact as to if research is ongoing or not.Wzrd1 (talk) 21:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I am glad you agreed with the edits. The revert and redo was just a small mistake. --Farzaneh (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Ah, rather what I suspected. Done similar myself in the past. Though, my prizewinner was reverting a reversion of a vandal, noticed what was reverted, then reverted the article back to its last unvandalized state.Wzrd1 (talk) 13:31, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Alireza Firouzja

The article Alireza Firouzja has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Everymorning (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Farzaneh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Can you help verify translations of articles from Farsi

Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Farsi to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Farsi article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Farsi , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Farsi. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

• Varoonegi
• Amir Ali Hajizadeh
• Mohammad Noje
• Jameh Mosque of Fahraj
• Hafshejan sugar factory (Chaharmahal)

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Farsi article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 05:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Farzaneh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Farzaneh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Claudine de Culam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudine de Culam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudine de Culam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Beeblebrox (talk) 02:49, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)