DieHoren

DieHoren, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi DieHoren! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Bsoyka (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Maurice Molarsky moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maurice Molarsky. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your message. I have sources for the material I have posted thus far and for the remainder of the biographical note. I will add it later today.

Frank Beck 74.66.73.143 (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, again--I have two questions: as I add citations, using the double-quote icon, I see the footnote cues but not the footnotes themselves, after typing them in. Is there a way to see the footnotes as I work?

Also, is there a way to save my additions without publishing them. That way they can all be reviewed at once.

Thanks.

Frank Beck 74.66.73.143 (talk) 23:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

I have added new information to the Early Life section of the page and have provided sources, as you suggested.

Thanks.

Frank Beck 74.66.73.143 (talk) 20:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Maurice Molarsky has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maurice Molarsky. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Theroadislong--

Thanks for your comments on the Maurice Molarsky draft. I apologize for publishing the article before it was completed and before the sources were entered. Several people in The Teahouse told me I should do that as a way of saving my work as I did it, but that seems to have been a mistake.

Re notability, I believe that Molarsky qualifies under three of Wikipedia's four criteria for articles about creative professionals:

Item 1: Molarsky is regarded as an important figure in 20th-century American painting, as shown by the lengthy entry about him in Who Was Who in American Art (1985 and 2001), a standard resource about American artists. It is available in every major art library and university in the English-speaking world and is widely used by art historians and galleries.

Item 2: Molarsky's work was the primary subject of numerous articles that appeared in mainstream US newspapers, including the Philadelphia Inquirer and The New York Times, from 1904 to 1950 (the year of his death). Those sources are now included in the draft.

Item 3: Molarsky's work played a significant part in numerous important exhibitions, including those at the Newman Galleries (1931), the Philadelphia Art Alliance (1938), the State Museum of Harrisburg (1939), the Woodmere Art Museum (1944), a memorial exhibition at the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts (one of the leading US art schools at the time), and a second show at the Newman Galleries (1995). His paintings are in the permanent collections of several notable art museums, which are listed in the last paragraph of the article.

Please let me know if you additional questions.

Thanks.

Frank Beck DieHoren (talk) 19:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I would suggest Wiki-linking the museums to show that they are notable and re-submit for review, topic seems to pass WP:NARTIST now. Theroadislong (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I have added Wiki-links for the museums that have them (all but one), and I have resubmitted the draft for review.

Thank you.

Frank Beck DieHoren (talk) 03:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

You have added wiki links as references not simple wiki links and you have not submitted for review. Theroadislong (talk) 08:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry -- I misunderstood your instructions. Where should I add the simple wiki links for the museums? DieHoren (talk) 14:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I already did it earlier today check the history. Theroadislong (talk) 16:11, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Sorry to be so dense, but I don't see the wiki-links that you added. The museums listed in References are still linked to the webpages of the respective museums.

Please advise. DieHoren (talk) 16:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

The last paragraph of the draft "Examples of Maurice Molarsky's paintings are now held by the Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts the Athenaeum of Philadelphia the Penn Art collection at the University of Pennsylvania, the Woodmere Art Museum and the Princeton University Art Museum" which now needs referencing to confirm the contentTheroadislong (talk) 16:48, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I've done that. May I submit the article for review? If so, should I use the Submit or Resubmit prompt? DieHoren (talk) 21:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

I have simplified the links for you just click re-submit for review. Theroadislong (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks! Will do. DieHoren (talk) 23:36, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello DieHoren! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Working in Draft mode, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maurice Molarsky has been accepted

Maurice Molarsky, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with this. The article looks great, and I will now add categories at the bottom of the article.

Frank DieHoren (talk) 01:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)