Damifb

Redirect of Sri Ramendra Chandra Deva Sharma Bhattacharya

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sri Ramendra Chandra Deva Sharma Bhattacharya, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sri Ramendra Chandra Deva Sharma Bhattacharya is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sri Ramendra Chandra Deva Sharma Bhattacharya, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 15:30, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pup-play

I have nominated Pup-play, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pup-play. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Edison (talk) 00:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pup-play

I have nominated Pup-play, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pup-play (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mh29255 (talk) 06:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Damián A. Fernández Beanato

A tag has been placed on Damián A. Fernández Beanato requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Barcex (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Damián A. Fernández Beanato

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Damián A. Fernández Beanato, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? PeterCantropus (talk) 10:13, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beanato

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beanato, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PeterCantropus (talk) 21:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Madeleine y vos

Flaco, lo tuyo es patético. ¿El caso Madeleine McCann no te parece notable pero vos sí? Excelente periodista debés ser. Realmente toda esta historia me resultó insólita. ¡Incluirte como habitante célebre de Villa Devoto junto a Maradona! Si me llego a cruzar con vos en alguna redacción alguna vez, me voy a reir mucho. --PeterCantropus (talk) 04:26, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Diagnosis: Userpagious emptiosus

WELCOME

Greetings and Welcome! I noticed that your username shows up red when you post an edit -- in case you were wondering why, this is because your userpage is devoid of content. If you were to place anything at all on your userpage (text, photographs, etc.), your username would then appear blue by default. By convention, most contributing editors who intend on becoming a part of the Wikipedia family generally place information about themselves on their userpages to let people know a little about themselves. As a result, editors whose usernames are still red may (however unjustly, yet, nonetheless) appear to other editors as lacking a serious motivation in both editing Wikipedia articles as well as joining the Wikipedia community at large. Although it is not at all required, I therefore recommend that you place something on your userpage, such as information relating to your city of residence or occupation -- basically anything that will allow another editor to identify with you and peer into your mind a bit. You can check out other editors' userpages to get an idea of what is normally included (find them easiest by checking the history tab on randomly chosen yet substantial articles), and even copy/paste from other editors' userpages (modifying the information to reflect your own, of course). DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 22:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

File:Beanato in New York City.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beanato in New York City.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 23:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Kiuopatrai listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kiuopatrai. Since you had some involvement with the Kiuopatrai redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 21:06, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

"Baby stealer" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Baby stealer. Since you had some involvement with the Baby stealer redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:18, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

"Kaptar" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kaptar. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 8#Kaptar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hildeoc (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vishnupada

The article Vishnupada has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article. Searching the name Vishnupada only gets result about Temple or place with the same name, not the subject in question.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

"Great Sea-Centipede" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Great Sea-Centipede has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 3 § Great Sea-Centipede until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

"Preservation of the saints" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Preservation of the saints has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 1 § Preservation of the saints until a consensus is reached. Telikalive (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)