Album cover

edit

There is the possibility Image:The-carter-3-album-cover.jpg is the real album cover. He's apparantly "challenging hip hop's masculine imagery" judging by this MediaTakeOut source. But then again you can't really trust those rumour/gossip sites. Spellcast 21:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: Love Hate

edit

Hey, no problem. I've let him know on his talk page, noted the problem on the article talk page and also move protected the article for 3 weeks so only admins can move it. Call by if you need anything else!. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 22:40, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Love Hate

edit

First off, I was NOT blocked for 3RR because I did not do anything wrong. You, Ayolefyz, are just being plain stubborn. Just because it is does not fit your standards does NOT mean it is vandalism. The page, Love Hate is fine the way I had it. I changed the title to "Shawty Is Da Shit", because that is the way it shows on the album cover. I did NOT change it into a redirect. For example see T.I. vs. T.I.P. and Tha Blue Carpet Treatment by T.I. and Snoop Dogg. The tracks, "That's That Shit" and "Big Shit Poppin' (Do It)" are displayed in their original titles but link to "That's That" and "Big Things Poppin' (Do It)" respectively. You, Ayolefyz, need to take a closer look at what vanalism is and is not. A content dispute (i.e. what you and I have) is not vandalism. Is it unfortunate, yes. But it is not vandalism. You should take the time to assume good faith. Running to The G-Unit-Boss to get him to side with you is not the way to go. And neither is calling me an "idiot". While you accuse me of vandalism, you yourself have violated a Wikipedia policy which is, No personal attacks. Admc2006 (talk) 02:23, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

LOVE/HATE

edit

Dude for starters, mama is added on the album. Secondly the times out are the real times because hte album has been released. Webrips have been floating around for the past couple of days.

Thirdly the retail of hte album has just leaked.

Ihave listened to it and mamma is on itTrimy67 (talk) 02:20, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

dont deleate the Curtis album charting

edit

dont deleate the Curtis album charting... i took it from hiphop dx... and it took me a fuckin hour... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ron nizamov96 (talkcontribs) 21:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Request

edit

Ayo, can you have a look at Lupe Fiasco's The Cool? It's unsure whether the title is "Lupe Fiasco's The Cool" or just "The Cool". You're an expert at this stuff, so if you can comment at Talk:Lupe Fiasco's The Cool#Page name, that'd be great. I think it's just "The Cool", but I'm not 100% sure. Cheers. Spellcast (talk) 10:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

No problem

edit

After sending me those awesome beats you made, of course you can use the layout! (which I stole after seeing a random userpage) And yeah, happy X-mas and all the best for next year :D Spellcast (talk) 21:08, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, I hope you don't mind me replacing Image:Libra.svg. Spellcast (talk) 21:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

RE: Anon. vandalizing Tha Carter III

edit

Likewise! Keep up all the great work you're doing. The IP has edited a few more times, and I've reverted. If he does it again, I'll warn him for edit warring. GlassCobra 09:46, 26 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I protected the page. Sorry for not getting back to you quicker. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 12:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tha Carter III: The Leak

edit

Ayo, should this be deleted? Spellcast (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tha Carter III: The Leak

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Tha Carter III: The Leak, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tha Carter III: The Leak. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Street Ryders

edit

Hey, just so you know, the "is" in "Who the Fuck is That?" is not capitalized. Rappingwonders2 (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Way Mo' (Trilla)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Way Mo' (Trilla), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Way Mo' (Trilla). Rappingwonders (talk) 16:34, 20 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: Brass Knuckles protection

edit

Hey, Done :). Nice work there by the way. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 17:33, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

What up

edit

The Realest is back, need some help? --- Who's the one you call Mr. Macho? The head honcho, swift fist like Camacho 04:30, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Free (Ja Rule song)

edit
 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Free (Ja Rule song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

thanks for cleaning up the lil wayne carter 3 article. i did not know how to source

Tha Carter 3

edit

thanks for cleaning up the lil wayne carter 3 article. i did not know how to source —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ba11innnn (talkcontribs) 22:14, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

edits

edit

you have very good edits/pages by the way. -signed ba11innnn —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ba11innnn (talkcontribs) 01:25, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ego Trippin'

edit

Hi, I've noticed you've worked on a lot of albums articles, Curtis in particular, and I was wondering if you could possibly do me a favor. I have been trying to keep the Ego Trippin' page in order, yet the album has leaked, and people continue to cite it. I was just wondering if you could possibly check it over for me. If not, I understand, but thanks either way. --JpGrB 16:25, 2 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, but I thought we didn't use leaks? I'm probably mistaken, I was just wondering. --JpGrB 03:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Okay. And I'm sorry but one more question, how do you know what leaks are "official"? (I understand this is a dumb question, but I'd like it clarified, lol.) --JpGrB 03:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

U Play My Time

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article U Play My Time, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of U Play My Time. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 20:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Realest (Usher song)

edit
 

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article The Realest (Usher song), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 22:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

WikiSmile

edit

-WarthogDemon 04:52, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Brown Paper Bag

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brown Paper Bag, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Brown Paper Bag. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 21:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm fine with you cleaning up unprofessional reviews

edit

However I'm pretty sure the writers for NappyAfro.com get paid and I +know+ the writers for RapReviews.com get paid. Well written commissioned works for hire are just as relevant as Rolling Stone or Entertainment Weekly, perhaps more so since they are intimately familiar with the hip-hop they are writing about. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re: "A Millie" protection

edit

Hey, I protected it from new and unregistered users for 3 weeks. Keep up the good work!. --¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤ 20:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why are you removing album release dates?

edit

I cannot find anywhere in WP:ALBUM which says they can't be put in before the album's release. And to remove it with no source of it being pushed back is vandalism. Could you explain your actions please? Tom Danson (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Died in Your Arms

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Died in Your Arms, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Died in Your Arms. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 20:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can I get some help?

edit

Hello. And I thank you for reading this. I know you have been a major help to Wikipedia, and a major help to me in the past. I was wondering if you could possibly take a look at the The Black Wall Street Records page? If so, thank you, if not, I thank you anyway. --JpGrB 02:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Acquitted (album)

edit
 

I have nominated Acquitted (album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquitted (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -XxKibaxX Talk 01:12, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Acquitted (album)

edit
 

I have nominated Acquitted (album), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acquitted (album). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -XxKibaxX Talk 13:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of I'm So Hood

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, I'm So Hood, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm So Hood (2nd nomination). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Come & Go

edit
 

I have nominated Come & Go, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Come & Go. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Do U(knome)? yes...|or no · 22:52, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Hip Hop Post

edit

Hey I am a young hip hop blogger and I really appreciate your writings.

I recently started a hip hop website, it will not allow me to post the link but if you look up Thehiphopost.com it should come up, anyway, and I was wondering If maybe you would want to contribute.

Take a look...

If not thanks for viewing anyway and might you have any tips for me in the future? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chiclark36789 (talkcontribs) 04:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of When I Hustle

edit
 

I have nominated When I Hustle, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/When I Hustle. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- Suntag 05:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Bottle Poppin'

edit
 

I have nominated Bottle Poppin', an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle Poppin'. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- JediLofty Talk to meFollow me 13:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Return the Favor

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Return the Favor, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 12:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

An invitation to join WikiProject Ohio

edit

Proposed deletion of Ray Lavender

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ray Lavender, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable, fails WP:MUSIC.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SummerPhD (talk) 19:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Ray Lavender

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ray Lavender, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Lavender. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 13:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Redirect of Donkey Kong (song)

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Donkey Kong (song), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Donkey Kong (song) is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Donkey Kong (song), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The first Wikipedian meetup in Ohio

edit


Thanks! --Rkitko (talk) 19:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hip hop WikiProject Roll Call

edit

Hello, fellow Hip Hop WikiProject members!

This message is being sent out to let all listed members of the project know to re-add your name to the members list, as all current names on the list have been erased in order to find out who is still active on the project. WikiGuy86 (talk) 03:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

You're invited! Great Buckeye Wiknic 2016

edit
 

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Orphaned non-free image File:JayZ American Gangster Cover.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:JayZ American Gangster Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Street Ryders listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Street Ryders. Since you had some involvement with the Street Ryders redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Richhoncho (talk) 19:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply