User talk:Abishe/Archive 15
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Abishe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
TFA
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
Today's TFA, Felix M. Warburg House, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:55, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:07, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Jana Amin for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Amin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Women in Red June 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
June 2024
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
I'm pretty sure you already know this but, Lead is supposed to be short summary not that long as you did (see WP:LEAD)
Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 15:15, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
@Vestrian24Bio: I acknowledge your concerns which you have pointed out and as a result I have made a breakdown by trimming the paragraph into the sections in articles 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup Group A and under the background title in the article 2024 ICC Men's T20 World Cup. --Abishe (talk) 04:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Siri Kannangara
On 16 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Siri Kannangara, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 23:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ITN recognition for Hugh Aldons
On 3 July 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hugh Aldons, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 22:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
"Peter Selvaratnam" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Peter Selvaratnam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 23 § Peter Selvaratnam until a consensus is reached. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:15, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:55, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging {{subst:proposed deletion notify|1=Anjalika Wijesinghe|concern=Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Both cited sources are predominately based on [[WP:PST|primary sources, which lack any independent editorial oversight.}} Dan arndt (talk) 05:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
The article Anjalika Wijesinghe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Both cited sources are predominately based on primary sources, which lack any independent editorial oversight.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have removed the
{{proposed deletion/dated}}, commented on the talk page, and improved the presentation of the citation templates to make it clear that one of the citations you provided was from a newspaper, and the other was from a magazine. But yes, the article needs more work.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Anjalika Wijesinghe for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjalika Wijesinghe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The Signpost: 14 August 2024
- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Using some tool to generate these articles
Hi, I have just moved your two most recent articles to draft space and am checking a third one. A sentence like "She also faced stumbling blocks, obstacles and roadblocks for pursuing career prospect on racing as she faced rampant criticism in the society given it was quite an unorthodox passion to pursue considering her gender identity." makes me wonder whether you use some AI tool like ChatGPT, or some tool to paraphrase sources? I have noted an abundance of flowery language, weird constructions, and sometimes very close paraphrasing, coupled with factual issues, so it looks as if you need to take more care, slow down, and check your articles thoroughly. Fram (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
@Fram: Hi, I understand your basic thought process about this and I acknowledge about the misconception regarding my style of writing. First of all I pride myself being an ardent writer and I have the knack in writing. Actually speaking you are not the only person who has raised such an alarming concern over my style of writing. In fact, the place where I am currently employed at Amana Bank (Sri Lanka), my immediate supervisor gave me the exact feedback regarding my complex use of vocabulary, puffery and complex usage of words when compiling mails through Microsoft Outlook and she told me to focus on reducing the unnecessary jargons. I just wanted to elaborate you on why I am using these wordings as I have very often listened to the commentary lines used by cricket commentators like Ian Bishop (cricketer), Pommie Mbangwa, Michael Holding, Nasser Hussain, Michael Atherton, Mark Nicholas etc as they frequently use subtle wordings to exaggerate the emotions to capture the captivating breathtaking nailbiting moments in the sport of cricket. Since I have been frequently listening to their style of commentary, it has actually become part and parcel of my life to incorporate such wordings in my day to day activities. I know it is a lame excuse to even begin with but I have realised that my style of writing has gone to an extent where I have formulated trajectory by exaggerating certain events. For context, in cricket, commentators use certain wordings and technical wordings to aggravate the situations like "opening the face of the bat, impeccable timing, sublime timing, poetry in motion, he had all three stumps to aim at, elegant footwork, right on the blockhole, right on the money, firing on all cylinders, all guns blazing, taking the pace off the delivery, toe end of the bat, there is huge purchase for bowlers out there in the middle, graveyard of a pitch to bat on for the batters, bowlers are going to have a field day on this pitch, slightly overpitched, canny operator in the middle, nice backfoot punch through the offside, ability to rotate the strike and running between the wickets, weaved a magic and spinners spun web by wreaking havoc on the opposition batters, the soft dismissal opened the floodgates for the opposition to make inroads in the contest". I am fully aware about my shortcomings over this aspect and I am trying to figure out a way to tweak and modify the way I am going to express and pitch the content in the articles. I too faced this very same situation at Toastmasters where I delivered a lengthy speech over the advent of T20 cricket causing a rift among generations by including so many technical jargons that the common people would not understand and the speech failed to live up to the expectations as it never went in line with the set target audience. I am really having a dilemma on how to manage the way of writing articles in the future. I am definitely not using QuillBot or ChatGPT as insisted by you since I can write any articles and essays by incorporating such words even without referring to such sites. The main reason owing to this situation is that I am overly exposed to the commentary lines used by commentators which are forever etched in my memory and I am showing my eagerness to utilise those words in real life aspect. I understand this is going to backfire for me in the long run since not many people would have that level of patience to understand my insightful analysis. Abishe (talk) 16:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I'm glad that you aren't using any tools, but you will need to write more concisely, clearly and neutrally (and in your own words, not taking sentences from sources and reordering the words or inserting some synonyms, see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing). You wlll also need to listen to what others are saying: for example reposting the above at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anjalika Wijesinghe will only bewilder the other people in that discussion, as that wall of text has little if anything to do with the deletion discussion. Fram (talk) 06:57, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
Close paraphrasing / copyright violations
I said earlier that you should take care not to copy or closely paraphrase copyrighted sources. In your most recent creation, Krish Reddy, you e.g. write
- "In his illustrious career, he was predominantly well known for his unwavering commitment and dedication to collating and preserving the record of players prior to the unification of cricket in 1991, who would have largely otherwise unrecognized in segregated South Africa."
The source[1] says:
- "Best-known for his dedication to collating and preserving the records of players who were otherwise unrecognised in segregated South Africa"
The text "pre-eminent record keeper of black and non-racial cricket in South Africa" is taken straight from the same source" and "also served on the executive board of KwaZulu-Natal Cricket Union and worked as a selector in the region" are also taken straight from the source, while many other parts are closely paraphrased as well. I will nominate the page for deletion for that reason. Fram (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Krish Reddy
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Krish Reddy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.espncricinfo.com/story/krish-reddy-record-keeper-of-black-cricket-in-south-africa-dies-1340049. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:35, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Abishe and Fram: Hi Abishe. You are not a new Wikipedia editor. You are well aware of Wikipedia's copyright policies. Yet you made a choice to create an article in violation of them. I do understand why you created the article: as keen cricket fan, I must admit I looked the article, and thought to myself, "there must be some way to rescue this from speedy deletion". As as a WP:ADMIN, however, I was obliged to delete it. OK, this is is kind of unusual, but I would be happy to work with you to recreate the article. First of all: write it in your own words, and don't copy and paste from other websites. It's fine with me if you are minded to recreate Krish Reddy without going through the WP:AFC process. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 11:08, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
@Shirt58: @Fram: I definitely did not copy the contents as mentioned in Cricinfo and yes its my bad I just took the exact wordings here and there to incorporate them in my previously half-baked written article. I apologise for that as I ran out of ideas when I created that article yesterday on how to write a solid article since I had only a handful of sources to support the claim of my writing. Anyway I made another attempt in recreating the article about the same subject by starting it from scratch and I honestly wrote it in a better way so that it can be an interesting read. I apologise for the unfortunate incident which unfolded yesterday over the way I structured the article content. I really acknowledge that the previously written article did not live up to the expectations as intended and I this time rectified my mistake by not violating copyright infringement. Abishe (talk) 15:51, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Alaeddin Qassemi for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaeddin Qassemi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:55, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2024 August newsletter
The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.
Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:11, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
Women in Red October 2024
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Announcements from WikiProject Cricket
| ||
Annual newsletter to be lauchedWikiProject Cricket's annual newsletter titled The Stump Sapient is slated to be launched in December 2024. Following is a list of things that are to be included in the newsletter. Your contribution by editing the newsletter is appreciated.
Upcoming contests
Ongoing discussions
• Contribute to the newsletter • Subscribe to the newsletter • Join the WikiProject • Project discussions • Contests •
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:40, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Cricket Picture of the Year 2024 – Nominations open now!
| |||||||||||||||
– MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The article Death clock calculator has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Page is a malicious material as it does not have any links to credible sources (e.g., reference to the official research publication - https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-023-00573-5, or https://www.life2vec.dk), even though it mentions these in the main text. More than that, this article links to the 'scam website' - https://thecalculator.co, even though the article mentions that many scam websites exist). Thus, this article is more promotional material for https://thecalculator.co and in no way an article that provides any credible information.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
An epic barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| How are you able to create so many articles. Creating over 1000+ articles is a remarkable feat (very very small percentage does it). You are legendary! DareshMohan (talk) 07:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
@DareshMohan: Thank you for the appreciation and acknowledging my efforts. I think you are also doing an amazing work in writing many articles. I am so passionate about gaining knowledge and sharing knowledge to others in whatever capacity I could contribute eventhough I may have flaws from my end. I try to learn everyday because life never stops teaching. I still have to do a lot of research and create more articles. Abishe (talk) 07:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- The highlight is that many people use Wikipedia, but not many edit it — and I feel embarrassed for admitting I edit here. Many admins I think don't mass create articles -- I don't think you are admins. Any creating anywhere over 1,000 or more is very rare. I have many regrets in my life, but ... one day we all will make it. I don't think I can leave Wikipedia for video games or anything else, cause it is ok to be different. 😎 I also feel welcome here. Not sure if all of them introverts are here cause them extroverts busy socializing. DareshMohan (talk) 08:18, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@DareshMohan: Hi, I understand your thought process but you don't need to feel embarrassed to edit Wikipedia. You are doing a great job. Hopefully you will continue to do good work in Wikipedia and you have a great track record of 90,000+ edits in 3 years, you too have done a great job in terms of creating articles as you have created over 500 articles that's a great accomplishment and your edit count is a terrific record which speaks volume about your ability to showcase your talents and skillets by creating quality content. I feel those who are very much interested with Wikipedia and devote, allocate certain time slot to Wikipedia would value it as an integral part of their lives. I use Wikipedia as a stress relief and as a positive distraction from all the real life practical situations. I see it as a hobby and to positively impact myself to forget job stress and yeah obviously I am not much into socialising. I am also an introvert and with some extrovert characteristics, but I prefer to edit Wikipedia because I am so eager to write more and more articles. It's because of the thirst for general knowledge thing also it comes into my mind naturally. Every human is unique and make sure you do what you like because only you can decide the level of inner peace in you and only you understand your true passion. Don't compare yourself with others and be the person you are. We are all different and have different thinking patterns and belief systems. It is normal to worry about things and stuff which I do tend to think a lot. Socialising is sometimes difficult for me due to the need of meeting different kind of people who have different mindsets and most importantly it may not be easy to vibe with them as our taste could vary as well. Be true to yourself and do what is best for you. You are the CEO of your own life. Keep up your fine work. Abishe (talk) 09:45, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 October 28
I've raised your continued issues with coyvio / close paraphrasing, this time at Taifa-1, at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 October 28. Fram (talk) 12:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Tian Qi (cricketer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Admin noticeboard discussion
I started a discussion at WP:ANI#Abishe's problematic article creations, suggesting that your autopatrolled right would be removed and/or other sanctions. You are welcome to give your input there. Fram (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 November newsletter
The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is 
AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, 
BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, 
Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: 
Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, 
Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, 
BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, 
Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and 
AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!
The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
- Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.- Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.- Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
- BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
Choon Paan
That's a nice one! :) I've thought of writing that but never got around to doing it. Cheers! Chanaka L (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
@Chanakal: Choon Paan too was in my mind for a long time as I felt it could be apt to write about it for the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Asian Month/2024 competition, considering how Choon Paan is seen as sentimental element for majority of the Sri Lankans. Abishe (talk) 01:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Sahla Parveen for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahla Parveen (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.The Signpost: 6 November 2024
- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?