This is an archive of past discussions with User:Thecheesykid. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.
The pages I am deleting from are erroneous. You would be more useful if instead of reinstating false information you take the time to verify it. You do a disservice to Wikipedia which is why this website will eventually cease to exist because it's putting into business companies that can manage information properly since there is so much error on this site. Call the firm - what is on the page simply does not exist -there are funds that do not exist period. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Athena4071 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
The articles you are deleting content from have sources that provide references for the provided information. If content is unverifiable you could put a citation needed by the sentence you consider to be erroneous or delete it and add in an edit summary explaining that the information you've deleted is not correct. Also, at one point you completely blanked the page which lends your actions a slight amount of discredit, please do not do so in future. Thank you. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
suggestions for format changes to "Dreams of Joy" article
Thanks for your suggestions regarding format modifications. I'll definitely keep your ideas in mind. Yrral2008 (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Yrral2008
Patrick006
I apologize for not the quick editing that I did on List of Street Fighter characters I wanted to create a separate page for two more characters(Sakura and Balrog), each are quite popular among gamers. I will now complete the required editing. You can change it back if anything is wrong with the editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrick006 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Quite alright, I'll watch the articles and check your edits, but I'm sure you'll be fine. I'll put them on my Watchlist. Just try not to delete any info, unless it's necessary. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 20:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh wait, so he's going to improve them later? Should I leave those pages alone and stop reverting his edits, then? I guess it isn't helpful if I keep undoing everything... TheStickMan[✆Talk] 01:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
I've taken out a few paragraphs, but left the "list of characters"-appropriate in-universe material generally found on character lists. All the editor was trying to do was to transclude the information into the new articles but I'm not sure he was aware that it's best to leave some content on the main page to superficially explain the topic. It should be fine now, so all is well. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 01:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Be careful
You may want to be careful with what you use rollback on: take a look at this diff [1] — Chromancertalk/cont 21:07, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Oooh thanks for pointing that out to me... :/ Didn't spot that one, I work pretty fast but generally I notice my mistakes, this one escaped me. Cheers for reverting it for me. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 21:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Logging edit
I didn't delete the paragraph on clearcutting, I just moved it under the heading "logging methods" one paragraph below. I'm new to Wiki so will make sure to fill in the edit summary in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenbuilder11 (talk • contribs) 23:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Ah very well, sorry that's my mistake, in future either try filling in the edit summary as you say or do it all in one move so that it doesn't seem like deletion. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 23:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Well poop
I was not aware elderly citizens of Wisconsin could find me by my IP address. My edit was a joke I played on my friend, and I will not be so irresponsible again. Okay, maybe once or twice more, but not this year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.180.149.185 (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
It's cool. I've fixed it. I was also going to ask if you'd like me to negate the content removal notice you'd added to the IPs talk page but the talk page has been deleted. :/ LordVetinari (talk) 05:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Thank you...
... for clearing the graffiti from my Talk page. — Malik ShabazzTalk/Stalk 20:14, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
my edit wasn't verified but it was correct :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.6.98 (talk) 01:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hmmm, rather debatable that Edward Teller was trying to achieve "complete worldwide destruction." Seems like you'd need around 10 references and perhaps changing history might help? That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 01:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Here's to You, Mrs. Hammer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — chro • man • cer 03:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Please don't put nonsense in your edits. If you do it again, it looks as if you will be blocked. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 15:04, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
You have absolutely no authority to warn me for ANYTHING.
... so stay of my talk page. 50.80.139.102 (talk) 15:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Do you believe that somehow your actions are above reproach and therefore could not possibly be criticized or found to be incorrect? If you want to stay on the Wikipedian project, you are probably going to have to accept that you are not the reigning master of your edits or even your own talk page. The manner with which you comport yourself I find to be particularly vulgar and if you continue on this path of self-supremacism, believing that you can do whatever you want, you are going to find that other editors will start to notice you, and you will be blocked.
I am going to undo your edit removing the warnings from your talk page because they were put there for a reason. Also, "I have no authority", yes I do. You do too. All Wikipedians have the right to warn every other editor (so long as it is justified), we have the right to communicate. Which means that I will not "stay off your talk page" just because you believe that you have something no-one else does. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 16:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Don't Interfere in in these matters. Are you an Indian? If not don't interfere.
Indian politicians are no better than donkeys.
If you want to block me, block me. This is a dynamic IP, so what can you do???
Ha, ha!
59.95.28.236 (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
I'm not interfering, I'm reverting vandalism. I can't interfere, because to interfere with something is to change something that is private to begin with. There are no invitations as to who can and can't edit on Wikipedia. That's what's so wonderful about it.
Additionally, I am not Indian and they are most certainly not worse than donkeys... whatever the hell that means? That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 17:11, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:50.80.139.102. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I am aware that I may have acted harshly and for that I apologize, I just found it quite difficult to stay cool with such an individual. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 18:27, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Texasmoderncowboy
my edit was very constructive and is accurate. i like to give people the truth. Texasmoderncowboy (talk) 22:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
"Most of these students are whiter than paper, and come from very rich famiys so they are stuck up" is not the sort of thing you want on encyclopedias I'm afraid, please don't add such content again, or you may be blocked from editing. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Sorry about that cross-fire incident at Enda Kenny. Hope the sock eventually finds something better to do with their time. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
I didn't insult anyone except Sarah Palin on the Paul Revere page
She's not a Wikipedia user, so I don't know what you're talking about. 216.41.243.9 (talk) 23:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Check For Author Blanking
When reverting blanking (especially for small pages), remember to check if the blanker is the original author. If so, instead use {{db-author}}. I used to make the same mistake until someone corrected me. - Pingveno 23:19, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Oh, thank you, I'll make sure to check in future. I think I've received the same message about this underneath. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 23:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
So ya know
Some care needs to be applied when restoring blanked content. In this instance the article creator had blanked a page to which a speedy delete tag had been applied. New users can be confused when, as the result of being notified their article is being considered for deletion, they blank the content only to receive a warning that blanking is non-constructive or otherwise discouraged. I do appreciate the work you are doing and I hope you continue to help us. See ya 'round Tiderolls 23:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the note, I've also been told about this by User:Pingveno just above. On a sidenote, I'm not an administrator or a researcher and as such I can't see your link. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 23:26, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
I posted my message before seeing the previous one; apologies for piling on. You can't click on the link I provided? That's strange... Tiderolls 23:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Comes up with this message:
Unauthorized
The action you have requested is limited to users in one of the groups: Administrators, Researchers.
Ahhhh....the article's been deleted. My bad. It's not important anyway. I was just worried there might be some glitch. Thanks for your patience. Tiderolls 23:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
That's okay. Btw you keep beating me to the reversions. You're a good inspiration to work fast haha. That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 23:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
