Ulysses S. Grant (born Hiram Ulysses Grant;[a] April 27, 1822 – July 23, 1885) was the 18th president of the United States, serving from 1869 to 1877. In 1865, as commanding general, Grant led the Union Army to victory in the American Civil War.
Ulysses S. Grant | |
|---|---|
Grant c. 1870–1880 | |
| 18th President of the United States | |
| In office March 4, 1869 – March 4, 1877 | |
| Vice President |
|
| Preceded by | Andrew Johnson |
| Succeeded by | Rutherford B. Hayes |
| Commanding General of the U.S. Army | |
| In office March 9, 1864 – March 4, 1869 | |
| President |
|
| Preceded by | Henry Halleck |
| Succeeded by | William Tecumseh Sherman |
| Acting United States Secretary of War | |
| In office August 12, 1867 – January 14, 1868 | |
| President | Andrew Johnson |
| Preceded by | Edwin Stanton |
| Succeeded by | Edwin Stanton |
| President of the National Rifle Association | |
| In office 1883–1884[1] | |
| Preceded by | E. L. Molineux |
| Succeeded by | Philip Sheridan |
| Personal details | |
| Born | Hiram Ulysses Grant April 27, 1822 Point Pleasant, Ohio, U.S. |
| Died | July 23, 1885 (aged 63) Wilton, New York, U.S. |
| Resting place | Grant's Tomb, New York City |
| Political party | Republican |
| Spouse | |
| Children | |
| Parents | |
| Education | United States Military Academy |
| Occupation |
|
| Signature |  |
| Nicknames |
|
| Military service | |
| Branch/service | |
| Years of service |
|
| Rank | |
| Commands | |
| Battles/wars | |
Grant was born in Ohio and graduated from the United States Military Academy (West Point) in 1843. He served with distinction in the Mexican–American War, but resigned from the army in 1854 and returned to civilian life impoverished. In 1861, shortly after the Civil War began, Grant joined the Union Army and rose to prominence after securing victories in the western theater. In 1863, he led the Vicksburg campaign that gave Union forces control of the Mississippi River and dealt a major strategic blow to the Confederacy. President Abraham Lincoln promoted Grant to lieutenant general and command of all Union armies after his victory at Chattanooga. For thirteen months, Grant fought Robert E. Lee during the high-casualty Overland Campaign which ended with the capture of Lee's army at Appomattox, where he formally surrendered to Grant. In 1866, President Andrew Johnson promoted Grant to General of the Army. Later, Grant broke with Johnson over Reconstruction policies. A war hero, drawn in by his sense of duty, Grant was unanimously nominated by the Republican Party and then elected president in 1868.
As president, Grant stabilized the post-war national economy, supported congressional Reconstruction and the Fifteenth Amendment, and prosecuted the Ku Klux Klan. Under Grant, the Union was completely restored. An effective civil rights executive, Grant signed a bill to create the United States Department of Justice and worked with Radical Republicans to protect African Americans during Reconstruction. In 1871, he created the first Civil Service Commission, advancing the civil service more than any prior president. Grant was re-elected in the 1872 presidential election, but was inundated by executive scandals during his second term. His response to the Panic of 1873 was ineffective in halting the Long Depression, which contributed to the Democrats winning the House majority in 1874. Grant's Native American policy was to assimilate Indians into Anglo-American culture. In Grant's foreign policy, the Alabama Claims against Britain were peacefully resolved, but the Senate rejected Grant's annexation of Santo Domingo. In the disputed 1876 presidential election, Grant facilitated the approval by Congress of a peaceful compromise.
Leaving office in 1877, Grant undertook a world tour, becoming the first president to circumnavigate the world. In 1880, he was unsuccessful in obtaining the Republican nomination for a third term. In 1885, impoverished and dying of throat cancer, Grant wrote his memoirs, covering his life through the Civil War, which were posthumously published and became a major critical and financial success. At his death, Grant was the most popular American and was memorialized as a symbol of national unity. Due to the pseudohistorical and negationist mythology of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy spread by Confederate sympathizers around the turn of the 20th century, historical assessments and rankings of Grant's presidency suffered considerably before they began recovering in the 21st century. Grant's critics take a negative view of his economic mismanagement and the corruption within his administration, while his admirers emphasize his policy towards Native Americans, vigorous enforcement of civil and voting rights for African Americans, and securing North and South as a single nation within the Union.[2] Modern scholarship has better appreciated Grant's appointments of Cabinet reformers.
Early life and education
Grant's father Jesse Root Grant was a Whig Party supporter and a fervent abolitionist.[3] Jesse and Hannah Simpson were married on June 24, 1821, and their first child, Hiram Ulysses Grant, was born on April 27, 1822.[4] The name Ulysses was drawn from ballots placed in a hat. To honor his father-in-law, Jesse named the boy "Hiram Ulysses", though he always referred to him as "Ulysses".[5] In 1823, the family moved to Georgetown, Ohio, where five siblings were born: Simpson, Clara, Orvil, Jennie, and Mary.[6] At the age of five, Ulysses started at a subscription school and later attended two private schools.[7] In the winter of 1836–1837, Grant was a student at Maysville Seminary, and in the autumn of 1838, he attended John Rankin's academy.
In his youth, Grant developed an unusual ability to ride and manage horses;[8] his father gave him work driving supply wagons and transporting people.[9] Unlike his siblings, Grant was not forced to attend church by his Methodist parents.[10] For the rest of his life, he prayed privately and never officially joined any denomination.[11] To others, including his own son, Grant appeared to be agnostic.[12] Grant was largely apolitical before the war but wrote, "If I had ever had any political sympathies they would have been with the Whigs. I was raised in that school."[13]
Early military career and personal life
West Point and first assignment
At Jesse Grant's request, Representative Thomas L. Hamer nominated Ulysses to the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, in spring 1839. Grant was accepted on July 1.[14] Unfamiliar with Grant, Hamer altered his name, so Grant was enlisted under the name "U. S. Grant".[b][18] Since the initials "U.S." also stood for "Uncle Sam", he became known among army colleagues as "Sam."[19]
Initially, Grant was indifferent to military life, but within a year he reexamined his desire to leave the academy and later wrote that "on the whole I like this place very much".[20] He earned a reputation as the "most proficient" horseman.[21] Seeking relief from military routine, he studied under Romantic artist Robert Walter Weir, producing nine surviving artworks.[22] He spent more time reading books from the library than his academic texts.[23] On Sundays, cadets were required to march to services at the academy's church, which Grant disliked.[24] Quiet by nature, he established a few intimate friends among fellow cadets, including Frederick Tracy Dent and James Longstreet. He was inspired both by the Commandant, Captain Charles Ferguson Smith, and by General Winfield Scott, who visited the academy to review the cadets. Grant later wrote of the military life, "there is much to dislike, but more to like."[25]
Grant graduated on June 30, 1843, ranked 21st out of 39 in his class and was promoted the next day to brevet second lieutenant.[26] He planned to resign his commission after his four-year term. He would later write that among the happiest days of his life were the day he left the presidency and the day he left the academy.[27] Despite his excellent horsemanship, he was not assigned to the cavalry, but to the 4th Infantry Regiment.[c] Grant's first assignment was the Jefferson Barracks near St. Louis, Missouri.[29] Commanded by Colonel Stephen W. Kearny, this was the nation's largest military base in the West.[30] Grant was happy with his commander but looked forward to the end of his military service and a possible teaching career.[31]
Marriage and family
In 1844, Grant accompanied Frederick Dent to Missouri and met his family, including Dent's sister Julia. The two soon became engaged.[31] On August 22, 1848, they were married at Julia's home in St. Louis. Grant's abolitionist father disapproved of the Dents' owning slaves, and neither of Grant's parents attended the wedding.[32] Grant was flanked by three fellow West Point graduates in their blue uniforms, including Longstreet, Julia's cousin.[d][35]
The couple had four children: Frederick, Ulysses Jr. ("Buck"), Ellen ("Nellie"), and Jesse II.[36] After the wedding, Grant obtained a two-month extension to his leave and returned to St. Louis, where he decided that, with a wife to support, he would remain in the army.[37]
Mexican–American War
Grant's unit was stationed in Louisiana as part of the Army of Occupation under Major General Zachary Taylor.[38] In September 1846, President James K. Polk ordered Taylor to march 150 miles (240 km) south to the Rio Grande. Marching to Fort Texas, to prevent a Mexican siege, Grant experienced combat for the first time on May 8, 1846, at the Battle of Palo Alto.[39] Grant served as regimental quartermaster, but yearned for a combat role; when finally allowed, he led a charge at the Battle of Resaca de la Palma.[40] He demonstrated his equestrian ability at the Battle of Monterrey by volunteering to carry a dispatch past snipers; he hung off the side of his horse, keeping the animal between him and the enemy.[41] Polk, wary of Taylor's growing popularity, divided his forces, sending some troops (including Grant's unit) to form a new army under Major General Winfield Scott.[42]
Traveling by sea, Scott's army landed at Veracruz and advanced toward Mexico City.[43] They met the Mexican forces at the battles of Molino del Rey and Chapultepec.[44] For his bravery at Molino del Rey, Grant was brevetted first lieutenant on September 30.[45] At San Cosmé, Grant directed his men to drag a disassembled howitzer into a church steeple, then reassembled it and bombarded nearby Mexican troops.[44] His bravery and initiative earned him his brevet promotion to captain.[46] On September 14, 1847, Scott's army marched into the city; Mexico ceded the vast territory, including California, to the U.S. on February 2, 1848.[47] During the war, Grant established a commendable record as a daring and competent soldier and began to consider a career in the army.[48][49] He studied the tactics and strategies of Scott and Taylor and emerged as a seasoned officer, writing in his memoirs that this is how he learned much about military leadership.[50] In retrospect, although he respected Scott, he identified his own leadership style with Taylor's. Grant later believed the Mexican war was morally unjust and that the territorial gains were designed to expand slavery. He opined that the Civil War was divine punishment for U.S. aggression against Mexico.[51]
Historians have pointed to the importance of Grant's experience as an assistant quartermaster during the war. Although he was initially averse to the position, it prepared Grant in understanding military supply routes, transportation systems, and logistics, particularly with regard to "provisioning a large, mobile army operating in hostile territory", according to biographer Ronald White.[40] Grant came to recognize how wars could be won or lost by factors beyond the battlefield.[52]
Post-war assignments and resignation
Grant's first post-war assignments took him and Julia to Detroit on November 17, 1848, but he was soon transferred to Madison Barracks, a desolate outpost in upstate New York, in bad need of supplies and repair. After four months, Grant was sent back to his quartermaster job in Detroit.[53] When the discovery of gold in California brought prospectors and settlers to the territory, Grant and the 4th infantry were ordered to reinforce the small garrison there. Grant was charged with bringing the soldiers and a few hundred civilians from New York City to Panama, overland to the Pacific and then north to California. Julia, eight months pregnant with Ulysses Jr., did not accompany him.[54]
While Grant was in Panama, a cholera epidemic killed many soldiers and civilians. Grant organized a field hospital in Panama City, and moved the worst cases to a hospital barge offshore.[55] When orderlies protested having to attend to the sick, Grant did much of the nursing himself, earning high praise from observers.[54] In August, Grant arrived in San Francisco. His next assignment sent him north to Vancouver Barracks in the Oregon Territory.[56]
Grant tried several business ventures but failed, and in one instance his business partner absconded with $800 of Grant's investment, equivalent to $23,000 in 2023.[57] After he witnessed white agents cheating local Indians of their supplies, and their devastation by smallpox and measles transferred to them by white settlers, he developed empathy for their plight.[58]
Promoted to captain on August 5, 1853, Grant was assigned to command Company F, 4th Infantry, at the newly constructed Fort Humboldt in California.[59] Grant arrived at Fort Humboldt on January 5, 1854, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Robert C. Buchanan.[60] Separated from his family, Grant began to drink.[61] Colonel Buchanan reprimanded Grant for one drinking episode and told Grant to "resign or reform." Grant told Buchanan he would "resign if I don't reform."[62] On Sunday, Grant was found influenced by alcohol, but not incapacitated, at his company's paytable.[63] Keeping his pledge to Buchanan, Grant resigned, effective July 31, 1854.[64] Buchanan endorsed Grant's resignation but did not submit any report that verified the incident.[e][70] Grant did not face court-martial, and the War Department said: "Nothing stands against his good name."[71] Grant said years later, "the vice of intemperance (drunkenness) had not a little to do with my decision to resign."[72] With no means of support, Grant returned to St. Louis and reunited with his family.[73]
Civilian struggles, slavery, and politics
In 1854, at age 32, Grant entered civilian life, without any money-making vocation to support his growing family. It was the beginning of seven years of financial struggles and instability.[74] Grant's father offered him a place in the Galena, Illinois, branch of the family's leather business, but demanded Julia and the children stay in Missouri, with the Dents, or with the Grants in Kentucky. Grant and Julia declined. For the next four years, Grant farmed with the help of Julia's slave, Dan, on his brother-in-law's property, Wish-ton-wish, near St. Louis.[75] The farm was not successful and to earn a living he sold firewood on St. Louis street corners.[76]
In 1856, the Grants moved to land on Julia's father's farm, and built a home called "Hardscrabble" on Grant's Farm; Julia described it as an "unattractive cabin".[77] Grant's family had little money, clothes, and furniture, but always had enough food.[78] During the Panic of 1857, which devastated Grant as it did many farmers, Grant pawned his gold watch to buy Christmas gifts.[79] In 1858, Grant rented out Hardscrabble and moved his family to Julia's father's 850-acre plantation.[80] That fall, after having malaria, Grant gave up farming.[81]
That same year, Grant acquired a slave from his father-in-law, a thirty-five-year-old man named William Jones.[82] Although Grant was not an abolitionist at the time, he disliked slavery and could not bring himself to force an enslaved man to work.[83] In March 1859, Grant freed Jones by a manumission deed, potentially worth at least $1,000 (equivalent to $34,000 in 2023).[84]
Grant moved to St. Louis, taking on a partnership with Julia's cousin Harry Boggs working in the real estate business as a bill collector, again without success and at Julia's prompting ended the partnership.[85] In August, Grant applied for a position as county engineer. He had thirty-five notable recommendations, but Grant was passed over by the Free Soil and Republican county commissioners because he was believed to share his father-in-law's Democratic sentiments.[86]
In April 1860, Grant and his family moved north to Galena, accepting a position in his father's leather goods business, "Grant & Perkins", run by his younger brothers Simpson and Orvil. In a few months, Grant paid off his debts.[87] The family attended the local Methodist church and he soon established himself as a reputable citizen.[88]
Civil War
On April 12, 1861, the American Civil War began when Confederate troops attacked Fort Sumter in Charleston, South Carolina.[89] The news came as a shock in Galena, and Grant shared his neighbors' concern about the war.[90] On April 15, Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers.[91] The next day, Grant attended a mass meeting to assess the crisis and encourage recruitment, and a speech by his father's attorney, John Aaron Rawlins, stirred Grant's patriotism.[92] In an April 21 letter to his father, Grant wrote out his views on the upcoming conflict: "We have a government and laws and a flag, and they must all be sustained. There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots."[93]
Early commands
On April 18, Grant chaired a second recruitment meeting, but turned down a captain's position as commander of the newly formed militia company, hoping his experience would aid him to obtain a more senior rank.[94] His early efforts to be recommissioned were rejected by Major General George B. McClellan and Brigadier General Nathaniel Lyon. On April 29, supported by Congressman Elihu B. Washburne of Illinois, Grant was appointed military aide to Governor Richard Yates and mustered ten regiments into the Illinois militia. On June 14, again aided by Washburne, Grant was appointed colonel and put in charge of the 21st Illinois Volunteer Infantry Regiment;[95] he appointed John A. Rawlins as his aide-de-camp and brought order and discipline to the regiment. Soon after, Grant and the 21st Regiment were transferred to Missouri to dislodge Confederate forces.[96]
On August 5, with Washburne's aid, Grant was appointed brigadier general of volunteers.[97] Major General John C. Frémont, Union commander of the West, passed over senior generals and appointed Grant commander of the District of Southeastern Missouri.[98] On September 2, Grant arrived at Cairo, Illinois, assumed command by replacing Colonel Richard J. Oglesby, and set up his headquarters to plan a campaign down the Mississippi, and up the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers.[99]
After the Confederates moved into western Kentucky, taking Columbus, with designs on southern Illinois, Grant notified Frémont and, without waiting for his reply, advanced on Paducah, Kentucky, taking it without a fight on September 6.[100] Having understood the importance to Lincoln of Kentucky's neutrality, Grant assured its citizens, "I have come among you not as your enemy, but as your friend."[101] On November 1, Frémont ordered Grant to "make demonstrations" against the Confederates on both sides of the Mississippi, but prohibited him from attacking.[102]
Belmont (1861), Forts Henry and Donelson (1862)
On November 2, 1861, Lincoln removed Frémont from command, freeing Grant to attack Confederate soldiers encamped in Cape Girardeau, Missouri.[102] On November 5, Grant, along with Brigadier General John A. McClernand, landed 2,500 men at Hunter's Point, and on November 7 engaged the Confederates at the Battle of Belmont.[103] The Union army took the camp, but the reinforced Confederates under Brigadier Generals Frank Cheatham and Gideon J. Pillow forced a chaotic Union retreat.[104] Grant had wanted to destroy Confederate strongholds at Belmont, Missouri, and Columbus, Kentucky, but was not given enough troops and was only able to disrupt their positions. Grant's troops escaped back to Cairo under fire from the fortified stronghold at Columbus.[105] Although Grant and his army retreated, the battle gave his volunteers much-needed confidence and experience.[106]
Columbus blocked Union access to the lower Mississippi. Grant and lieutenant colonel James B. McPherson planned to bypass Columbus and move against Fort Henry on the Tennessee River. They would then march east to Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River, with the aid of gunboats, opening both rivers and allowing the Union access further south. Grant presented his plan to Henry Halleck, his new commander in the newly created Department of Missouri.[107] Halleck rebuffed Grant, believing he needed twice the number of troops. However, after consulting McClellan, he finally agreed on the condition that the attack would be in close cooperation with the navy Flag Officer, Andrew H. Foote.[108] Foote's gunboats bombarded Fort Henry, leading to its surrender on February 6, 1862, before Grant's infantry even arrived.[109]
Grant ordered an immediate assault on Fort Donelson, which dominated the Cumberland River. Unaware of the garrison's strength, Grant, McClernand, and Smith positioned their divisions around the fort. The next day McClernand and Smith independently launched probing attacks on apparent weak spots but were forced to retreat. On February 14, Foote's gunboats began bombarding the fort, only to be repulsed by its heavy guns. The next day, Pillow attacked and routed McClernand's division. Union reinforcements arrived, giving Grant a total force of over 40,000 men. Grant was with Foote four miles away when the Confederates attacked. Hearing the battle, Grant rode back and rallied his troop commanders, riding over seven miles of freezing roads and trenches, exchanging reports. When Grant blocked the Nashville Road, the Confederates retreated back into Fort Donelson.[110] On February 16, Foote resumed his bombardment, signaling a general attack. Confederate generals John B. Floyd and Pillow fled, leaving the fort in command of Simon Bolivar Buckner, who submitted to Grant's demand for "unconditional and immediate surrender".[111]
Grant had won the first major victory for the Union, capturing Floyd's entire army of more than 12,000. Halleck was angry that Grant had acted without his authorization and complained to McClellan, accusing Grant of "neglect and inefficiency". On March 3, Halleck sent a telegram to Washington complaining that he had no communication with Grant for a week. Three days later, Halleck claimed "word has just reached me that ... Grant has resumed his bad habits (of drinking)."[112] Lincoln, regardless, promoted Grant to major general of volunteers and the Northern press treated Grant as a hero. Playing off his initials, they took to calling him "Unconditional Surrender Grant".[113]
Shiloh (1862) and aftermath
Reinstated by Halleck at the urging of Lincoln and Secretary of War Edwin Stanton, Grant rejoined his army with orders to advance with the Army of the Tennessee into Tennessee. His main army was located at Pittsburg Landing, while 40,000 Confederate troops converged at Corinth, Mississippi.[114] Grant wanted to attack the Confederates at Corinth, but Halleck ordered him not to attack until Major General Don Carlos Buell arrived with his division of 25,000.[115] Grant prepared for an attack on the Confederate army of roughly equal strength. Instead of preparing defensive fortifications, they spent most of their time drilling the largely inexperienced troops while Sherman dismissed reports of nearby Confederates.[116]
On the morning of April 6, 1862, Grant's troops were taken by surprise when the Confederates, led by Generals Albert Sidney Johnston and P. G. T. Beauregard, struck first "like an Alpine avalanche" near Shiloh church, attacking five divisions of Grant's army and forcing a confused retreat toward the Tennessee River.[117] Johnston was killed and command fell upon Beauregard.[118] One Union line held the Confederate attack off for several hours, giving Grant time to assemble artillery and 20,000 troops near Pittsburg Landing.[119] The Confederates finally broke and captured a Union division, but Grant's newly assembled line held the landing, while the exhausted Confederates, lacking reinforcements, halted their advance.[120][f]
Bolstered by 18,000 troops from the divisions of Major Generals Buell and Lew Wallace, Grant counterattacked at dawn the next day and regained the field, forcing the disorganized and demoralized rebels to retreat to Corinth.[122] Halleck ordered Grant not to advance more than one day's march from Pittsburg Landing, stopping the pursuit.[123] Although Grant had won the battle, the situation was little changed.[124] Grant, now realizing that the South was determined to fight, would later write, "Then, indeed, I gave up all idea of saving the Union except by complete conquest."[125]
Shiloh was the costliest battle in American history to that point and the staggering 23,746 casualties stunned the nation.[126] Briefly hailed a hero for routing the Confederates, Grant was soon mired in controversy.[127] The Northern press castigated Grant for shockingly high casualties, and accused him of drunkenness during the battle, contrary to the accounts of those with him at the time.[128] Discouraged, Grant considered resigning but Sherman convinced him to stay.[129] Lincoln dismissed Grant's critics, saying "I can't spare this man; he fights."[130] Grant's costly victory at Shiloh ended any chance for the Confederates to prevail in the Mississippi valley or regain its strategic advantage in the West.[131]
Halleck arrived from St. Louis on April 11, took command, and assembled a combined army of about 120,000 men. On April 29, he relieved Grant of field command and replaced him with Major General George Henry Thomas. Halleck slowly marched his army to take Corinth, entrenching each night.[132] Meanwhile, Beauregard pretended to be reinforcing, sent "deserters" to the Union Army with that story, and moved his army out during the night, to Halleck's surprise when he finally arrived at Corinth on May 30.[133]
Halleck divided his combined army and reinstated Grant as field commander on July 11.[134] Later that year, on September 19, Grant's army defeated Confederates at the Battle of Iuka, then successfully defended Corinth, inflicting heavy casualties.[135] On October 25, Grant assumed command of the District of the Tennessee.[136] In November, after Lincoln's preliminary Emancipation Proclamation, Grant ordered units under his command to incorporate former slaves into the Union Army, giving them clothes, shelter, and wages for their services.[137]
Vicksburg campaign (1862–1863)
The Union capture of Vicksburg, the last Confederate stronghold on the Mississippi River, was considered vital as it would split the Confederacy in two.[138] Lincoln appointed McClernand for the job, rather than Grant or Sherman.[139] Halleck, who retained power over troop displacement, ordered McClernand to Memphis, and placed him and his troops under Grant's authority.[140]
On November 13, 1862, Grant captured Holly Springs and advanced to Corinth.[141] His plan was to attack Vicksburg overland, while Sherman would attack Vicksburg from Chickasaw Bayou.[142] However, Confederate cavalry raids on December 11 and 20 broke Union communications and recaptured Holly Springs, preventing Grant and Sherman from converging on Vicksburg.[143] McClernand reached Sherman's army, assumed command, and independently of Grant led a campaign that captured Confederate Fort Hindman.[144] After the sack of Holly Springs, Grant considered and sometimes adopted the strategy of foraging the land,[145] rather than exposing long Union supply lines to enemy attack.[146]
Fugitive African-American slaves poured into Grant's district, whom he sent north to Cairo to be domestic servants in Chicago. However, Lincoln ended this when Illinois political leaders complained.[147] On his own initiative, Grant set up a pragmatic program and hired Presbyterian chaplain John Eaton to administer contraband camps.[148] Freed slaves picked cotton that was shipped north to aid the Union war effort. Lincoln approved and Grant's program was successful.[149] Grant also worked freed black labor on a canal to bypass Vicksburg, incorporating the laborers into the Union Army and Navy.[150]
Grant's war responsibilities included combating illegal Northern cotton trade and civilian obstruction.[151][g] He had received numerous complaints about Jewish speculators in his district.[154] The majority, however, of those involved in illegal trading were not Jewish.[155] To help combat this, Grant required two permits, one from the Treasury and one from the Union Army, to purchase cotton.[152] On December 17, 1862, Grant issued a controversial General Order No. 11, expelling "Jews, as a class", from his military district.[156] After complaints, Lincoln rescinded the order on January 3, 1863. Grant finally ended the order on January 17. He later described issuing the order as one of his biggest regrets.[h][160]
On January 29, 1863, Grant assumed overall command. To bypass Vicksburg's guns, Grant slowly advanced his Union army south through water-logged terrain.[161] The plan of attacking Vicksburg from downriver was risky because, east of the river, his army would be distanced from most of its supply lines,[162] and would have to rely on foraging. On April 16, Grant ordered Admiral David Dixon Porter's gunboats south under fire from the Vicksburg batteries to meet up with troops who had marched south down the west side of the river.[163] Grant ordered diversionary battles, confusing Pemberton and allowing Grant's army to move east across the Mississippi.[164] Grant's army captured Jackson. Advancing west, he defeated Pemberton's army at the Battle of Champion Hill on May 16, forcing their retreat into Vicksburg.[165]
After Grant's men assaulted the entrenchments twice, suffering severe losses, they settled in for a siege which lasted seven weeks. During quiet periods of the campaign, Grant would drink on occasion.[166] The personal rivalry between McClernand and Grant continued until Grant removed him from command when he contravened Grant by publishing an order without permission.[167] Pemberton surrendered Vicksburg to Grant on July 4, 1863.[168]
Vicksburg's fall gave Union forces control of the Mississippi River and split the Confederacy. By that time, Grant's political sympathies fully coincided with the Radical Republicans' aggressive prosecution of the war and emancipation of the slaves.[169] The success at Vicksburg was a morale boost for the Union war effort.[167] When Stanton suggested Grant be brought east to run the Army of the Potomac, Grant demurred, writing that he knew the geography and resources of the West better and he did not want to upset the chain of command in the East.[170]
Chattanooga (1863) and promotion
On October 16, 1863, Lincoln promoted Grant to major general in the regular army and assigned him command of the newly formed Division of the Mississippi, which comprised the Armies of the Ohio, the Tennessee, and the Cumberland.[171] After the Battle of Chickamauga, the Army of the Cumberland retreated into Chattanooga, where they were partially besieged.[172] Grant arrived in Chattanooga, where plans to resupply and break the partial siege had already been set. Forces commanded by Major General Joseph Hooker, which had been sent from the Army of the Potomac, approached from the west and linked up with other units moving east from inside the city, capturing Brown's Ferry and opening a supply line to the railroad at Bridgeport.[173]
Grant planned to have Sherman's Army of the Tennessee, assisted by the Army of the Cumberland, assault the northern end of Missionary Ridge and roll down it on the enemy's right flank. On November 23, Major General George Henry Thomas surprised the enemy in open daylight, advancing the Union lines and taking Orchard Knob, between Chattanooga and the ridge. The next day, Sherman failed to get atop Missionary Ridge, which was key to Grant's plan of battle. Hooker's forces took Lookout Mountain in unexpected success.[174] On the 25th, Grant ordered Thomas to advance to the rifle-pits at the base of Missionary Ridge after Sherman's army failed to take Missionary Ridge from the northeast.[175] Four divisions of the Army of the Cumberland, with the center two led by Major General Philip Sheridan and Brigadier General Thomas J. Wood, chased the Confederates out of the rifle-pits at the base and, against orders, continued the charge up the 45-degree slope and captured the Confederate entrenchments along the crest, forcing a hurried retreat.[176] The decisive battle gave the Union control of Tennessee and opened Georgia, the Confederate heartland, to Union invasion.[177]
On March 2, 1864, Lincoln promoted Grant to lieutenant general, giving him command of all Union Armies.[178] Grant's new rank had previously been held only by George Washington.[179] Grant arrived in Washington on March 8 and was formally commissioned by Lincoln the next day at a Cabinet meeting.[180] Grant developed a good working relationship with Lincoln, who allowed Grant to devise his own strategy.[181]
Grant established his headquarters with General George Meade's Army of the Potomac in Culpeper, Virginia, and met weekly with Lincoln and Stanton in Washington.[182] After protest from Halleck, Grant scrapped a risky invasion of North Carolina and planned five coordinated Union offensives to prevent Confederate armies from shifting troops along interior lines.[183] Grant and Meade would make a direct frontal attack on Robert E. Lee's Army of Northern Virginia, while Sherman—now in command of all western armies—would destroy Joseph E. Johnston's Army of Tennessee and take Atlanta.[184] Major General Benjamin Butler would advance on Lee from the southeast, up the James River, while Major General Nathaniel Banks would capture Mobile.[185] Major General Franz Sigel was to capture granaries and rail lines in the fertile Shenandoah Valley.[186] Grant now commanded 533,000 battle-ready troops spread out over an eighteen-mile front.[187]
Overland Campaign (1864)
The Overland Campaign was a series of brutal battles fought in Virginia during May and June 1864.[188] Sigel's and Butler's efforts failed, and Grant was left alone to fight Lee.[189] On May 4, Grant led the army from his headquarters towards Germanna Ford.[190] They crossed the Rapidan unopposed.[191] On May 5, the Union army attacked Lee in the battle of the Wilderness, a three-day battle with estimated casualties of 17,666 Union and 11,125 Confederate.[192]
Rather than retreat, Grant flanked Lee's army to the southeast and attempted to wedge his forces between Lee and Richmond at Spotsylvania Court House.[193] Lee's army got to Spotsylvania first and a costly battle ensued, lasting thirteen days, with heavy casualties.[194] On May 12, Grant attempted to break through Lee's Muleshoe salient guarded by Confederate artillery, resulting in one of the bloodiest assaults of the Civil War, known as the Bloody Angle.[195] Unable to break Lee's lines, Grant again flanked the rebels to the southeast, meeting at North Anna, where a battle lasted three days.[196]
Cold Harbor
The recent bloody Wilderness campaign had severely diminished Confederate morale;[197] Grant believed breaking through Lee's lines at its weakest point, Cold Harbor, a vital road hub that linked to Richmond, would mean a quick end to the war.[198] Grant already had two corps in position at Cold Harbor with Hancock's corps on the way.[199]
Lee's lines were extended north and east of Richmond and Petersburg for approximately ten miles, but at several points there were no fortifications built yet, including Cold Harbor. On June 1 and 2 both Grant and Lee were waiting for reinforcements to arrive. Hancock's men had marched all night and arrived too exhausted for an immediate attack that morning. Grant postponed the attack until 5 p.m., and then again until 4:30 a.m. on June 3. However, Grant and Meade did not give specific orders for the attack, leaving it up to the corps commanders to coordinate. Grant had not yet learned that overnight Lee had hastily constructed entrenchments to thwart any breach attempt at Cold Harbor.[200] Grant was anxious to make his move before the rest of Lee's army arrived. On the morning of June 3, with a force of more than 100,000 men, against Lee's 59,000, Grant attacked, not realizing that Lee's army was now well entrenched, much of it obscured by trees and bushes.[201] Grant's army suffered 12,000–14,000 casualties, while Lee's army suffered 3,000–5,000 casualties, but Lee was less able to replace them.[202]
The unprecedented number of casualties heightened anti-war sentiment in the North. After the battle, Grant wanted to appeal to Lee under the white flag for each side to gather up their wounded, most of them Union soldiers, but Lee insisted that a total truce be enacted and while they were deliberating all but a few of the wounded died in the field.[203] Without giving an apology for the disastrous defeat in his official military report, Grant confided in his staff after the battle and years later wrote in his memoirs that he "regretted that the last assault at Cold Harbor was ever made."[204]
Siege of Petersburg (1864–1865)
Undetected by Lee, Grant moved his army south of the James River, freed Butler from the Bermuda Hundred, and advanced toward Petersburg, Virginia's central railroad hub,[205] resulting in a nine-month siege. Northern resentment grew. Sheridan was assigned command of the Union Army of the Shenandoah and Grant directed him to "follow the enemy to their death" in the Shenandoah Valley.[206] After Grant's abortive attempt to capture Petersburg, Lincoln supported Grant in his decision to continue.[207]
Grant had to commit troops to check Confederate General Jubal Early's raids in the Shenandoah Valley, which were getting dangerously close to Washington.[208] By late July, at Petersburg, Grant reluctantly approved a plan to blow up part of the enemy trenches from a tunnel filled with gunpowder. The massive explosion instantly killed an entire Confederate regiment.[209] The poorly led Union troops under Major General Ambrose Burnside and Brigadier General James H. Ledlie, rather than encircling the crater, rushed into it. Recovering from the surprise, Confederates, led by Major General William Mahone,[210] surrounded the crater and easily picked off Union troops. The Union's 3,500 casualties outnumbered the Confederates' three-to-one. The battle marked the first time that Union black troops, who endured a large proportion of the casualties, engaged in any major battle in the east.[211] Grant admitted that the tactic had been a "stupendous failure".[212]
Grant would later meet with Lincoln and testify at a court of inquiry against Generals Burnside and Ledlie for their incompetence.[213] In his memoirs, he blamed them for that disastrous Union defeat.[214] Rather than fight Lee in a full-frontal attack as he had done at Cold Harbor, Grant continued to force Lee to extend his defenses south and west of Petersburg, better allowing him to capture essential railroad links.[208]
Union forces soon captured Mobile Bay and Atlanta and now controlled the Shenandoah Valley, ensuring Lincoln's reelection in November.[215] Sherman convinced Grant and Lincoln to allow his army to march on Savannah.[216] Sherman cut a 60-mile (97 km) path of destruction unopposed, reached the Atlantic Ocean, and captured Savannah on December 22.[217] On December 16, after much prodding by Grant, the Union Army under Thomas smashed John Bell Hood's Confederates at Nashville.[218] These campaigns left Lee's forces at Petersburg as the only significant obstacle remaining to Union victory.[219]
By March 1865, Lee was trapped and his strength severely weakened.[220] He was running out of reserves to replace the high battlefield casualties and remaining Confederate troops, no longer having confidence in their commander and under the duress of trench warfare, deserted by the thousands.[221] On March 25, in a desperate effort, Lee sacrificed his remaining troops (4,000 Confederate casualties) at Fort Stedman, a Union victory and the last Petersburg line battle.
Surrender of Lee and Union victory (1865)
On April 2, Grant ordered a general assault on Lee's forces; Lee abandoned Petersburg and Richmond, which Grant captured.[222] A desperate Lee and part of his army attempted to link up with the remnants of Joseph E. Johnston's army. Sheridan's cavalry stopped the two armies from converging, cutting them off from their supply trains.[223] Grant sent his aide Orville Babcock to carry his last dispatch to Lee demanding his surrender.[224] Grant immediately rode west, bypassing Lee's army, to join Sheridan who had captured Appomattox Station, blocking Lee's escape route. On his way, Grant received a letter from Lee stating Lee would surrender his army.[225]
On April 9, Grant and Lee met at Appomattox Court House.[226] Although Grant felt depressed at the fall of "a foe who had fought so long and valiantly," he believed the Southern cause was "one of the worst for which a people ever fought."[227] Grant wrote out the terms of surrender: "each officer and man will be allowed to return to his home, not to be disturbed by U.S. authority so long as they observe their paroles and the laws in force where they may reside." Lee immediately accepted Grant's terms and signed the surrender document, without any diplomatic recognition of the Confederacy. Lee asked that his former Confederate troops keep their horses, which Grant generously allowed.[228][229] Grant ordered his troops to stop all celebration, saying the "war is over; the rebels are our countrymen again."[230] Johnston's Tennessee army surrendered on April 26, 1865, Richard Taylor's Alabama army on May 4, and Kirby Smith's Texas army on May 26, ending the war.[231]
Lincoln's assassination
On April 14, 1865, Grant attended a cabinet meeting in Washington. Lincoln invited him and his wife Julia to Ford's Theatre but they declined, because they planned to travel to their home in Burlington. In a conspiracy that also targeted top cabinet members in one last effort to topple the Union, Lincoln was shot by John Wilkes Booth at the theater and died the next morning.[232] Many, including Grant himself, thought that Grant had been a target in the plot, and during the subsequent trial, the government tried to prove that Grant had been stalked by Booth's conspirator Michael O'Laughlen.[233] Stanton notified Grant of the president's death and summoned him to Washington. Vice President Andrew Johnson was sworn in as president on April 15.[234][i] Grant was determined to work with Johnson, and he privately expressed "every reason to hope" in the new president's ability to run the government "in its old channel".[235]
Commanding generalship (1865–1869)
At the war's end, Grant remained commander of the army, with duties that included dealing with Emperor Maximilian and French troops in Mexico, enforcement of Reconstruction in the former Confederate states, and supervision of Indian wars on the western Plains.[236] After the Grand Review of the Armies, Lee and his generals were indicted for treason in Virginia. Johnson demanded they be put on trial, but Grant insisted that they should not be tried, citing his Appomatox amnesty. Charges against Lee were dropped.[237][238] Grant secured a house for his family in Georgetown Heights in 1865 but instructed Elihu Washburne that for political purposes his legal residence remained in Galena, Illinois.[239] On July 25, 1866, Congress promoted Grant to the newly created rank of General of the Army of the United States.[240]
Tour of the South
President Johnson's Reconstruction policy included a speedy return of the former Confederates to Congress, reinstating white people to office in the South, and relegating black people to second-class citizenship.[241] On November 27, 1865, Grant was sent by Johnson on a fact-finding mission to the South, to counter a pending less favorable report by Senator Carl Schurz which reported that white people in the South harbored resentment of the North, and that black people suffered from violence and fraud.[242] Grant recommended continuation of the Freedmen's Bureau, which Johnson opposed, but advised against using black troops.[243]
Grant believed the people of the South were not ready for self-rule and required federal government protection. Concerned that the war led to diminished respect for civil authorities, he continued using the Army to maintain order.[244] Grant's report on the South, which he later recanted, sympathized with Johnson's Reconstruction policies.[245] Although Grant desired former Confederates be returned to Congress, he advocated eventual black citizenship. On December 19, the day after the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment was announced in the Senate, Johnson's response used Grant's report, read aloud to the Senate, to undermine Schurz's final report and Radical opposition to Johnson's policies.[246]
Break from Johnson
Grant was initially optimistic about Johnson.[247] Despite differing styles, the two got along cordially and Grant attended cabinet meetings concerning Reconstruction.[247] By February 1866, the relationship began to break down.[248] Johnson opposed Grant's closure of the Richmond Examiner for disloyal editorials and his enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, passed over Johnson's veto.[248] Needing Grant's popularity, Johnson took Grant on his "Swing Around the Circle" tour, a failed attempt to gain national support for lenient policies toward the South.[249] Grant privately called Johnson's speeches a "national disgrace" and he left the tour early.[250] On March 2, 1867, overriding Johnson's veto, Congress passed the first of three Reconstruction Acts, using military officers to enforce the policy.[251] Protecting Grant, Congress passed the Command of the Army Act, preventing his removal or relocation, and forcing Johnson to pass orders through Grant.[252]
In August 1867, bypassing the Tenure of Office Act, Johnson discharged Secretary of War Edwin Stanton without Senate approval and appointed Grant ad interim Secretary of War. Stanton was the only remaining cabinet member friendly to the Radicals. Although Grant initially recommended against dismissing Stanton, he accepted the position, not wanting the Army to fall under a conservative appointee who would impede Reconstruction, and managed an uneasy partnership with Johnson.[253]
In December 1867, Congress voted to keep Stanton, who was reinstated by a Senate Committee on January 10, 1868. Grant told Johnson he was going to resign the office to avoid fines and imprisonment. Johnson, who believed the law would be overturned, said he would assume Grant's legal responsibility, and reminded Grant that he had promised to delay his resignation until a suitable replacement was found.[254] The following Monday, not willing to wait for the law to be overturned, Grant surrendered the office to Stanton, causing confusion with Johnson.[255] With the backing of his cabinet, Johnson accused Grant of lying and "duplicity" at a stormy cabinet meeting, while a shocked and disappointed Grant felt it was Johnson who was lying.[256] The publication of angry messages between Grant and Johnson led to a complete break between them.[257] The controversy led to Johnson's impeachment and trial in the Senate; he was acquitted by one vote.[258] Grant's popularity rose among the Radical Republicans and his nomination for the presidency appeared certain.[259]
Election of 1868
At the 1868 Republican National Convention, the delegates unanimously nominated Grant for president on the first ballot and Speaker of the House Schuyler Colfax for vice president on the fifth.[260] Although Grant had preferred to remain in the army, he accepted the Republican nomination, believing that he was the only one who could unify the nation.[261] The Republicans advocated "equal civil and political rights to all" and African American enfranchisement.[262] The Democrats, having abandoned Johnson, nominated former governor Horatio Seymour of New York for president and Francis P. Blair of Missouri for vice president. The Democrats opposed suffrage for African Americans and advocated the immediate restoration of former Confederate states to the Union and amnesty from "all past political offenses".[263][264]
Grant played no overt role during the campaign and was joined by Sherman and Sheridan in a tour of the West that summer.[265] However, the Republicans adopted his words "Let us have peace" as their campaign slogan.[266] Grant's 1862 General Order No. 11 became an issue during the presidential campaign; he sought to distance himself from the order, saying "I have no prejudice against sect or race, but want each individual to be judged by his own merit."[267] The Democrats and their Klan supporters focused mainly on ending Reconstruction, intimidating black people and Republicans, and returning control of the South to the white Democrats and the planter class, alienating War Democrats in the North.[268] Grant won the popular vote and an Electoral College landslide of 214 votes to Seymour's 80.[269] Seymour received a majority of white voters, but Grant was aided by 500,000 votes cast by black people,[270] winning him 52.7 percent of the popular vote.[271] He lost Louisiana and Georgia, primarily due to Ku Klux Klan violence against African-American voters.[272] At the age of 46, Grant was the youngest president yet elected.[273]
Presidency (1869–1877)
On March 4, 1869, Grant was sworn in as President by Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase. In his inaugural address, Grant urged the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment; many African Americans attended his inauguration.[274] He urged that bonds issued during the Civil War should be paid in gold, called for "proper treatment" of Native Americans and encouraged their "civilization and ultimate citizenship".[275]
Grant's cabinet appointments sparked both criticism and approval.[276] He appointed Elihu B. Washburne Secretary of State and John A. Rawlins Secretary of War.[277] Washburne resigned, and Grant appointed him Minister to France. Grant then appointed former New York Senator Hamilton Fish Secretary of State.[277] Rawlins died in office, and Grant appointed William W. Belknap Secretary of War.[278] Grant appointed New York businessman Alexander T. Stewart Secretary of Treasury, but Stewart was found legally ineligible by a 1789 law.[279] Grant then appointed Massachusetts Representative George S. Boutwell Secretary of Treasury.[277] Philadelphia businessman Adolph E. Borie was appointed Secretary of Navy, but found the job stressful and resigned.[280] Grant then appointed New Jersey's attorney general, George M. Robeson, Secretary of Navy.[281] Former Ohio Governor Jacob D. Cox (Interior), former Maryland Senator John Creswell (Postmaster-General), and Ebenezer Rockwood Hoar (Attorney General) rounded out the cabinet.[282]
Grant nominated Sherman to succeed him as general-in-chief and gave him control over war bureau chiefs.[283] When Rawlins took over the War Department he complained that Sherman was given too much authority. Grant reluctantly revoked his order, upsetting Sherman and damaging their friendship. James Longstreet, a former Confederate general, was nominated for Surveyor of Customs of New Orleans; this was met with amazement, and seen as a genuine effort to unite the North and South.[284] In March 1872, Grant signed legislation that established Yellowstone National Park, the first national park.[285] Grant was sympathetic to women's rights, including suffrage, saying he wanted "equal rights to all citizens".[286]
To make up for his infamous General Order No. 11, Grant appointed more than fifty Jewish people to federal office, including consuls, district attorneys, and deputy postmasters. He appointed Edward S. Salomon territorial governor of Washington, the first time an American Jewish man occupied a governor's seat. In November 1869, reports surfaced of Alexander II of Russia penalizing 2,000 Jewish families for smuggling by expelling them to the interior of the country. In response, Grant publicly supported the Jewish American B'nai B'rith petition against Alexander.[287] In 1875, Grant proposed a constitutional amendment that limited religious indoctrination in public schools.[288] Schools would be for all children "irrespective of sex, color, birthplace, or religions".[289] Grant's views were incorporated into the Blaine Amendment, but it was defeated by the Senate.[290]
In October 1871, under the Morrill Act, using federal marshals, Grant prosecuted hundreds of Utah Territory Mormon polygamists.[291] Grant called polygamy a "crime against decency and morality".[292] In 1874, Grant signed into law the Poland Act, which made Mormon polygamists subject to trial in District Courts and limited Mormons on juries.[292]
Beginning in March 1873, under the Comstock Act, Grant prosecuted pornographers, in addition to abortionists. To administer the prosecutions, Grant put in charge a vigorous anti-vice activist and reformer Anthony Comstock.[293] Comstock headed a federal commission and was empowered to destroy obscene material and hand out arrest warrants to offenders.[292]
Reconstruction
Grant was considered an effective civil rights president, concerned about the plight of African Americans.[294] On March 18, 1869, Grant signed into law equal rights for black people, to serve on juries and hold office, in Washington D.C., and in 1870 he signed the Naturalization Act that gave foreign black people citizenship.[294] During his first term, Reconstruction took precedence. Republicans controlled most Southern states, propped up by Republican-controlled Congress, northern money, and southern military occupation.[295] Grant advocated the ratification of the Fifteenth Amendment that said states could not disenfranchise African Americans.[296] Within a year, the three remaining states—Mississippi, Virginia, and Texas—adopted the new amendment—and were admitted to Congress.[297] Grant put military pressure on Georgia to reinstate its black legislators and adopt the amendment.[298] Georgia complied, and on February 24, 1871, its senators were seated in Congress, with all former Confederate states represented, the Union was completely restored under Grant.[j][300] Under Grant, for the first time in history, Black-American men served in the United States Congress, all from the Southern states.[301]
In 1870, to enforce Reconstruction, Congress and Grant created the Justice Department that allowed the Attorney General and the new Solicitor General to prosecute the Klan.[302] Congress and Grant passed three Enforcement Acts, designed to protect black people and Reconstruction governments.[303] Using the Enforcement Acts, Grant crushed the Klan.[304] By October, Grant suspended habeas corpus in part of South Carolina and sent federal troops to help marshals, who initiated prosecutions.[305] Grant's Attorney General, Amos T. Akerman, who replaced Hoar, was zealous to destroy the Klan.[306] Akerman and South Carolina's U.S. marshal arrested over 470 Klan members, while hundreds of Klansmen, fled the state.[307] By 1872, the Klan's power had collapsed, and African Americans voted in record numbers in the South.[k][309] Attorney General George H. Williams, Akerman's replacement, suspended prosecutions of the Klan in 1873, but prior to the election of 1874, changed course and prosecuted the Klan.[l][313]
During Grant's second term, the North retreated from Reconstruction, while southern conservatives called "Redeemers" formed armed groups, the Red Shirts and the White League, who openly used violence, intimidation, voter fraud, and racist appeals to overturn Republican rule.[314] Northern apathy toward black people, the depressed economy and Grant's scandals made it politically difficult for the administration to maintain support for Reconstruction. Power shifted when the House was taken over by Democrats in the 1874 election.[315] Grant ended the Brooks–Baxter War, bringing Reconstruction in Arkansas to a peaceful conclusion. He sent troops to New Orleans in the wake of the Colfax massacre and disputes over the election of Governor William Pitt Kellogg.[316][317]
By 1875, Redeemer Democrats had taken control of all but three Southern states. As violence against black Southerners escalated, Grant's Attorney General Edwards Pierrepont told Republican Governor Adelbert Ames of Mississippi that the people were "tired of the autumnal outbreaks in the South", and declined to intervene directly.[318] Grant later regretted not issuing a proclamation to help Ames, having been told Republicans in Ohio would bolt the party if he did.[319] Grant told Congress in January 1875 he could not "see with indifference Union men or Republicans ostracized, persecuted, and murdered."[320] Congress refused to strengthen the laws against violence but instead passed the sweeping Civil Rights Act of 1875 to guarantee black people access to public facilities.[321] However, there was little enforcement and the Supreme Court ruled the law unconstitutional in 1883.[322] In 1876, Grant dispatched troops to South Carolina to keep Republican Governor Daniel Henry Chamberlain in office.[323] After Grant left office, the Compromise of 1877 meant Republicans obtained the White House for Rutherford B. Hayes in return for ending enforcement of racial equality for black people and removing federal troops from the South,[324] marking the end of Reconstruction.[325]
Financial affairs
Soon after taking office, Grant took conservative steps to return the economy to pre-war monetary standards.[326] During the War, Congress had authorized the Treasury to issue banknotes that, unlike the rest of the currency, were not backed by gold or silver. These "greenbacks" were necessary to pay the war debts, but caused inflation and forced gold-backed money out of circulation.[327] On March 18, 1869, Grant signed the Public Credit Act of 1869, which guaranteed bondholders would be repaid in "coin or its equivalent". The act committed the government to the full return of the gold standard within ten years.[328] This followed a policy of "hard currency, economy and gradual reduction of the national debt." Grant's own ideas about the economy were simple, and he relied on the advice of businessmen.[326]
Gold corner conspiracy
In April 1869, railroad tycoons Jay Gould and Jim Fisk conspired to corner the gold market in New York.[329] They controlled the Erie Railroad, and a high gold price would allow foreign agriculture buyers to purchase exported crops, shipped east over the Erie's routes.[330] Boutwell's policy of selling gold from the Treasury biweekly, however, kept gold artificially low.[331] Unable to corrupt Boutwell, the schemers built a relationship with Grant's brother-in-law, Abel Corbin, and gained access to Grant.[332] Gould bribed Assistant Treasurer Daniel Butterfield to gain inside information into the Treasury.[333]
In July, Grant reduced the sale of Treasury gold to $2,000,000 per month.[334] Fisk told Grant his gold selling policy would destroy the nation.[335] By September, Grant, who was naive regarding finance, was convinced a low gold price would help farmers, and the sale of gold for September was not decreased.[336] On September 23, when the gold price reached 143+1⁄8, Boutwell rushed to the White House and talked with Grant.[337] On September 24, known as Black Friday, Grant ordered Boutwell to sell, whereupon Boutwell wired Butterfield to sell $4,000,000 in gold.[338] The bull market at Gould's Gold Room collapsed, the price plummeted from 160 to 133+1⁄3, a bear market panic ensued, Gould and Fisk fled, and economic damages lasted months.[339] By January 1870, the economy resumed its post-war recovery.[m][341]
Foreign affairs
Grant had limited foreign policy experience, so relied heavily on his talented Secretary of State Hamilton Fish. Grant and Fish had cordial friendship. Besides Grant, the main players in foreign affairs were Fish and the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee Charles Sumner. Sumner, who hated Grant, led the opposition to Grant's plan to annex Santo Domingo, despite fully supporting annexation of Alaska.[342]
Grant had an expansionist impulse to protect American interests abroad and was a strong advocate of the Monroe Doctrine.[343] For instance, when Tomás Frías became President of Bolivia in 1872, Grant stressed the importance of maintaining good relations between Bolivia and the US.[344] He had an idealist side to his foreign policy. For instance, Grant appointed a Jewish lawyer, Benjamin F. Peixotto, U.S. Consul in Bucharest, in response to the Romanian persecution of Jews. Grant said that respect "for human rights is the first duty for those set as rulers" over the nations.[345]
Treaty of Washington (1871)
The most pressing diplomatic problem in 1869 was the settlement of the Alabama Claims, depredations caused to Union merchant ships by the Confederate warship CSS Alabama, built in a British shipyard in violation of neutrality rules.[346] Fish played the central role in formulating and implementing the Treaty of Washington and the Geneva arbitration (1872).[347] Senator Charles Sumner led the demand for reparations, with talk of British Columbia as payment.[348] Sumner, among other politicians, argued that British complicity in arms delivery to the Confederacy via blockade runners prolonged the war.[349] Fish and Treasurer George Boutwell convinced Grant that peaceful relations with Britain were essential, and the two nations agreed to negotiate.[350]
To avoid jeopardizing negotiations, Grant refrained from recognizing Cuban rebels who were fighting for independence from Spain, which would have been inconsistent with American objections to the British granting belligerent status to Confederates.[n][326] A commission in Washington produced a treaty whereby an international tribunal would settle the damage amounts; the British admitted regret, but not fault.[351] The Senate, including Grant critics Sumner and Carl Schurz, approved the Treaty of Washington, which settled disputes over fishing rights and maritime boundaries.[352] The Alabama Claims settlement was Grant's most successful foreign policy achievement, securing peace with Great Britain.[353] The settlement ($15,500,000) of the Alabama claims resolved troubled Anglo-American issues and turned Britain into America's strongest ally.[354]
Korean expedition (1871)
In 1871, a U.S. expedition was sent to Korea to open up trade with a country which had a policy that excluded trading with foreign powers, and to learn the fate of U.S. merchant ship SS General Sherman, which had disappeared up the Taedong River in 1866.[355] Grant dispatched a land and naval force consisting of five warships and over 1,200 men, under Admiral John Rodgers, to support a diplomatic delegation, led by US ambassador to China, Frederick Low, sent to negotiate trade and political relations.[355]
On June 1, the American ships entered the Ganghwa Straits on the Han River and, as foreign ships were barred from entering the river, onshore Korean garrisons fired upon the ships, but little damage was done. When Rodgers demanded an apology and to begin treaty negotiations, the Korean government refused.[356] On June 10, Rodgers destroyed several Korean forts, culminating in the Battle of Ganghwa, at which 250 Koreans were killed with a loss of 3 Americans.[356] The expedition failed to open up trade and merely strengthened Korea's isolationist policy.[357]
Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic)
In 1869, Grant initiated his plan to annex the Dominican Republic, then called Santo Domingo.[358] Grant believed acquisition would increase the United States' natural resources, and strengthen U.S. naval protection to enforce the Monroe Doctrine, safeguard against British obstruction of U.S. shipping and protect a future oceanic canal, stop slavery in Cuba and Brazil, while black people in the United States would have a safe haven from "the crime of Klu Kluxism".[359]
Joseph W. Fabens, an American speculator who represented Buenaventura Báez, the president of the Dominican Republic, met with Secretary Fish and proposed annexation.[360] On July 17, Grant sent a military aide Orville E. Babcock to evaluate the islands' resources, local conditions, and Báez's terms for annexation, but gave him no diplomatic authority.[361] When Babcock returned to Washington with unauthorized annexation treaties, Grant pressured his cabinet to accept them.[362] Grant ordered Fish to draw up formal treaties, sent to Báez by Babcock's return to the island nation. The Dominican Republic would be annexed for $1.5 million and Samaná Bay would be lease-purchased for $2 million. Generals D.B. Sackett and Rufus Ingalls accompanied Babcock.[363] On November 29, President Báez signed the treaties. On December 21, the treaties were placed before Grant and his cabinet.[364]
Grant's plan, however, was obstructed by Senator Charles Sumner.[365] On December 31, Grant met with Sumner at Sumner's home to gain his support for annexation. Grant left confident that Sumner approved, but what Sumner actually said was disputed by various witnesses. Without appealing to the American public, Grant submitted the treaties on January 10, 1870, to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Sumner, for ratification, but Sumner shelved the bills.[366] Prompted by Grant to stop stalling the treaties, Sumner's committee took action but rejected the bills by a 5-to-2 vote. Sumner opposed annexation and reportedly said the Dominicans were "a turbulent, treacherous race" in a closed session of the Senate.[367] Sumner sent the treaties for a full Senate vote, while Grant personally lobbied other senators. Despite Grant's efforts, the Senate defeated the treaties.[368]
Grant was outraged, and on July 1, 1870, he sacked his appointed Minister to Great Britain, John Lothrop Motley, Sumner's friend and ally.[369] In January 1871, Grant signed a joint resolution to send a commission to investigate annexation.[370] He chose three neutral parties, with Frederick Douglass to be secretary of the commission, that gave Grant the moral high ground from Sumner.[371] Although the commission approved its findings, the Senate remained opposed, forcing Grant to abandon further efforts.[372] Seeking retribution, in March 1871, Grant maneuvered to have Sumner deposed from his powerful Senate chairmanship.[373] The stinging controversy over Santo Domingo overshadowed Grant's foreign diplomacy.[353] Critics complained of Grant's reliance on military personnel to implement his policies.[363]
Cuba and Virginius Affair
American policy under Grant was to remain neutral during the Ten Years' War (1868–78) in Cuba against Spanish rule. On the recommendation of Fish and Sumner, Grant refused to recognize the rebels, in effect endorsing Spanish colonial rule, while calling for the abolition of slavery in Cuba.[374][375] This was done to protect American commerce and to keep peace with Spain.[375]
This fragile policy was broken in October 1873, when a Spanish cruiser captured a merchant ship, Virginius, flying the U.S. flag, carrying supplies and men to aid the insurrection. Treating them as pirates, Spanish authorities executed 53 prisoners without trial, including eight Americans. American Captain Joseph Frye and his crew were executed and their bodies mutilated. Enraged Americans called for war with Spain. Grant ordered U.S. Navy Squadron warships to converge on Cuba. On November 27, Fish reached a diplomatic resolution in which Spain's president, Emilio Castelar y Ripoll, expressed his regret, surrendered the Virginius and the surviving captives. Spain paid $80,000 to the families of the executed Americans.[376][377]
Free trade with Hawaii
In the face of strong opposition from Democrats, Grant and Fish secured a free trade treaty in 1875 with Hawaii, incorporating its sugar industry into the U.S. economic sphere.[378] To secure the agreement, King Kalākaua made a 91-day state visit, the first reigning monarch to set foot in the United States.[379] Despite opposition from Southern Democrats, who wanted to protect American rice and sugar producers, and Democrats, who believed the treaty to be an island annexation attempt and referred to the Hawaiians as an "inferior" race, a bill implementing the treaty passed Congress.[380]
The treaty gave free access to the U.S. market for sugar and other products grown in Hawaii from September 1876. The U.S. gained lands in the area known as Puʻu Loa for what would become known as the Pearl Harbor naval base. The treaty led to large investment by Americans in sugar plantations in Hawaii.[381]
Federal Indian policy
When Grant took office in 1869, the nation's more than 250,000 Native Americans were governed by 370 treaties.[382] Grant's faith influenced his "peace" policy, believing that the "Creator" did not place races of men on earth for the "stronger" to destroy the "weaker".[383] Grant was mostly an assimilationist, wanting Native Americans to adopt European customs, practices, and language, and accept democratic government, leading to eventual citizenship.[384][385] At Grant's 1869 Inauguration, Grant said "I will favor any course towards them which tends to their civilization, Christianization and ultimate citizenship."[385] Grant appointed Ely S. Parker, an assimilated Seneca and member of his wartime staff, as the Commissioner of Indian Affairs, the first Native American to serve in this position, surprising many.[386][385]
In April 1869, Grant signed legislation establishing an unpaid Board of Indian Commissioners to reduce corruption and oversee the implementation of his "Peace" policy,[387] aimed to replace entrepreneurs serving as Native American agents with missionaries and to protect Native Americans on reservations and educate them in farming.[388]
In 1870, a setback in Grant's policy occurred over the Marias Massacre, causing public outrage.[389] In 1871, Grant ended the sovereign tribal treaty system; by law individual Native Americans were deemed wards of the federal government.[390] Grant's policy was undermined by Parker's resignation in 1871, denominational infighting among religious agents, and entrenched economic interests.[391] Nonetheless, Indian wars declined overall during Grant's first term, and on October 1, 1872, Major General Oliver Otis Howard negotiated peace with the Apache leader Cochise.[392] On December 28, 1872, another setback took place when General George Crook and the 5th Cavalry massacred about 75 Yavapai Apache Indians at Skeleton Cave, Arizona.[393]
On April 11, 1873, Major General Edward Canby was killed in North California by Modoc leader Kintpuash.[394] Grant ordered restraint. The army captured Kintpuash and his followers, who were convicted of Canby's murder and hanged on October 3, while the remaining Modoc were relocated to the Indian Territory.[394] The beginning of the Indian Wars has been dated to this event.[395]
In 1874, the army defeated the Comanche at the Battle of Palo Duro Canyon, forcing them to settle at the Fort Sill reservation in 1875.[396] Grant pocket-vetoed a bill in 1874 protecting bison and instead supported Interior Secretary Columbus Delano, who correctly believed killing bison would force Plains Indians to abandon their nomadic lifestyle.[397] In April 1875, another setback occurred: the U.S. Army massacred 27 Cheyenne Indians in Kansas.[398]
With the lure of gold discovered in the Black Hills and the westward force of Manifest Destiny, white settlers trespassed on Sioux protected lands. Red Cloud reluctantly entered negotiations on May 26, 1875, but other Sioux chiefs readied for war.[399] Grant told the Sioux leaders to make "arrangements to allow white persons to go into the Black Hills" and that their children would attend schools, speak English, and prepare "for the life of white men."[384]
On November 3, 1875, under advice from Sheridan, Grant agreed not to enforce excluding miners from the Black Hills, forcing Native Americans onto the Sioux reservation.[400] Sheridan told Grant that the U.S. Army was undermanned and the territory involved was vast, requiring many soldiers.[401]
During the Great Sioux War that started after Sitting Bull refused to relocate to agency land, warriors led by Crazy Horse massacred George Armstrong Custer and his men at the Battle of the Little Big Horn. Angry white settlers demanded retribution. Grant castigated Custer in the press, saying "I regard Custer's massacre as a sacrifice of troops, brought on by Custer himself, that was wholly unnecessary."[402] In September and October 1876, Grant persuaded the tribes to relinquish the Black Hills. Congress ratified the agreement three days before Grant left office in 1877.[403]
In spite of Grant's peace efforts, over 200 battles were fought with Native Americans during his presidency. Grant's peace policy survived Custer's death, even after Grant left office in 1877; Indian policy remained under the Interior Department rather than the War Department.[404] The policy was considered humanitarian for its time but later criticized for disregarding tribal cultures.[405]
Election of 1872 and second term
The Liberal Republicans—reformers, men who supported low tariffs, and those who opposed Grant's prosecution of the Klan—broke from Grant and the Republican Party.[406] The Liberals disliked Grant's alliance with Senators Simon Cameron and Roscoe Conkling, considered to be spoilsmen politicians.[407]
In 1872, the Liberals nominated Horace Greeley, a New York Tribune editor and enemy of Grant, for president, and Missouri governor B. Gratz Brown, for vice president.[408] The Liberals denounced Grantism, corruption, and inefficiency, and demanded withdrawal of federal troops from the South, literacy tests for black voters, and amnesty for Confederates.[409] The Democrats adopted the Greeley-Brown ticket and the Liberals party platform.[410] Greeley pushed the themes that the Grant administration was failed and corrupt.[411]
The Republicans nominated Grant for reelection, with Senator Henry Wilson of Massachusetts as the vice presidential nominee.[o][413] The Republicans shrewdly borrowed from the Liberal platform, including "extended amnesty, lowered tariffs, and embraced civil service reform."[414] Grant lowered customs duties, gave amnesty to Confederates, and implemented a civil service merit system, neutralizing the opposition.[415] To placate the burgeoning suffragist movement, the Republican platform said women's rights would be treated with "respectful consideration."[416] Concerning Southern policy, Greeley advocated that local government control be given to white people, while Grant advocated federal protection of black people.[417] Grant was supported by Frederick Douglass, prominent abolitionists, and Indian reformers.[418]
Grant won reelection easily thanks to federal prosecution of the Klan, a strong economy, debt reduction, and lowered tariffs and taxes.[419] He received 56% of the vote and an Electoral College landslide (286 to 66).[420][421] Most African Americans in the South voted for Grant, while Democratic opposition remained mostly peaceful.[422] Grant lost in six former slave states that wanted an end to Reconstruction.[423] He proclaimed the victory as a personal vindication, but felt betrayed by the Liberals.[424]
Grant was sworn in by Salmon P. Chase on March 4, 1873. In his second inaugural address, he focused on what he considered the chief issues: freedom and fairness for all Americans and the benefits of citizenship for freed slaves. Grant concluded his address: "My efforts in the future will be directed towards the restoration of good feelings between the different sections of our common community".[p][426] Wilson died in office on November 22, 1875.[427] With Wilson's loss, Grant relied on Fish's guidance more than ever.[428]
Panic of 1873 and loss of House
Grant signed the Coinage Act of 1873, effectively ending the legal basis for bimetallism.[429] The Coinage Act discontinued the standard silver dollar and established the gold dollar as the monetary standard; because the gold supply did not increase as quickly as the population, the result was deflation. Silverites, who wanted more money in circulation to raise the prices farmers received, denounced the move as the "Crime of 1873", claiming deflation made debts more burdensome for farmers.[430]
Economic turmoil renewed during Grant's second term. In September 1873, Jay Cooke & Company, a New York brokerage house, collapsed after it failed to sell all the bonds issued by Northern Pacific Railway. Other banks and brokerages that owned railroad stocks and bonds were ruined.[431][432] Grant, who knew little about finance, traveled to New York to consult leading businessmen on how to resolve the crisis, which became known as the Panic of 1873.[433] Grant believed that, as with the collapse of the Gold Ring in 1869, the panic was merely an economic fluctuation.[434] He instructed the Treasury to buy $10 million in government bonds, which curbed the panic, but the Long Depression, swept the nation.[433] Eighty-nine of the nation's 364 railroads went bankrupt.[435]
In 1874, hoping inflation would stimulate the economy, Congress passed the Ferry Bill.[436] Many farmers and workingmen favored the bill, which would have added $64 million in greenbacks to circulation, but some Eastern bankers opposed it because it would have weakened the dollar.[437] Belknap, Williams, and Delano told Grant a veto would hurt Republicans in the November elections. Grant believed the bill would destroy the credit of the nation and vetoed it despite their objections. Grant's veto placed him in the Republican conservative faction and began the party's commitment to a gold-backed dollar.[438] Grant later pressured Congress for a bill to strengthen the dollar by gradually reducing the greenbacks in circulation. When the Democrats gained a majority in the House after the 1874 elections, the lame-duck Republican Congress did so before the Democrats took office.[439] On January 14, 1875, Grant signed the Specie Payment Resumption Act, which required reduction of greenbacks allowed to circulate and declared that they would be redeemed for gold beginning on January 1, 1879.[440]
Reforms and scandals
The post-Civil War economy brought on massive industrial wealth and government expansion. Speculation, lifestyle extravagance, and corruption in federal offices were rampant.[441] All of Grant's executive departments were investigated by Congress.[442] Grant by nature was honest, trusting, gullible, and loyal to his friends. His responses to malfeasance were mixed: at times appointing cabinet reformers, others defending culprits.[443]
Grant in his first term appointed Secretary of Interior Jacob D. Cox, who implemented civil service reform, including firing unqualified clerks.[444] On October 3, 1870, Cox resigned after a dispute with Grant over handling of a mining claim.[445] Authorized by Congress on March 3, 1871, Grant created and appointed the first Civil Service Commission.[446] Grant's Commission created rules for competitive exams for appointments, ending mandatory political assessments and classifying positions into grades.[447][q]
In November 1871, Grant's appointed New York Collector, Thomas Murphy, resigned. Grant replaced him with Chester A. Arthur, who implemented Boutwell's reforms.[449] A Senate committee investigated the New York Customs House in 1872. Previous Grant appointed collectors Murphy and Moses H. Grinnell charged lucrative fees for warehouse space, without the legal requirement of listing the goods.[450] This led to Grant firing warehouse owner George K. Leet, for pocketing the exorbitant freight fees.[451] Boutwell's reforms included stricter record-keeping and that goods be stored on company docks.[450] Grant ordered prosecutions by Attorney General George H. Williams and Secretary of Treasury Boutwell of persons accepting and paying bribes.[452]
On March 3, 1873, Grant signed into law an appropriation act that increased pay for federal employees, Congress (retroactive), the judiciary, and the president.[453][450] Grant's annual salary doubled to $50,000. Critics derided Congress' two-year retroactive $4,000 payment for each Congressman, and the law was partially repealed. Grant kept his much-needed pay raise, while his reputation remained intact.[454][450]
In 1872, Grant signed into law an act that ended private moiety (tax collection) contracts, but an attached rider allowed three more contracts.[455] Boutwell's assistant secretary William A. Richardson hired John B. Sanborn to go after "individuals and cooperations" who allegedly evaded taxes. Sanborn aggressively collected $213,000, while splitting $156,000 to others, including Richardson, and the Republican Party campaign committee.[456][450] During an 1874 Congressional investigation, Richardson denied involvement, but Sanborn said he met with Richardson over the contracts.[457] Congress severely condemned Richardson's permissive manner. Grant appointed Richardson judge of the Court of Claims, and replaced him with reformer Benjamin Bristow.[458] In June, Grant and Congress abolished the moiety system.[459]
Bristow tightened up the Treasury's investigation force, implemented civil service, and fired hundreds of corrupt appointees.[460] Bristow discovered Treasury receipts were low, and launched an investigation that uncovered the notorious Whiskey Ring, that involved collusion between distillers and Treasury officials to evade millions in taxes.[461][462] In mid-April, Bristow informed Grant of the ring. On May 10, Bristow struck hard and broke the ring.[463] Federal marshals raided 32 installations nationwide, leading to 110 convictions and $3,150,000 in fines.[464]
cartoon on Bristow's Whiskey Ring investigation
Grant appointed David Dyer, under Bristow's recommendation, federal attorney to prosecute the Ring in St. Louis, who indicted Grant's friend General John McDonald, supervisor of Internal Revenue.[465] Grant endorsed Bristow's investigation, writing on a letter "Let no guilty man escape..."[466] Bristow's investigation discovered Babcock received kickback payments, and that Babcock had secretly forewarned McDonald, the ring's mastermind, of the investigation.[467] On November 22, the jury convicted McDonald.[468] On December 9, Babcock was indicted; Grant refused to believe in Babcock's guilt and was ready to testify in Babcock's favor, but Fish warned that doing so would put Grant in the embarrassing position of testifying against a case prosecuted by his own administration.[469] Instead, on February 12, 1876, Grant gave a deposition in Babcock's defense, expressing that his confidence in his secretary was "unshaken".[470] Grant's testimony silenced all but his strongest critics.[471]
The St. Louis jury acquitted Babcock, and Grant allowed him to remain at the White House. However, after Babcock was indicted in a frame-up of a Washington reformer, called the Safe Burglary Conspiracy, Grant dismissed him. Babcock kept his position of Superintendent of Public Buildings in Washington.[472][450]
The Interior Department under Secretary Columbus Delano, whom Grant appointed to replace Cox, was rife with fraud and corruption. The exception was Delano's effective oversight of Yellowstone. Grant reluctantly forced Delano's resignation. Surveyor General Silas Reed had set up corrupt contracts that benefited Delano's son, John Delano.[473] Grant's Secretary of Interior Zachariah Chandler, who succeeded Delano in 1875, implemented reforms, fired corrupt agents and ended profiteering.[474] When Grant was informed by Postmaster Marshall Jewell of a potential Congressional investigation into an extortion scandal involving Attorney General George H. Williams' wife, Grant fired Williams and appointed reformer Edwards Pierrepont. Grant's new cabinet appointments temporarily appeased reformers.[475]
After the Democrats took control of the House in 1875, more corruption in federal departments was exposed.[476] Among the most damaging scandal involved Secretary of War William W. Belknap, who took quarterly kickbacks from the Fort Sill tradership; he resigned in February 1876.[477] Belknap was impeached by the House but was acquitted by the Senate.[478] Grant's brother Orvil set up "silent partnerships" and received kickbacks from four trading posts.[479] Congress discovered that Secretary of Navy Robeson had been bribed by a naval contractor, but no articles of impeachment were drawn up.[480] In his December 5, 1876, Annual Message, Grant apologized to the nation: "Failures have been errors of judgement, not of intent."[481]
Election of 1876
The abandonment of Reconstruction played a central role during the 1876 election.[482] Mounting investigations into corruption by the House, controlled by the Democrats, discredited Grant's presidency.[483] Grant did not run for a third term, while the Republicans chose Governor Rutherford B. Hayes of Ohio, a reformer, at their convention.[484] The Democrats nominated Governor Samuel J. Tilden of New York. Voting irregularities in three Southern states caused the election to remain undecided for several months.[485][486]
Grant told Congress to settle the matter through legislation and assured both sides that he would not use the army to force a result, except to curb violence. On January 29, 1877, he signed legislation forming an Electoral Commission,[487] which ruled Hayes elected president; to forestall Democratic protests, Republicans agreed to the Compromise of 1877, in which the last troops were withdrawn from Southern capitals. With Reconstruction dead, 80 years of Jim Crow segregation was launched.[488] Grant's "calm visage" throughout the election crisis appeased the nation.[489]
Post-presidency (1877–1885)
After leaving the White House, Grant said he "was never so happy in my life". The Grants left Washington for New York, to attend the birth of their daughter Nellie's child. Calling themselves "waifs", the Grants toured Cincinnati, St. Louis, Chicago, and Galena, without a clear idea of where they would live.[490]
World tour and diplomacy
Using $25,000 (equivalent to $715,000 in 2023) from liquidating an investment in a Nevada-based mining company, the Grants set out on a world tour for approximately two and a half years.[491][492] On May 16, Grant and his wife left for England aboard the SS Indiana.[493] During the tour, the Grants made stops in Europe, Africa, India, the Middle East and the Far East, meeting with notable dignitaries such as Queen Victoria, Tsar Alexander II, Pope Leo XIII, Otto von Bismarck, Li Hongzhang, and Emperor Meiji.[494]
As a courtesy to Grant by the Hayes administration, his touring party received federal transportation on three U.S. Navy ships: a five-month tour of the Mediterranean on the USS Vandalia, travel from Hong Kong to China on the USS Ashuelot, and from China to Japan on the USS Richmond.[495] The Hayes administration encouraged Grant to assume a public unofficial diplomatic role and strengthen American interests abroad during the tour.[496] Homesick, the Grants left Japan on the SS City of Tokio and landed in San Francisco on September 20, 1879, greeted by cheering crowds.[497] Grant's tour demonstrated to Europe and Asia that the United States was an emerging world power.[498]
Third term attempt
Politically conservative,[499] Grant was supported by the Stalwarts who, led by Grant's old political ally Roscoe Conkling, saw Grant's renewed popularity as an opportunity, and sought to nominate him for the presidency in 1880. Opponents called it a violation of the unofficial two-term rule in use since George Washington. Grant said nothing publicly but wanted the job and encouraged his men.[500] Washburne urged him to run; Grant demurred. Even so, Conkling and John A. Logan began to organize delegates in Grant's favor. When the convention convened in Chicago in June, there were more delegates pledged to Grant than to any other candidate, but he was still short of a majority vote.[501]
At the convention, Conkling nominated Grant with an eloquent speech, the most famous line being "When asked which state he hails from, our sole reply shall be, he hails from Appomattox and its famous apple tree."[501] With 378 votes needed for the nomination, the first ballot had Grant at 304, Blaine at 284, Sherman at 93, and the rest to minor candidates.[502] After thirty-six ballots, Blaine's delegates combined with those of other candidates to nominate a compromise candidate: James A. Garfield.[503] A procedural motion made the vote unanimous for Garfield.[504] Grant gave speeches for Garfield but declined to criticize the Democratic nominee, Winfield Scott Hancock, a general who had served under him.[505] Garfield won the election. Grant gave Garfield his public support and pushed him to include Stalwarts in his administration.[506] On July 2, 1881, Garfield was shot by an assassin and died on September 19. On learning of Garfield's death from a reporter, Grant wept.[507]
Business failures
In the 19th century, there were no federal presidential pensions, and the Grants' personal income was $6,000 a year.[508] Grant's world tour had been costly, and he had depleted most of his savings.[509] Wealthy friends bought him a house on Manhattan's Upper East Side, and to make an income, Grant, Jay Gould, and former Mexican Finance Secretary Matías Romero chartered the Mexican Southern Railroad, with plans to build a railroad from Oaxaca to Mexico City. Grant urged President Chester A. Arthur to negotiate a free trade treaty with Mexico. Arthur and the Mexican government agreed, but the United States Senate rejected the treaty in 1883. The railroad was similarly unsuccessful, falling into bankruptcy the following year.[510]
At the same time, Grant's son Buck had opened a Wall Street brokerage house with Ferdinand Ward. A conniving man who swindled numerous wealthy men, Ward was at the time regarded as a rising star on Wall Street. The firm, Grant & Ward, was initially successful.[511] In 1883, Grant joined the firm and invested $100,000 (~$2.78 million in 2023) of his own money.[512] Ward paid investors abnormally high interest by pledging the company's securities on multiple loans in a process called rehypothecation (now regarded as a Ponzi scheme).[513] Ward, in collusion with banker James D. Fish and kept secret from bank examiners, retrieved the firm's securities from the company's bank vault.[514] When the trades went bad, multiple loans came due, all backed by the same collateral.[515]
Historians agree that the elder Grant was likely unaware of Ward's intentions, but it is unclear how much Buck Grant knew. In May 1884, enough investments went bad to convince Ward that the firm would soon be bankrupt. Ward, who assumed Grant was "a child in business matters",[516] told him of the impending failure, but assured Grant that this was a temporary shortfall.[517] Grant approached businessman William Henry Vanderbilt, who gave him a personal loan of $150,000.[518] Grant invested the money in the firm, but it was not enough to save it. The fall of Grant & Ward set off the Panic of 1884.[515]
Vanderbilt offered to forgive Grant's debt entirely, but Grant refused.[519] Impoverished but compelled by personal honor, he repaid what he could with his Civil War mementos and the sale or transfer of all other assets.[520] Vanderbilt took title to Grant's home, although he allowed the Grants to continue to reside there, and pledged to donate the souvenirs to the federal government and insisted the debt had been paid in full.[521] Grant was distraught over Ward's deception and asked privately how he could ever "trust any human being again."[522] In March 1885, he testified against both Ward and Fish.[523] After the collapse of Grant & Ward, there was an outpouring of sympathy for Grant.[524]
Memoirs, military pension, illness and death
Grant attended a service for Civil War veterans in Ocean Grove, New Jersey, on August 4, 1884, receiving a standing ovation from the ten thousand attendees; it would be his last public appearance.[525] In the summer of 1884, Grant complained of a sore throat but put off seeing a doctor until late October, when he learned it was cancer, possibly caused by his frequent cigar smoking.[526] Grant chose not to reveal the seriousness of his condition to his wife, who soon found out from Grant's doctor.[527] In March 1885, The New York Times announced that Grant was dying of cancer, causing nationwide public concern.[528][529] Knowing of Grant and Julia's financial difficulties, Congress restored him to the rank of General of the Army with full retirement pay—Grant's assumption of the presidency had required that he resign his commission and forfeit his (and his widow's) pension.[530]
Grant was nearly penniless and worried about leaving his wife money to live on. He approached The Century Magazine and wrote a number of articles on his Civil War campaigns for $500 (equivalent to $17,000 in 2023) each. The articles were well received by critics, and the editor, Robert Underwood Johnson, suggested that Grant write a memoir, as Sherman and others had done.[531] The magazine offered him a book contract with a 10% royalty. However, Grant's friend Mark Twain, one of the few who understood Grant's precarious financial condition, offered him an unheard-of 70% royalty.[515] To provide for his family, Grant worked intensely on his memoirs in New York City. His former staff member Adam Badeau assisted with the research, while his son Frederick located documents and did much of the fact-checking.[532] Because of the summer heat and humidity, his doctors recommended that he move upstate to a cottage at the top of Mount McGregor, offered by a family friend.[533]
On July 18, 1885, Grant finished his memoir,[534] which includes the events of his life to the end of the Civil War.[535] The Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant was a critical and commercial success. Julia Grant eventually received about $450,000 in royalties (equivalent to $15,300,000 in 2023). The memoir has been highly regarded by the public, military historians, and literary critics.[515] Grant portrayed himself as an honorable Western hero, whose strength lies in his honesty. He candidly depicted his battles against both the Confederates and internal army foes.[536]
Grant died in the Mount McGregor cottage on July 23, 1885.[537] Sheridan, then Commanding General of the Army, ordered a day-long tribute to Grant on all military posts, and President Grover Cleveland ordered a thirty-day nationwide period of mourning. After private services, the honor guard placed Grant's body on a funeral train, which traveled to West Point and New York City. A quarter of a million people viewed it in the two days before the funeral.[515] Tens of thousands of men, many of them veterans from the Grand Army of the Republic (GAR), marched with Grant's casket drawn by two dozen black stallions to Riverside Park in Morningside Heights, Manhattan.[538] His pallbearers included Union generals Sherman and Sheridan, Confederate generals Simon Bolivar Buckner and Joseph E. Johnston, Admiral David Dixon Porter, and Senator John A. Logan, the head of the GAR.[539] Following the casket in the seven-mile-long (11 km) procession were President Cleveland, two former living presidents Hayes and Arthur, all of the president's cabinet, and justices of the Supreme Court.[540]
Attendance at the New York funeral topped 1.5 million.[541] Ceremonies were held in other major cities around the country, while Grant was eulogized in the press.[542] Grant's body was laid to rest in Riverside Park, first in a temporary tomb, and then on April 17, 1897, in the General Grant National Memorial, known as "Grant's Tomb", the largest mausoleum in North America.[539]
Historical reputation
Grant was hailed across the North as the General who "saved the Union" and overall his military reputation has held up well. Achieving great national fame for his victories at Vicksburg and the surrender at Appomattox, Grant was the most successful general, Union or Confederate, in the American Civil War.[543] He was criticized by the South for using excessive force,[544] and his drinking was often exaggerated by the press and stereotyped by rivals and critics.[545] Historians also debate how effective Grant was at halting corruption.[546] The scandals during his administration stigmatized his political reputation.[547]
During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, Grant's reputation was damaged by the "Lost Cause" movement and the Dunning School.[548] Views of Grant reached new lows as he was seen as an unsuccessful president and an unskilled, if lucky, general.[549] In the 1950s, some historians reassessed Grant's military career, shifting the analysis of Grant as the victor by brute force to that of skillful modern strategist and commander.[550] Historian William S. McFeely's biography, Grant (1981), won the Pulitzer Prize, and brought renewed scholarly interest in Grant. McFeely believed Grant was an "ordinary American" trying to "make his mark" during the 19th century.[551] In the 21st century, Grant's reputation improved markedly among historians after the publication of Grant (2001), by historian Jean Edward Smith.[552][553] Opinions of Grant's presidency demonstrate a better appreciation of Grant's personal integrity, Reconstruction efforts, and peace policy towards Indians, even when they fell short.[554][555] H. W. Brands' The Man Who Saved the Union (2012), Ronald C. White's American Ulysses (2016), and Ron Chernow's Grant (2017) continued the elevation of Grant's reputation.[556] White said that Grant "demonstrated a distinctive sense of humility, moral courage, and determination", and as president he "stood up for African Americans, especially fighting against voter suppression perpetrated by the Ku Klux Klan".[557] White believed that Grant was "an exceptional person and leader".[558] Historian Robert Farley writes that the "Cult of Lee" and the Dunning School's resentment of Grant for his defeat of Lee and his strong enforcement of Reconstruction resulted in Grant's shoddy treatment by historians.[559]
In a 2021 C-SPAN survey ranking presidents from worst to best, Grant was ranked 20 out of 44 presidents, up from his previous ranking of 33 in 2017. This was due to the rehabilitation of his image and legacy in recent years, with Grant now receiving "more credit for Reconstruction and his diplomacy than condemnation for his alleged corruption."[560]
Dates of rank
| Insignia | Rank | Date | Component |
|---|---|---|---|
| No insignia | Cadet, USMA | July 1, 1839 | Regular Army |
 |
Brevet Second Lieutenant | July 1, 1843 | Regular Army |
| |
Second Lieutenant | September 30, 1845 | Regular Army |
 |
Brevet First Lieutenant | September 8, 1847 | Regular Army |
| |
First Lieutenant | September 16, 1847 | Regular Army |
 |
Captain | August 5, 1853 | Regular Army (resigned July 31, 1854) |
 |
Colonel | June 17, 1861 | Volunteers |
.svg){kind=small} |
Brigadier General | August 7, 1861 | Volunteers (to rank from May 17, 1861) |
.svg){kind=small} |
Major General | February 16, 1862 | Volunteers |
| |
Major General | July 4, 1863 | Regular Army |
.svg){kind=small} |
Lieutenant General | March 4, 1864 | Regular Army |
.svg){kind=small} |
General of the Army | July 25, 1866 | Regular Army |
| No insignia | General of the Armies | April 19, 2024 (posthumous) | Regular Army |
| Sources:[561][562] | |||
See also
Notes
- ^ Pronounced /ˈhaɪrəm juːˈlɪsiːz/ HY-rəm yoo-LISS-eez
- ^ One source states Hamer took the "S" from Simpson, Grant's mother's maiden name.[15] According to Grant, the "S." did not stand for anything. Upon graduation from the academy he adopted the name "Ulysses S. Grant".[16] Another version of the story states that Grant inverted his first and middle names to register at West Point as "Ulysses Hiram Grant" as he thought reporting to the academy with a trunk that carried the initials H.U.G. would subject him to teasing and ridicule. Upon finding that Hamer had nominated him as "Ulysses S. Grant." Grant decided to keep the name so that he could avoid the "hug" monogram; and it was easier to keep the wrong name than to try changing school records.[17]
- ^ At the time, class ranking largely determined branch assignments. Those at the top of the class were usually assigned to the Engineers, followed by Artillery, Cavalry, and Infantry.[28]
- ^ Several scholars, including Jean Edward Smith and Ron Chernow, state that Longstreet was Grant's best man and the two other officers were Grant's groomsmen.[33] All three went on to serve in the Confederate Army and surrendered to Grant at Appomattox.[34]
- ^ William McFeely said that Grant left the army simply because he was "profoundly depressed" and that the evidence as to how much and how often Grant drank remains elusive.[65] Jean Edward Smith maintains Grant's resignation was too sudden to be a calculated decision.[66] Buchanan never mentioned it again until asked about it during the Civil War.[67] The effects and extent of Grant's drinking on his military and public career are debated by historians.[68] Lyle Dorsett said Grant was an "alcoholic" but functioned amazingly well. William Farina maintains Grant's devotion to family kept him from drinking to excess and sinking into debt.[69]
- ^ The April 6th fighting had been costly, with thousands of casualties. That evening, heavy rain set in. Sherman found Grant standing alone under a tree in the rain. "Well, Grant, we've had the devil's own day of it, haven't we?" Sherman said. "Yes," replied Grant. "Lick 'em tomorrow, though."[121]
- ^ Smuggling of cotton was rampant, while the price of cotton skyrocketed.[152] Grant believed the smuggling funded the Confederacy and provided them with military intelligence.[153]
- ^ In 2012, historian Jonathan D. Sarna said: "Gen. Ulysses S. Grant issued the most notorious anti-Jewish official order in American history."[157] Grant made amends with the Jewish community during his presidency, appointing them to various federal positions.[158] In 2017, biographer Ron Chernow said of Grant: "As we shall see, Grant as president atoned for his action in a multitude of meaningful ways. He was never a bigoted, hate-filled man and was haunted by his terrible action for the rest of his days."[159]
- ^ Attending Lincoln's funeral on April 19, Grant stood alone and wept openly; he later said Lincoln was "the greatest man I have ever known".[234]
- ^ Southern Reconstructed states were controlled locally by Republican carpetbaggers, scalawags and former slaves. By 1877, the conservative Democrats had full control of the region and Reconstruction was dead.[299]
- ^ To placate the South in 1870, Grant signed the Amnesty Act, which restored political rights to former Confederates.[308]
- ^ Additionally, Grant's Postmaster General, John Creswell used his patronage powers to integrate the postal system and appointed a record number of African-American men and women as postal workers across the nation, while also expanding many of the mail routes.[310][311] Grant appointed Republican abolitionist and champion of black education Hugh Lennox Bond as U.S. Circuit Court judge.[312]
- ^ An 1870 Congressional investigation chaired by James A. Garfield cleared Grant of profiteering, but excoriated Gould and Fisk for their manipulation of the gold market and Corbin for exploiting his personal connection to Grant.[340]
- ^ Urged by his Secretary of War Rawlins, Grant initially supported recognition of Cuban belligerency, but Rawlins's death on September 6, 1869, removed any cabinet support for military intervention.[326]
- ^ Details revealed of the 1867 Crédit Mobilier bribery scandal, implicating both Colfax and Wilson, stung the Grant administration, but Grant was not connected to the corruption.[412]
- ^ The day after his inauguration, Grant wrote a letter to Colfax expressing his faith and trust in Colfax's integrity and allowed him to publish the letter, but the effort only served to compromise Grant's reputation.[425]
- ^ When Congress failed to make the Commission's reform rules permanent, Grant dissolved the Commission in 1874.[448]
References
- ^ Utter 2015, p. 141.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 636.
- ^ Hesseltine 1957, p. 4.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 5–6; White 2016, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Simpson 2014, pp. 2–3; White 2016, pp. 9–10.
- ^ Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 497; White 2016, pp. 16, 18.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 8, 10, 140–141; White 2016, p. 21.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 8; White 2016, p. 19.
- ^ Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7; Waugh 2009, p. 14.
- ^ Simpson 2014, pp. 2–3; Longacre 2006, pp. 6–7.
- ^ Waugh 2009, p. 14.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 99–100.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Simon 1967, p. 4.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 12; Smith 2001, pp. 24, 83; Simon 1967, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Garland 1898, pp. 30–31.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 12; Smith 2001, pp. 24, 83; Simon 1967, pp. 3–4; Kahan 2018, p. 2.
- ^ White 2016, p. 30.
- ^ Simpson 2014, p. 13–14; Smith 2001, pp. 26–28.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 10.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 27; McFeely 1981, pp. 16–17.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 16–17; Smith 2001, pp. 26–27.
- ^ White 2016, p. 41.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 12–13.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 27; Longacre 2006, p. 21; Cullum 1850, pp. 256–257.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 28; McFeely 1981, pp. 16, 19.
- ^ Jones 2011, p. 1580.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 28–29; Brands 2012a, p. 15; Chernow 2017, p. 81.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 28–29.
- ^ a b Smith 2001, pp. 30–33.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 61–62; White 2016, p. 102; Waugh 2009, p. 33.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 62; Smith 2001, p. 73; Flood 2005, p. 2007.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 62.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 73–74; Waugh 2009, p. 33; Chernow 2017, p. 62; White 2016, p. 102.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 73.
- ^ Simpson 2014, p. 49.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 35–37; Brands 2012a, pp. 15–17.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 30–31; Brands 2012a, p. 23.
- ^ a b White 2016, p. 80.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 33–34; Brands 2012a, p. 37.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 34–35.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 41–42.
- ^ a b McFeely 1981, p. 36.
- ^ White 2016, p. 66; Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
- ^ Simpson 2014, p. 44; Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 67–68, 70, 73; Brands 2012a, pp. 49–52.
- ^ White 2016, p. 75.
- ^ Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War 2013, p. 271.
- ^ Simpson 2014, p. 458; Chernow 2017, p. 58.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 30–31, 37–38.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 85, 96; Chernow 2017, p. 46.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 65.
- ^ a b Smith 2001, p. 76–78; Chernow 2017, pp. 73–74.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 74.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 78; Chernow 2017, p. 75.
- ^ McFeely 1981; Chernow 2017.
- ^ White 2016, p. 487; Chernow 2017, p. 78.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 52; Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, p. 81.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 81–83.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 55; Chernow 2017, pp. 84–85.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 85.
- ^ Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, pp. 84–85.
- ^ Cullum 1891, p. 171; Chernow 2017, pp. 85–86.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 55.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 87.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 88.
- ^ Farina 2007, p. 202.
- ^ Farina 2007, pp. 13, 202; Dorsett 1983.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 86–87; White 2016, pp. 118–120; McFeely 1981, p. 55.
- ^ Longacre 2006, pp. 55–58.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 87–88; Lewis 1950, pp. 328–332.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 77–78.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 95, 106; Simon 2002, p. 242; McFeely 1981, p. 60–61; Brands 2012a, pp. 94–96.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 58–60; White 2016, p. 125.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 61.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 58–60; Chernow 2017, p. 94.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 96.
- ^ White 2016, p. 128.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 62; Brands 2012a, p. 86; White 2016, p. 128.
- ^ Brands 2012a; White 2016.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 94–95; White 2016, p. 130.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 86–87.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 94–95; McFeely 1981, p. 69; White 2016, p. 130.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 64; Brands 2012a, pp. 89–90; White 2016, pp. 129–131.
- ^ White 2016, p. 131; Simon 1969, pp. 4–5.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 65–66; White 2016, pp. 133, 136.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 135–37.
- ^ White 2016, p. 140.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 121.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 99.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 140–43; Brands 2012a, pp. 121–22; McFeely 1981, p. 73; Bonekemper 2012, p. 17; Smith 2001, p. 99; Chernow 2017, p. 125.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 123.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 122–123; McFeely 1981, p. 80; Bonekemper 2012.
- ^ "Battle Unit Details - the Civil War". U.S. National Park Service.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 45–46; Smith 2001, p. 113; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 18–20.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 117–18; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
- ^ White 2016, p. 159; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 63; White 2016, p. 159; Bonekemper 2012, p. 21.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 91; Chernow 2017, pp. 153–155.
- ^ a b White 2016, p. 168.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 169–171.
- ^ White 2016, p. 172.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 172–173; Groom 2012, pp. 94, 101–103.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 92–94.
- ^ White 2016, p. 168; McFeely 1981, p. 94.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 138–142; Groom 2012, pp. 101–103.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 146.
- ^ Axelrod 2011, p. 210.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 141–164; Brands 2012a, pp. 164–165.
- ^ Groom 2012, pp. 138, 143–144.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 164–165; Smith 2001, pp. 125–134.
- ^ White 2016, p. 210; Barney 2011, p. 287.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 111–112; Groom 2012, p. 63; White 2016, p. 211.
- ^ Groom 2012, pp. 62–65; McFeely 1981, p. 112.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 111; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 94; Barney 2011, p. 287.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 217–218.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 58–59, 63–64.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 114; Flood 2005, pp. 109, 112; Bonekemper 2012, pp. 51, 58–59, 63–64.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 205.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, pp. 59, 63–64; Smith 2001, p. 206.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 115–16.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 115.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 187–88.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, p. 94; White 2016, p. 221.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 223–224.
- ^ Kaplan 2015, pp. 1109–1119; White 2016, pp. 223–225.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 188–191; White 2016, pp. 230–231.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 225–226.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 204; Barney 2011, p. 289.
- ^ White 2016, p. 229.
- ^ White 2016, p. 230; Groom 2012, pp. 363–364.
- ^ Longacre 2006, p. 137; White 2016, p. 231.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 211–212.
- ^ Badeau 1887, p. 126.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 133.
- ^ White 2016, p. 243; Miller 2019, p. xii; Chernow 2017, p. 236.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 221–223; Catton 2005, p. 112; Chernow 2017, pp. 236–237.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 147–148; White 2016, p. 246; Chernow 2017, pp. 238–239.
- ^ White 2016, p. 248; Chernow 2017, pp. 231–232.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 239.
- ^ Catton 2005, pp. 119, 291; White 2016, pp. 248–249; Chernow 2017, pp. 239–241.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, pp. 147–148.
- ^ Miller 2019, p. 248.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 244.
- ^ Miller 2019, pp. 206–207.
- ^ Miller 2019, pp. 206–209.
- ^ Miller 2019, pp. 209–210.
- ^ White 2016; Miller 2019, p. 154–155.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 225; White 2016, pp. 235–36.
- ^ a b Chernow 2017, p. 232.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 143–144, 151; Sarna 2012a, p. 37; White 2016, pp. 235–236.
- ^ Miller 2019, p. 259.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 232–33; Howland 1868, pp. 123–24.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 218; Shevitz 2005, p. 256.
- ^ Sarna 2012b.
- ^ Sarna 2012a, pp. 89, 147; White 2016, p. 494; Chernow 2017, p. 236.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 236.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 226–227.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, pp. 148–149.
- ^ White 2016, p. 269.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 226–228.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 160.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 164–165.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 231.
- ^ a b McFeely 1981, p. 136.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 122–138; Smith 2001, pp. 206–257.
- ^ Catton 1968, p. 8.
- ^ Catton 1968, p. 7.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 265; Cullum 1891, p. 172; White 2016, p. 295.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 196.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 145–147; Smith 2001, pp. 267–268; Brands 2012a, pp. 267–268.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 214–215.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 216.
- ^ Flood 2005, pp. 217–218.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 148–150.
- ^ Flood 2005, p. 232; McFeely 1981, p. 148; Cullum 1891, p. 172.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 313, 319.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 339, 342.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 343–44, 352.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 156; Chernow 2017, p. 352.
- ^ Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Simon 2002, p. 243; Chernow 2017, pp. 356–357.
- ^ Catton 2005, pp. 190, 193; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, pp. 348, 356–357.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 157; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, p. 356–357.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 157–175; Smith 2001, pp. 313–339, 343–368; Wheelan 2014, p. 20; Chernow 2017, pp. 356–57.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 355.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 378.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 396–97.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 303, 314; Chernow 2017, pp. 376–77.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 314; Chernow 2017, pp. 376–77.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 378–79, 384; Bonekemper 2012, p. 463.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 165.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 385–87, 394–95; Bonekemper 2012, p. 463.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 389, 392–95.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 169.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 403–04; Bonekemper 2011.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 170–171; Furgurson 2007, p. 235; Chernow 2017, p. 403.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 403.
- ^ Furgurson 2007, pp. 120–21.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 403–04.
- ^ Bonekemper 2011, pp. 41–42.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 406–07.
- ^ Bonekemper 2010, p. 182; Chernow 2017, p. 407.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 157–175; Smith 2001, pp. 313–339, 343–368.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 178–186.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 414; White 2016, pp. 369–370.
- ^ a b Catton 1968, p. 309.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 429.
- ^ Catton 1968, p. 324.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 398.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 179; Smith 2001, pp. 369–395; Catton 1968, pp. 308–309.
- ^ Catton 1968, p. 325.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 430.
- ^ Catton 2005, pp. 223, 228; Smith 2001, p. 387.
- ^ Catton 2005, p. 235; Smith 2001, pp. 388–389.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 388–389.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 389–390.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 390.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, p. 359.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, p. 353.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, pp. 365–366.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 403–404.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 401–403.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 504; Smith 2001, pp. 401–03.
- ^ White 2016, p. 405.
- ^ Smith 2001.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 405–406.
- ^ Goethals 2015, p. 92; Smith 2001, p. 405.
- ^ White 2016, p. 407.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 212, 219–220; Catton 2005, p. 304; Chernow 2017, p. 510.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 224; White 2016, p. 412.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 375–376.
- ^ a b Smith 2001, pp. 409–412.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 227–229; White 2016, p. 414.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 410–411; Chernow 2017, pp. 556–557.
- ^ White 2016, p. 418.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 417–418.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 232–233.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 434n.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 10.
- ^ Simpson 1988, pp. 433–434.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 420; McFeely 1981, pp. 238–241.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 390.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 565–566.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 240–241; Smith 2001, pp. 420–421; Chernow 2017, pp. 565–566; Simpson 1988, p. 439.
- ^ a b Chernow 2017, pp. 533–534.
- ^ a b Chernow 2017, p. 569.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 396; Simon 2002, p. 244.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 397–398.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 432–433; Simon 2002, p. 244.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 438; Simon 2002, p. 244.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, pp. 594–95.
- ^ White 2016, p. 453.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 603.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 35–36.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 454–455; Simon 2002, pp. 244.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, p. 611.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 458–59; Simon 2002, p. 244.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 244.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 244; Chernow 2017, p. 614.
- ^ Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John T. (2018a). "Republican Party Platform of 1868". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- ^ Peters, Gerhard; Woolley, John T. (2018b). "Democratic Party Platform of 1868". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 244–45.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 46.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 264–267.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 459–460.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 468–469.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 461.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 245.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 55.
- ^ Foner 2014, pp. 243–44.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 284; Smith 2001, p. 461; White 2016, p. 471.
- ^ White 2016, p. 472.
- ^ Patrick 1968, p. 166; McFeely 1981, p. 305; Simon 2002, pp. 246, 250.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 465–466; White 2016, pp. 475, 530; Chernow 2017, pp. 635–636; Simon 2002, p. 246.
- ^ a b c Simon 2002, pp. 246–47.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 507, 564; Simon 2002, pp. 246–247.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 45.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 48.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 628; Simon 2002, pp. 246–247; Kahan 2018, p. 48.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 446, 469–470; Kahan 2018, pp. 47–48.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 474–75.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 472; White 2016, pp. 474–475.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 376.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 749–50; Kahan 2018, p. xii; Calhoun 2017, pp. 384–85.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 76; Chernow 2017, pp. 643–44; Sarna 2012a, pp. ix–xiv.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 512.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 512–513; Smith 2001, p. 570.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 513.
- ^ The New York Times 1871; Ertman 2010; Kahan 2018, p. 301.
- ^ a b c Kahan 2018, p. 132.
- ^ Carpenter 2001, pp. 84–85.
- ^ a b Kahan 2018, p. 61.
- ^ Scher 2015, p. 83; Simon 2002, p. 247.
- ^ Simon 2002.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 435, 465; Chernow 2017, pp. 686–87; Simon 2002, p. 247.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 465.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 247–48.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 246.
- ^ Black-American Members by Congress, 1870–Present Access Date November 10, 2021
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 543–45; Brands 2012a, p. 474.
- ^ Kahan 2018, pp. 64–65; Calhoun 2017, pp. 317–319.
- ^ Foner 2019, pp. 119–21.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 248.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 66.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 547; Calhoun 2017, p. 324.
- ^ Kahan 2018, pp. 67–68.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 547–48.
- ^ Osborne, John M.; Bombaro, Christine (2015). "Forgotten Abolitionist: John A. J. Creswell of Maryland" (PDF). Dickinson College. Archived from the original on January 18, 2017. Retrieved January 21, 2017.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 629.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 628.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 122.
- ^ Richter 2012, pp. 72, 527–528, 532; Kahan 2018, pp. 121–122.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 552–53; Kahan 2018, pp. 121–22.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 538–41; Foner 2014, p. 528.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 553.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 420–22.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 816–17.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 552.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 418–19.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 418–19; Franklin 1974, p. 235.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 570.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 603–04; Sproat 1974, pp. 163–65; Calhoun 2017, pp. 561–62.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 853–54; Smith 2001, pp. 603–04; Sproat 1974, pp. 163–65.
- ^ a b c d Simon 2002, p. 249.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 279.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 476–78; Simon 2002, p. 248; Burdekin & Siklos 2013, pp. 24–25.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 248; Chernow 2017, p. 672; Calhoun 2017, p. 125; Kahan 2018, p. 54.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 125–28; Kahan 2018, p. 54.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 128.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 437–443; McFeely 1974, p. 134; Chernow 2017, p. 673; Calhoun 2017, pp. 128–129; Kahan 2018, p. 55.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 136, 323–324; Chernow 2017, p. 674; Kahan 2018, pp. 55–56.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 130.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 131.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 437–43; Simon 2002, p. 248; Calhoun 2017, p. 130.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 140–141.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 141.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 445, 636; Chernow 2017, pp. 677–88; Calhoun 2017, p. 141.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 445–46; Simon 2002, p. 248.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 328; Smith 2001, p. 490.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 310–311, 380–381.
- ^ Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76.
- ^ Grant, Ulysses Simpson (2000). The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant: 1873. SIU Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-8093-2277-0.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 76.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 249; Smith 2001, p. 491; Kahan 2018, p. 78.
- ^ Libby, Justin (1994). "Hamilton Fish and the Origins of Anglo-American Solidarity". Mid-America. 76 (3): 205–226.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 352–354.
- ^ John W. Dwinelle (1870). American Opinions on the "Alabama," and other political questions. pp. 37–39.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 508–511.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 512–15; Simon 2002, p. 249.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 249; Simon 2002, pp. 512–15; Calhoun 2017, p. 344.
- ^ a b Calhoun 2017, p. 7.
- ^ Wallace, W. Stewart. "Treaty of Washington, 1871". Marianopolis College.
- ^ a b Roblin, Sebastien (January 1, 2018). "In 1871, America 'Invaded' Korea. Here's What Happened". The National Interest. Archived from the original on November 9, 2020. Retrieved April 14, 2021.
- ^ a b Kahan 2018, p. 139.
- ^ Lindsay, James M. (June 10, 2013). "TWE Remembers: The Korean Expedition of 1871 and the Battle of Ganghwa (Shinmiyangyo)". Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved March 28, 2021.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 555, 660–61; Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76; Calhoun 2017, p. 199.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 661–62; Kahan 2018, pp. 75–76; Calhoun 2017, pp. 199–200, 206; Brands 2012a, pp. 454–55.
- ^ Kahan 2018, pp. 90–91; Calhoun 2017, p. 204.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 207, 210–11; Kahan 2018, p. 91.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 500–02; Chernow 2017, pp. 663–664; Calhoun 2017, p. 220.
- ^ a b Calhoun 2017, p. 224.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 91; Calhoun 2017, pp. 223, 226.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 665.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 660–665; Calhoun 2017, pp. 226–234, 254.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 237–238.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 509–12; Pletcher 1998, p. 167; Simon 2002; McFeely 1981, pp. 339–40.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 254, 258; Kahan 2018, p. 94.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 461; Kahan 2018, pp. 94–95.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 715–716.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 461; Smith 2001, pp. 505–506.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 250; McFeely 1981, pp. 349–352; Kahan 2018, p. 95.
- ^ Priest, Andrew (2014). "Thinking about Empire: The administration of Ulysses S. Grant, Spanish colonialism and the ten years' war in Cuba" (PDF). Journal of American Studies. 48 (2): 541–558. doi:10.1017/s0021875813001400. ISSN 0021-8758. S2CID 145139039.
- ^ a b Hamilton Fish (1808–1893).
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 426–31.
- ^ Nevins 1936, pp. 667–94.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 539–40.
- ^ Hendrix, Steve (April 25, 2018). "'Brilliant beyond all precedent': The first White House state dinner for the king of Hawaii". The Washington Post.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 539–540.
- ^ Farr, Kate. "Reciprocity Treaty of 1875". Dartmouth College. Archived from the original on October 21, 2023. Retrieved June 29, 2023.
- ^ White 2016, p. 487.
- ^ White 2016, p. 491.
- ^ a b Chernow 2017, pp. 830–31.
- ^ a b c "President Ulysses S. Grant and Federal Indian Policy". National Park Service. Ulysses S. Grant National Historic Site. Retrieved April 14, 2022.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 490–491; Simon 2002, p. 250; Smith 2001, pp. 472–473.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 250; Smith 2001, p. 535; Simon 2002, p. 250.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 308–309; Brands 2012a, p. 502.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 270.
- ^ Waltmann 1971, p. 327.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 250.
- ^ Coffey 2011; Kahan 2018, pp. 71–72.
- ^ Block, Kathy. Du Shane, Neal (ed.). "Skeleton Cave Massacre Site". American Pioneer & Cemetery Research Project.
- ^ a b Smith 2001, pp. 532–535; Coffey 2011.
- ^ Kahan 2018, p. 127.
- ^ Coffey 2011, pp. 604–605.
- ^ Taylor 2011, pp. 3187–3188; Pritchard 1999, p. 5.
- ^ "Timeline of U.S. Indian Massacres". AAANativeArts.com. February 29, 2016.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 830–831; Brands 2012a, p. 564.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 832; Calhoun 2017, p. 546.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 538.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 565–566; Donovan 2008, pp. 115, 322–323.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 549.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 316.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 541.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 250; Chernow 2017, pp. 734–735; Kahan 2018, pp. 105–106; Brands 2012a, pp. 488–489.
- ^ Kahan 2018, pp. 104–106.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 250–51; Brands 2012a, p. 495; Chernow 2017, pp. 740–741.
- ^ Wang 1997, pp. 103–104; Simon 2002, p. 250; Chernow 2017, pp. 735, 740.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 495.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 361, 375.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 251; Chernow 2017, p. 753; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 743.
- ^ White 2016, p. 532.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 372–373, 387.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 749–750.
- ^ Foner 2014; Calhoun 2017.
- ^ White 2016, p. 535.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 384; Simon 2002, pp. 250–251; Chernow 2017, p. 749.
- ^ "Election of 1872". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 250–251; Brands 2012a, p. 499.
- ^ Foner 2014, p. 508.
- ^ Goethals 2015, p. 98.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 250–251.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 752–53.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 540–41.
- ^ White 2016, p. 545; Diller 1996, p. 1545.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 385.
- ^ Venable 2011, pp. 66–68.
- ^ Weinstein 1967, pp. 307–326.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 517.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 393.
- ^ a b Smith 2001, pp. 576–579.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 518.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 391; Smith 2001, pp. 375–377.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 779.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 395.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 580–581.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 545, 550.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 580–582; Brands 2012a, p. 554.
- ^ Woodward 1957, p. 156; White 2016, pp. 538, 541.
- ^ McFeely 1974, pp. 133–134; Chernow 2017, p. 825.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 587, 92; McFeely 1981, pp. 407–15; White 2016, pp. 538–39; Chernow 2017, p. 672; Kahan 2018, p. 119.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 730; Schmiel 2014, pp. 205, 213; Calhoun 2017, p. 293.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 730–731; Schmiel 2014, pp. 214–215; Calhoun 2017, pp. 284–286.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 589–90; Simon 2002, p. 250; Calhoun 2017, p. 372; Kahan 2018, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 731; Calhoun 2017, p. 372.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 589.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 366–367, 735–737; McFeely 1974, pp. 144–145; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
- ^ a b c d e f Martinez (March 15, 2021).
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 368–369; McFeely 1974, pp. 144–145; Kahan 2018, p. 114.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 369.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 251; Calhoun 2017, pp. 402–409.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 251; Smith 2001, pp. 552–553; Calhoun 2017, pp. 369, 404.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 446.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 578; McFeely 1974, p. 147; Chernow 2017, p. 782; Calhoun 2017, pp. 446–447.
- ^ McFeely 1974, pp. 147–48; Chernow 2017, p. 782; White 2016.
- ^ McFeely 1974, pp. 147–148; Chernow 2017, p. 782; Calhoun 2017, pp. 446–448.
- ^ McFeely 1974, pp. 133–134.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 556–557; Kohn 2000, p. 417; Nevins 1929, p. 56; McFeely 1974, p. 148; White 2016, pp. 557, 560; Calhoun 2017, p. 494.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 494, 496.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 252; Chernow 2017, p. 798.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, pp. 496–497.
- ^ McFeely 1974, p. 156; Smith 2001, p. 584; Brands 2012a, pp. 556–557; White 2016, p. 754; Calhoun 2017.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 498.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 499.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 252; White 2016, p. 562; Calhoun 2017, pp. 77–78.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 515.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 805–06; Calhoun 2017, pp. 518, 522–523.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 592–93; White 2016, p. 564; Simon 2002.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 592.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 591–593; Simon 2002, p. 252; Calhoun 2017, p. 527.
- ^ McFeely 1974, pp. 149–150.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 250; Patrick 1968, p. 172; White 2016, p. 560.
- ^ White 2016, p. 557; Chernow 2017, pp. 787–788.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 429; White 2016, p. 554.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 560–561; Donovan 2008, p. 104; Simon 2002, p. 252; Chernow 2017.
- ^ Simon 2002, p. 252.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 819–20.
- ^ McFeely 1974, p. 153.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 441–42.
- ^ Simon 2002, pp. 252–53.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 440–41; Patrick 1968, p. 255; Simon 2002, pp. 252–253.
- ^ Simon 2002; McFeely 1981, pp. 440–441; Smith 2001, pp. 586, 596.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 597–98.
- ^ "Election of 1876". The American Presidency Project. University of California, Santa Barbara.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 601–603.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 604; Chernow 2017, p. 858.
- ^ Smith 2001, pp. 603–604.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 862; White 2016, p. 587.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 448–449; White 2016, p. 587.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 387.
- ^ White 2016, p. 590.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 872.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 597–602, 608–10.
- ^ Campbell 2016, pp. xi–xii, 2–3.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 613; Chernow 2017, pp. 881–83.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 871.
- ^ Compromise and Political Action Political Morality in Liberal and Democratic Life By J. Patrick Dobel, 1990, P.11
- ^ Hesseltine 1957, pp. 432–439.
- ^ a b Brands 2012a, pp. 600–601.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 479–481.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 602.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 617.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 604–605.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 607–609.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 613–614.
- ^ Bunting 2004, p. 151.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 611.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 486–89.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 488–91; Ward 2012.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 619.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 488–91.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 627–29.
- ^ a b c d e King, Gilbert (January 16, 2013). "War and Peace of Mind for Ulysses S. Grant". Smithsonian.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 917.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 620–21; White 2016, pp. 627–629.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 492–93.
- ^ "General Grant's Example: He Declines Mr. Vanderbilt's Offer to Relieve Him from His Debt". New York Herald. May 22, 1884. p. 3G.
- ^ Perry 2004, p. xxix.
- ^ White 2016, pp. 632–33; Brands 2012a, pp. 620–21.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 621.
- ^ Badeau 1887, p. 447; Mackowski & White 2015, p. 169.
- ^ Chernow 2017, pp. 925–26.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 495–496.
- ^ White 2016, p. 636; Waugh 2009, p. 277.
- ^ White 2016, p. 637.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 622–662; Smith 2001, p. 625.
- ^ "TimesMachine: Sunday March 1, 1885 - NYTimes.com". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved October 14, 2024.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 625; White 2016, p. 641.
- ^ McFeely 1981.
- ^ Brands 2012a, p. 625.
- ^ White 2016, p. 646.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 629–630.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 627.
- ^ Russell 1990, pp. 189–209.
- ^ McFeely 1981, p. 517.
- ^ Chernow 2017, p. 955.
- ^ a b Brands 2012a, pp. 633–35.
- ^ Smith 2001, p. 19.
- ^ Brands 2012a, pp. 633–635.
- ^ Waugh 2009, pp. 215–259.
- ^ Bonekemper 2012, p. xiii.
- ^ Bonekemper 2011; White 2016, pp. 287–88.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 55, 77; Waugh 2009, pp. 39–40.
- ^ White 2016, p. 539.
- ^ Calhoun 2017, p. 592.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. 521–22; White 2016, p. xxiii; Calhoun 2017, p. 587.
- ^ Brands 2012b, p. 45.
- ^ Rafuse 2007, p. 851.
- ^ McFeely 1981, pp. xii, xiii, 522; White 2016, p. xxiv.
- ^ Swain, Susan (February 17, 2017). "C-SPAN Releases Third Historians Survey of Presidential Leadership". C-SPAN. Retrieved June 30, 2020.
The most-average U.S. president, as rated by our historian participants is Ulysses S. Grant, who ranks 22 out of 43 presidents.
- ^ "Ulysses S. Grant". C-SPAN. September 4, 2001. Retrieved June 30, 2020.
- ^ Waugh 2009, p. 2; Stiles 2016.
- ^ "Today's historians have a higher opinion of Ulysses S. Grant". The Economist. October 5, 2017.
- ^ Maslin, Janet (October 10, 2017). "In Ron Chernow's 'Grant,' an American Giant's Makeover Continues". The New York Times.
- ^ Hunt 2017.
- ^ White 2016, p. xxiv.
- ^ Farley 2021.
- ^ Brockell, Gillian (June 30, 2021). "Historians just ranked the presidents. Trump wasn't last". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on July 3, 2023. Retrieved July 3, 2023.
- ^ Historical Register and Dictionary of the United States Army. Francis B. Heitman. 1903. Vol. 1. p. 470.
- ^ Simpson, Brooks D. [@BrooksDSimpson] (October 11, 2024). "Someone got promoted!" (Tweet). Retrieved October 12, 2024 – via Twitter.
[with scanned attachment copy of April 19, 2024, U.S. Department of Defense] Memorandum for the Secretary of the Army; Subject: Posthumous Advancement on the Retired List; . . . General Ulysses S. Grant . . . to the grade of General of the Armies . . .
Bibliography
Biographical
- Badeau, Adam (1887). Grant in Peace: From Appomattox to Mount McGregor. S. S. Scranton & Company. ISBN 978-0-8369-5723-5.
- Bonekemper, Edward H. III (2010). Ulysses S. Grant: A Victor, Not a Butcher — The Military Genius of the Man Who Won the Civil War. Regnery Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5969-8641-1.
- Brands, H. W. (2012a). The Man Who Saved the Union: Ulysses S. Grant in War and Peace. Doubleday. ISBN 978-0-385-53241-9.
- —— (2012b). "Presidents in Crisis: Grant Takes on the Klan". American History: 42–47. ISSN 1076-8866.
- Bunting, Josiah III (2004). Ulysses S. Grant. Times Books. ISBN 978-0-8050-6949-5.
- Calhoun, Charles W. (2017). The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant. University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2484-3. scholarly review and response by Calhoun at doi:10.14296/RiH/2014/2270
- Campbell, Edwina S. (2016). Citizen of a Wider Commonwealth: Ulysses S. Grant's Postpresidential Diplomacy. Southern Illinois University Press. ISBN 978-0-8093-3478-0.
- Chernow, Ron (2017). Grant. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-487-6.
- Dorsett, Lyle W. (1983). "The Problem of Ulysses S. Grant's Drinking During the Civil War". Hayes Historical Journal. IV (2): 37–49.
- Furgurson, Ernest B. (2007) [2000]. Not War But Murder: Cold Harbor 1864. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. ISBN 978-0-3074-2704-5.
- Garland, Hamlin (1898). Ulysses S. Grant: His Life and Character. Doubleday & McClure. ISBN 978-0-7950-1911-1.
- Hesseltine, William B. (1957) [1935]. Ulysses S. Grant: Politician. F. Ungar Pub. Co. ISBN 978-1-931313-85-8.
- Howland, Edward (1868). Grant As a Soldier and Statesman: Being a Succinct History of His Military and Civil Career. J. B. Burr and Company.
- Kahan, Paul (2018). The Presidency of Ulysses S. Grant: Preserving the Civil War's Legacy. Westholme Publishing. ISBN 978-1-59416-273-2.
- Longacre, Edward G. (2006). General Ulysses S. Grant: The Soldier and the Man. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-81636-9. online free
- Mackowski, Chris; White, Kristopher D. (2015). Grant's Last Battle: The Story Behind the Personal Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant. Savas Beatie. ISBN 978-1-61121-160-3.
- McFeely, William S. (1974). "War Department and William W. Belknap". In Woodward, C. Vann (ed.). Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct. Dell Publishing. pp. 132–163. ISBN 978-0-440-05923-3.
- —— (1981). Grant: A Biography. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-01372-6.
- Nevins, Allan (1929). Dictionary of American Biography Bristow, Benjamin Helm. Charles Scribner's Sons. pp. 55–56.
- Patrick, Rembert W. (1968). The Reconstruction of the Nation. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-501016-9.
- Perry, Mark (2004). Grant and Twain: The Story of a Friendship That Changed America. Random House. ISBN 978-0-679-64273-2.
- Pletcher, David M. (1998). The Diplomacy of Trade and Investment: American Economic Expansion in the Hemisphere, 1865–1900. University of Missouri Press. ISBN 978-0-8262-1127-9.
- Pritchard, James A. (1999). Preserving Yellowstone's Natural Conditions: Science and the Perception of Nature. University of Nebraska Press. ISBN 978-0-8032-3722-3.
- Richter, William L. (2012). Historical Dictionary of the Civil War and Reconstruction (2nd ed.). The Scarecrow Press, Inc. ISBN 978-0-8108-7817-4.
- Schmiel, Eugene D. (2014). Citizen-General: Jacob Dolson Cox and the Civil War Era. Ohio University Press. ISBN 978-0-8214-2082-9.
- Shevitz, Amy Hill (2005). "General Orders No. 11 (1862)". In Levy, Richard S. (ed.). Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia of Prejudice and Persecution. Vol. I. ABC-Clio. p. 256. ISBN 9781851094394.
- Simon, John Y. (1967). Simon, John Y. (ed.). "The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant, Volume 01: 1837–1861". Volumes of the Papers of Ulysses S. Grant. Southern Illinois University Press.
- —— (1969). "The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant, Volume 02: April–September 1861". Volumes of the Papers of Ulysses S. Grant. Southern Illinois University Press.
- Simon, John Y. (2002). "Ulysses S. Grant". In Graff, Henry (ed.). The Presidents: A Reference History (7th ed.). Scribner. pp. 245–260. ISBN 978-0-684-80551-1.
- Simpson, Brooks D. (2014) [2000]. Ulysses S. Grant: Triumph Over Adversity, 1822–1865. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 978-0-395-65994-6.
- Tucker, Spencer C., ed. (2013). The Encyclopedia of the Mexican-American War: A Political, Social, and Military History. Vol. I. ABC-Clio. ISBN 978-1-85109-853-8.
- Smith, Jean Edward (2001). Grant. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-84927-0.
- Sproat, John G. (1974). Woodward, C. Vann (ed.). Responses of the Presidents to Charges of Misconduct. Delacorte Press. pp. 163–176. ISBN 978-0-440-05923-3.
- Taylor, M. Scott (2011). "Buffalo Hunt: International Trade and the Virtual Extinction of the North American Bison" (PDF). The American Economic Review. 101 (7): 3162–3195. doi:10.1257/aer.101.7.3162. JSTOR 41408734. S2CID 154413490.
- Waltmann, Henry G. (1971). "Circumstantial Reformer: President Grant & the Indian Problem". Arizona and the West. 13 (4): 323–342. JSTOR 40168089.
- Wang, Xi (1997). The Trial of Democracy: Black Suffrage and Northern Republicans, 1860–1910. University of Georgia Press. ISBN 978-0-8203-4206-1.
- Ward, Geoffrey C. (2012). A Disposition to Be Rich: How a Small-Town Pastor's Son Ruined an American President, Brought on a Wall Street Crash, and Made Himself the Best-Hated Man in the United States. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-679-44530-2.
- Waugh, Joan (2009). U. S. Grant: American Hero, American Myth. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-3317-9.
- Weinstein, Allen (1967). "Was There a 'Crime of 1873'?: The Case of the Demonetized Dollar". Journal of American History. 54 (2): 307–326. doi:10.2307/1894808. JSTOR 1894808.
- White, Ronald C. (2016). American Ulysses: A Life of Ulysses S. Grant. Random House Publishing Group. ISBN 978-1-58836-992-5.
- Woodward, C. Vann (1957). "The Lowest Ebb". American Heritage. 8 (3): 53–108. ISSN 0002-8738.
Military and politics
- Axelrod, Alan (2011). Generals South Generals North The Commanders of the Civil War Reconsidered (ebook). Lyons Press. ISBN 978-0-7627-8849-1.
- Barney, William L. (2011). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Civil War. Oxford University Press, Inc. ISBN 978-0-19-978201-7.
- Burdekin, Richard C.K.; Siklos, Pierre L. (2013). "Gold Resumption and the Deflation of the 1870s". In Randall E. Parker; Robert M. Whaples (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Major Events in Economic History. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203067871. ISBN 978-0-415-67703-5. SSRN 2030878.
- Bonekemper, Edward H. III (2012). Grant and Lee: Victorious American and Vanquished Virginian. Regnery History. ISBN 978-1-62157-010-3.
- Carpenter, Daniel P. (2001). "Chapter Three". The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton University Press. pp. 84–85. ISBN 978-0-691-07009-4. OCLC 47120319. Retrieved April 1, 2010.
- Catton, Bruce (1968). Grant Takes Command. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0316132107.
- —— (2005) [1960]. The Civil War. American Heritage. ISBN 978-0-618-00187-3.
- Coffey, David (2011). Spencer C. Tucker (ed.). The Encyclopedia of North American Indian Wars, 1607–1890: A Political, Social, and Military History. Vol. 1. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-697-8.
- Cullum, George W. (1850). "Biographical Register of the Officers and Graduates of the U.S. Military Academy". Houghton Mifflin And Company.
- Cullum, George W. (1891). Biographical Register of the Officers and Graduates of the U.S. Military Academy. Vol. 2. Houghton Mifflin And Company. ISBN 978-0-608-42862-8.
- Donovan, James (2008). A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Bighorn – The Last Great Battle of the American West. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-06747-8.
- Ertman, M. M. (2010). "Race Treason: The Untold Story of America's Ban on Polygamy". Columbia Journal of Gender and Law. 19 (2): 287–366.
- Farina, William (2007). Ulysses S. Grant, 1861–1864: His Rise from Obscurity to Military Greatness. McFarland & Co. ISBN 978-0-7864-2977-6.
- Flood, Charles Bracelen (2005). Grant and Sherman: The Friendship That Won the Civil War. Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-06-114871-2.
- Foner, Eric (2014). Reconstruction: America's Unfinished Revolution 1863–1877 Updated Version. Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0062354518.
- —— (2019). The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc. ISBN 978-0393358520.
- Franklin, John Hope (1974). The Enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1875. Prologue.
- Goethals, George R. (2015). Presidential Leadership and African Americans. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-81424-0.
- Groom, Winston (2012). Shiloh 1862. National Geographic Society. ISBN 978-1-4262-0879-9.
- Lewis, Lloyd (1950). Captain Sam Grant. Little, Brown. ISBN 978-0-316-52348-6.
- Kohn, George C. (2000). The New Encyclopedia of American Scandal. Facts on File, Inc. ISBN 978-0-8160-4420-7.
- Miller, Donald L. (2019). Vicksburg: Grant's Campaign That Broke the Confederacy. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4516-4137-0.
- "The Mormon Trials" (PDF). The New York Times. November 22, 1871 – via TimesMachine.
- Nevins, Allan (1936). Hamilton Fish: The Inner History of the Grant Administration. Vol. 2. Dodd, Mead. ASIN B00085BDXU.
- Sarna, Jonathan D. (2012a). When General Grant Expelled the Jews. Schocken Books. ISBN 978-0-8052-4279-9.
- —— (March 13, 2012b). "When Gen. Grant Expelled the Jews". Slate.
- Scher, Richard K. (2015) [1997]. Politics in the New South: Republicanism, Race and Leadership in the Twentieth Century. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-56324-848-1.
- Simpson, Brooks D. (1988). "Grant's Tour of the South Revisited". The Journal of Southern History. 54 (3). JSTOR: 425–448. doi:10.2307/2208997. JSTOR 2208997. Retrieved August 16, 2020.
- Utter, Glenn H. (2015). Guns and Contemporary Society: The Past, Present, and Future of Firearms and Firearm Policy. ABC-Clio. ISBN 978-1-4408-3218-5.
- Venable, Shannon (2011). Gold: A Cultural Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-313-38430-1.
- Wheelan, Joseph (2014). Bloody Spring: Forty Days that Sealed the Confederacy's Fate. Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-82206-3.
Historiography
- Bonekemper, Edward H. III (April 2011). "The Butcher's Bill: Ulysses S. Grant Is Often Referred to as a 'Butcher,' But Does Robert E. Lee Actually Deserve That Title?". Civil War Times. 52 (1): 36–43. OCLC 67618265.
- Diller, Daniel C. (1996). Michael Nelson (ed.). Guide to the Presidency. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-56802-018-1.
- Hunt, Linda Lawrence (July 27, 2017). "'American Ulysses' writer Ronald C. White explains why Grant is so often misunderstood". The Christian Science Monitor.
- Jones, Terry L. (2011). Historical Dictionary of the Civil War. Vol. 1. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-8108-7953-9.
- Kaplan, Mike (October 2015). "Grant's Drinking or... The Beast That Will Not Die". Journal of Military History. 79 (4): 1109–1119.
- Price, Kay; Hendricks, Marian (2007). Galena. Arcadia Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7385-5114-2.
- Rafuse, Ethan S. (July 2007). "Still a Mystery? General Grant and the Historians, 1981–2006". Journal of Military History. 71 (3): 849–874. doi:10.1353/jmh.2007.0230. S2CID 159901226.
- Russell, Henry M. W. (Spring 1990). "The Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant: The Rhetoric of Judgment". Virginia Quarterly Review. 66 (2): 189–209. ISSN 0042-675X.
- Stiles, T.J. (October 19, 2016). "Ulysses S. Grant: New Biography of 'A Nobody From Nowhere'". The New York Times.
- "General Ulysses S. Grant Memorial, (sculpture)". Collections Search Center. Smithsonian Institution. 2014.
- Farley, Robert (September 20, 2021). "Why too many historians look down on Ulysses S. Grant". Business Insider. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
- "Biographies of the Secretaries of State: Hamilton Fish (1808–1893)". Department of State. Retrieved February 18, 2022.
- Martinez, J. Michael (March 15, 2021). "Scoundrels: Political Scandals in American History—Scandals of the 1870s". Retrieved February 27, 2022.
Further reading
Articles
- Bell, Robert A. (2018). "The Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868 and the Sioux: Is the United States Honoring the Agreements it Made?". Indigenous Policy Journal. XXVIII (3).
- Ferraro, William M. (January 2019). "Old and New Views of Ulysses S. Grant: The Soldier and The Man". Journal of Military History. 83 (1): 195–212.
- Foner, Eric (March 28, 2015). "Why Reconstruction Matters". The New York Times.
- —— (July 23, 2015). "Ulysses S. Grant Died 130 Years Ago. Racists Hate Him, But Historians No Longer Do". The Huffington Post.
- Kaczorowski, Robert J. (1995). "Federal Enforcement of Civil Rights During the First Reconstruction". Fordham Urban Law Journal. 23 (1): 155–186. ISSN 2163-5978.
- King, Gilbert (January 16, 2013). "War and Peace of Mind for Ulysses S. Grant". Smithsonian.
- Roza, Matthew (December 24, 2022). "The true story of the president who couldn't hear music". Salon.
- Simon, John Y. (1965). "From Galena to Appomattox: Grant and Washburne". Journal of the Illinois State Historical Society. 58 (2): 165–189. JSTOR i40006018.
- Solly, Meilan (March 31, 2023). "When President Ulysses S. Grant Was Arrested for Speeding in a Horse-Drawn Carriage". Smithsonian.
- Stockwell, Mary (January 9, 2019). "Ulysses Grant's Failed Attempt to Grant Native Americans Citizenship". Smithsonian.
- Waugh, Joan (May 1, 2011). "How the "Lost Cause" poisoned our history books: Ulysses S. Grant championed civil rights in the South during Reconstruction — and he's still paying dearly for it". Salon.
Books
- Bordewich, Fergus (2023). Klan War: Ulysses S. Grant and the Battle to Save Reconstruction. Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-593-31782-2.
- Catton, Bruce (1953). A Stillness at Appomattox. Doubleday.
- Grant, Ulysses S. (1885). Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant. Vol. I. Charles L. Webster and Company.
- —— (1885). Personal Memoirs of U. S. Grant. Vol. II. Charles L. Webster and Company.
- Poore, Benjamin Perley; Tiffany, O. H. (1885). Life of U. S. Grant. Hubbard Bros. ISBN 978-0795018916.
- Porter, Lorle (2005). Politics & Peril: Mount Vernon, Ohio in the Nineteenth Century. New Concord Press. ISBN 978-1-887932-25-7.
- Reeves, John (2023). Soldier of Destiny: Slavery, Secession, and the Redemption of Ulysses S. Grant. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 978-1-63936-528-9. Focus on 1860–1861.
- Simpson, Brooks D. (1991). Let Us Have Peace: Ulysses S. Grant and the Politics of War and Reconstruction, 1861-1868. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0807819661.
- Wilson, Edmund (1962). "Northern Soldiers: Ulysses S. Grant". Patriotic Gore: Studies in the Literature of the American Civil War. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-31256-0.
- Young, John Russell (1879a). Around the World with General Grant. Vol. I. American News Company.
- —— (1879b). Around the World with General Grant. Vol. II. American News Company.
External links
Media from Commons
Quotations from Wikiquote
Texts from Wikisource
Data from Wikidata
- Ulysses S. Grant Presidential Library
- Ulysses S. Grant Personal Manuscripts
- Works by Ulysses S. Grant at Project Gutenberg
- Works by Ulysses S. Grant at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- Ulysses S. Grant: A Resource Guide – Library of Congress
- In Our Time: President Ulysses S. Grant, BBC Radio 4 discussion with Robert Cooke, Eric Matheson, and Susan Mary Grant (May 30, 2019)
- Ulysses S. Grant on C-SPAN
- The Papers of Ulysses S. Grant at Mississippi State University
- Scholarly coverage of Grant at the Miller Center, University of Virginia
