Talk:Wing Sam Chinn

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Toadspike in topic Does a source not mention the subject?

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Wing Sam Chinn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 23:30, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs) 05:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


Hey! I look forward to reviewing this article! Just to let you know, I am a bit busy in real life right now, so I can't promise I can get to reviewing straight away, but expect comments by this Sunday. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 05:16, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

First Pass: The Basics

edit
  •  Y Article is stable
  •  Y Pictures are PD and properly sourced and are relevant
  •  Y Article includes a clear list of references
  •  Y No glaring spelling/grammar, source, prose issues

When I find more free time, I will go deeper, but this first pass is a basic check to make sure that the article is worth reviewing at a deeper level.

Second Pass

edit
  •  Y Copyvio looks alright
  • original research check:
    • AGF on reference 4; can't easily access
    • In the second half of the first biography paragraph, do you mean to link the PCAD ref inline? It looks like you pulled info about Chinn's life there that I couldn't find in the references you provided inline.
    • Otherwise, the article looks pretty good OR-wise.
  • I made some minor copyedits, so if you want to take a look, go ahead and do so.
  • Totally up to you, but I'd recommend splitting up as well as the Chinaland Restaurant on the Bothell-Everett Highway from the rest of the sentence. It may be grammatically correct, but it gets a little awkward to read (but splitting up might not sound better, your choice  ).

@Generalissima: Hey, this article is in pretty good shape and looks ready to pass as long as you intelligently respond to the minor suggestions I've made. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 00:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 21:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
Chong Wa Benevolent Association Building
Improved to Good Article status by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 83 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:39, 30 September 2024 (UTC).Reply

  •   New enough GA (what a really cool subject!). Hook is fascinating and within the parameters. Image looks good to go for running on the main page—maybe I'll write an article for the building? QPQ done. No concerns regarding refs, copyvio, etc. Great work! ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


Does a source not mention the subject?

edit

@Generalissima Hey there, I noticed that source 3 [1] doesn't mention the subject at all. Am I missing something? If it doesn't mention him, could it be removed? (To be clear, this isn't OR, since Source 1 backs that sentence up, I'm just curious why Source 3 was used.) Toadspike [Talk] 13:50, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Toadspike: I used that source so I can say where in the city that school is. It can be removed if need be Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 15:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Aha, that makes a lot of sense. No need to remove it, sorry for bothering you! Toadspike [Talk] 19:59, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply