Talk:Wake Up and Escape from the Citadel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

@Gen. Quon: Will take (again). Expect a review in the week or next week. ₂₃W 04:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

@Gen. Quon: Reviewing this now since I'm going on break until January. The merge looks good, but here are some comments:

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead is way too long at four paragraphs, should be shortened to at most two per WP:LEADLENGTH (I know other episode articles have three, but even those are looking too long).

   I merged it into three. How does it look now? I know it's still a bit long, but considering this is two episodes smashed into one article, I feel it makes sense.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All sources are reliable, and the self-published sources are acceptable per WP:ABOUTSELF.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Why did you get rid of the cultural references section of Escape from the Citadel? I thought that was cool, and it gave the io9 source.

   Whoops. I just forgot to move it. It's there now.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   I could pick on the lengthy quotes in the reception section, but overall this looks nice. Can't really pick on the prose much. On hold for two weeks. ₂₃W 01:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

   Sorry for the delay. How's it look now?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:46, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

   @Gen. Quon: Looks good! Though if you take it to FAC, I'd recommend reordering the lead and reception section for length's sake. Pass. ₂₃W 04:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)