Talk:U.S. federal government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
 | Material from COVID-19 pandemic in the United States was split to U.S. federal government response to the COVID-19 pandemic on 7 July 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. |
 | The contents of the COVID-19 policy of the Joe Biden administration page were merged into U.S. federal government response to the COVID-19 pandemic on June 20, 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Federal Reserve section
editDo we need to work this Reuter's article entitled New York Fed pledges to offer $1 trillion a day in overnight repo loans into the Federal Reserve section? Repo loans (aka repurchase agreements) don't appear to be mentioned so far.
Do we need to work this CNBC article entitled Trump demands more Fed action in coronavirus response even after $1.5 trillion liquidity injection into the Federal Reserve section? It mentions $1.5 trillion in short-term loans. That $1.5 trillion amount is not mentioned in that section up to that date.
The Federal Reserve section stops after March 23. What happened after that?
How much money did the Fed end up spending on coronavirus bailout? Was it in the form of loans? What percent are likely to be repaid? –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- Pinging a couple of the original authors of this section. Maybe they can help expand this section. @Beland, Soibangla, Juxlos, and PRRfan: Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
More concise name
editAny objections to renaming this to "U.S. federal government response to COVID-19"? If not, I'll probably move it in a day or two. –Novem Linguae (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- Did not see this before, but anyway, why? Every other article that deals with the same topic in other countries is titled the same way:
- British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Indian government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Indian state government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Philippine government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Russian government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic
- Swedish government response to the COVID-19 pandemic
- I'd say the current title is better. Love of Corey (talk) 08:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Operation Warp Speed
editWhy does it feel like this Wikipedia article is attempting to hide the existence of, much less the accomplishments of, Operation Warp Speed? - I am dis big (talk) 21:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge. 3 weeks have elapsed with no discussion. Phillip Samuel (talk) 23:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
I propose to merge COVID-19 policy of the Joe Biden administration into U.S. federal government response to the COVID-19 pandemic. I think that the content in the former article can easily be explained in the context of latter, and the fed govt article is of a reasonable size that the merging of the former will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Phillip Samuel (talk) 18:41, 2 June 2021 (UTC)