This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The new addition does not seem particularly notable and mostly just more anti-Rangers tabloid POV. This is the only reference to the incident I can really find and it does not seem to be a major event in the guys life (as opposed to the death of his wife, which needs a mention). More non-notable BLP twaddle to my mind --ErrantTmorton166(Talk)18:48, 16 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's 100% relevant to the death of his wife, though. The Scotsman is not a tabloid, as has been pointed out, and the chants are a matter of public record. That they reflect badly on Rangers is not 'anti-Rangers tabloid POV'. The link is not dead either, it's archived. Incident is notable and appropriately cited so if you want to take it out, you'll need to go to arbitration. --Weirdingmodule (talk) 13:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
