Talk:Slowpoke/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Slowpoke. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Name
How is "Slowpoke" derived from "Slowpoke"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.122.87 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
DESU
is the 118 DESUs necessary?i haven't watched pokemon in a long time,dont remember that much desus. Adaobi YELL!!done 10:52, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Really? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.224.208.5 (talk • contribs) 12:08, 6 May 2007
- You can never have too much DESU. Snarfies 02:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
I'm surprised that this article doesn't even mention Slowpoke as a meme — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.22.163 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's usually because the meme isn't popular enough to warrant it; for benchmarks see All Your Base Are Belong To Us or Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny. -Jeske (v^_^v) 23:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Vandalism
Brace for vandalism! —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisIsRealPuma (talk • contribs) 11:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. I am working on this page now, restoring the damage done and improving the content and sourcing. Colonel Warden (talk) 17:58, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Content
I have been working on this article over the past few weeks but had to suspend activities due to TTN's disruptive edits and the consequent Arbcom case in which he has been warned off. Urutapu seems to have picked up his baton and dismissive attitude: he calls for discussion but then fails to discuss. I have discussed this article before as you can see above but I cannot see any discussion points from Urutapu or TTN.
For Urutapu's benefit, the reference to The Economist refers to a recent detailed article in which they said that Wikipedia had detailed articles on many hundreds of Pokemon. Its many readers might form a poor impression of our project if they checked and found that this was apparently not so. I plan to remedy this and restore our reputation. Colonel Warden (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)