Talk:Peopling of the Americas

(Redirected from Talk:Settlement of the Americas)
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Doug Weller in topic Unjustifiably definitive tone.

Citations

edit
  • Bruce B. Huckell; J. David Kilby (2014). Clovis Caches: Recent Discoveries and New Research. UNM Press. ISBN 978-0-8263-5483-9.
  • Claude Chapdelaine (2012). Late Pleistocene Archaeology and Ecology in the Far Northeast. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-1-60344-805-5.
  • Neil Asher Silberman; Alexander A. Bauer (2012). The Oxford Companion to Archaeology. Oxford University Press. pp. 57–78. ISBN 978-0-19-973578-5.
  • Timothy R. Pauketat (2012). The Oxford Handbook of North American Archaeology. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-538011-8.
  • John F. Hoffecker; Scott A. Elias (2013). Human Ecology of Beringia. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-50388-4.
  • Vivien Gornitz (2009). Encyclopedia of Paleoclimatology and Ancient Environments. Springer Science & Business Media. p. 207. ISBN 978-1-4020-4551-6.
  • Terry L. Jones; Alice A. Storey; Elizabeth A. Matisoo-Smith (2011). Polynesians in America: Pre-Columbian Contacts with the New World. Rowman Altamira. ISBN 978-0-7591-2006-8. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Elizabeth Matisoo-Smith; Lisa Matisoo-Smith; K. Ann Horsburgh (2012). DNA for Archaeologists. Left Coast Press. pp. 130–... ISBN 978-1-59874-682-2.
  • Graeme Wynn (2007). Canada and Arctic North America: An Environmental History. ABC-CLIO. p. 6. ISBN 978-1-85109-437-0.

EL for 30,000 years ago

edit

See [1] and [2]. Doug Weller talk 10:05, 17 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"First settlers of the Americas" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect First settlers of the Americas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § First settlers of the Americas until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:55, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Unjustifiably definitive tone.

edit

The language within this article should be changed to better reflect the distinction between a best supported theory and a proven theory. The current tone of the introductory summary gives the reader the impression that the theory of first peopling over the Beringian ice bridge is proven or settled science, which does not accurately reflect the relevant fields or the philosophy of science.

I do not believe this is an insignificant semantic, especially because this topic is vastly more contested, complicated, and harder to study (given that all the archeological evidence that could’ve been gathered from the ice bridge is now at the bottom of the ocean) than the peopling of regions in Eurasia, and yet uses a similarly definitive tone. 2603:8080:A200:4E0B:112E:98CC:50C:6C74 (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

You can't prove a theory. Doug Weller talk 09:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply