Talk:Renewal (Kreator album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Kreator-renewal.jpg

Image:Kreator-renewal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Renewal.jpg

Image:Renewal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 14 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (non-admin closure) NW1223(^{Howl at me}/_{My hunts}) 02:13, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

---

Renewal (album) → Renewal (Kreator album) – Following the publishing of Renewal (Billy Strings album), I believe it is necessary to move this article to differentiate the two articles per WP:QUALIFIER. cheezejack | talk | contributions - 01:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

• Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 03:33, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 03:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support. The Billy Strings album article is still fairly new, but is getting more views than the Kreator album.[1] It's unlikely there will be a clear primary topic in the near future. Station1 (talk) 07:15, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support per WP:ALBUMDAB. 162 etc. (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
• Support the Billy Strings album has 2,269 views compared with only 951 for this one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.