Talk:International response to Innocence of Muslims protests

Number of Americans dead?

This sentence gives the total number of Americans killed as five: Stevens + Smith + DOherty + two Marines = Five. This contradicts almost every account I have read. I think that the two ex-SEALs (Doherty and Woods) were initially erroneously identified as Marines.

"In Benghazi, attacks killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith, American private security employee Glen Doherty,[1] two U.S. Marines, and ten Libyan policemen;[2] and injured two others."

I am going to remove the mention of the Marines and include Woods - If anyone has a reason not to do this, let's discuss. KConWiki (talk) 11:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Supranational bodies vs International Organisation

My edit summary was cut off due to the word count but what I intended to say to you E4024 was that if you do decide to revert my edit, let's discuss it here, I have no problem with either but I just feel that Supranational bodies is less ambiguous. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 11:26, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

International Organizations - Edit request

(Rather than the ridiculous section title of "Supranational bodies".)

- The section title must be changed.

- UN must be on top as it is the universal international/intergovernmental political organization and cannot be placed under two "regional" international (intergovernmental) organizations.

- Last but certainly not the least: While this (and other related) article(s) were being initiated I had introduced, in several sentences, the reaction of the OIC (from the mouth of its Secretary General), the sole universal international/intergovernmental organization of the countries with a major moslem population. I do not know who and for which POV made it somehow "disappear" but whose statement is more notable here, of the EU, of the tiny (but richie) GCC or the OIC, not for having 57 member states but for being the ultimate representative body of the "islamic" countries...

Someone with experience please find that "missing" edit regarding the OIC and place it between UN and EU reactions. (Working in WP is sometimes like a 007 movie, FGS!) --E4024 (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

So, why do you consider the title, "Supranational bodies" ridiculous? I honestly don't see what the problem is, it's used in Reactions to the death of Osama bin Laden, International reactions to the Syrian civil war, International reactions to the 2011 Egyptian revolution among many other articles. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 11:57, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Simple. I only react to the ridicule in the articles that I visit. --E4024 (talk) 12:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

How about, International bodies? It connotes less to my previous concern and seems like a perfect compromise between the two. YuMaNuMa ^Contrib 12:05, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I insist on my all three edit requests... --E4024 (talk) 13:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Joint statement

The Arab League, African Union, EU made a joint statement [[1]] How should we put it.

Stupid title

I think the title sound unprofessional, especially since it is pretty well agreed now that the Benghazi attack didn't have any direct relation to the movie.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

• @Bellerophon5685, I am just an occasional visitor to this page, but thought I would mention that there is some discussion taking place on this issue at Wikipedia_talk:Redirect#Reactions_to_the_2012_diplomatic_missions_attacks_re-directed.3F Ottawahitech (talk) 14:36, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

I agree. It is terrible. Proposals? Plot Spoiler (talk) 03:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Totally agree. The title sounds stupid and is misleading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.115.137.78 (talk) 01:57, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Article doesn't match title

Most of this article seems to be about the Benghazi incident, which had nothing to do with the film. The article needs to be heavily edited, retitled, or split into two articles.119.9.79.13 (talk) 11:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

How can the title be changed? I want to change it to "International Response to 'Innocence of Muslims' protests", but I can't figure out how to do that (new user, sorry) Isaac rowe1 (talk) 21:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 3 January 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to International response to Innocence of Muslims protests (no quote marks), unopposed for over a week. Jenks24 (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

---

International response to the reactions to Innocence of Muslims → International response to 'Innocence of Muslims' protests – The article is about the specific protests and attacks allegedly provoked by the film, not general reactions to the film. Also, the current title is unwieldy ("Response to the reactions of..." has too many prepositions) Isaac rowe1 (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on International response to Innocence of Muslims protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120916034808/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr091112.html to http://egypt.usembassy.gov/pr091112.html
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120914175214/http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Obama-Says-Romney-Didn-t-Have-His-Facts-3861043.php to http://www.sfgate.com/business/bloomberg/article/Obama-Says-Romney-Didn-t-Have-His-Facts-3861043.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on International response to Innocence of Muslims protests. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120912182741/http://pm.gov.ly/news/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B5-%D8%A3%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AB-%D9%82%D9%86%D8%B5%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%8A.html to http://pm.gov.ly/news/%D8%A8%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A8%D8%AE%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B5-%D8%A3%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%AB-%D9%82%D9%86%D8%B5%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%8A%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AA%D8%AD%D8%AF%D8%A9-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A3%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%83%D9%8A%D8%A9-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A8%D9%86%D8%BA%D8%A7%D8%B2%D9%8A.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307001551/http://egypt.usembassy.gov/ to http://egypt.usembassy.gov/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 15 November 2017 (UTC)