Talk:Propargyl bromide

Group #22

Review #1 Wow, a lot of good information! Great work with the chem box and the pictures, plenty of good information there. Great job in finding information on the history of the compound, it adds to the page wonderfully. However, for your reactions section, I would try to add an example reaction or two, if you can find them. That will enhance that section nicely. Also, it seems that you are repeating some information between your chem box, properties section, and health hazards section. I would look into that and maybe remove some parts where the information is duplicated. Try to format your references according to Wikipedia standards, using actual citations and not just the website where you got the information from. I'm not sure that you have to repeat citations if information is coming from the same source, so you could probably reduce the number of citations down because of that. Hope this helps!

Tom Smith Tsmith60 (talk) 17:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #2 Nice job on this one! The info box is very detailed. You might want to think about removing the properties section of the article, though, it seems to be the same information that is given in the info box. The health hazards portion is very informative, but maybe consider taking out the information about the rats (that last paragraph). That part might not be necessary. Also, although you had plenty of references, I think you only need to write each reference once and refer to the citation made for each source throughout the article instead of re-citing the same source. For the reactions portion of your article, it would be a good idea to describe how the mentioned reactions proceed instead of just stating that these reactions take place. I saw you included the graph for Infrared spectra, maybe this could be mentioned in your article? I hope I gave you some good advice! Good luck!

Tijana Popovic Tpopovi2 (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #3 After comparing the first one with this one, I am very impressed. This one is very complete and it seems like you guys were able to find a good amount of information on this chemical. One thing you guys can add are the actual reactions that chemically show how they take place. Also as mentioned above, you dont need so many of the same sources. You can just list that source once and link them to that one source at any point of your article. Besides the sources and reactions, this article is pretty solid. Just make sure to read over the instructions one more time so that you dont miss points by accident.

Alex Plavnik Plavnik2 (talk) 24:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Review #4

Much more info on this page compared to the first! Very complete chembox. You have tons of resources, but lots of them are duplicates. Also, I don't think they are formatted correctly at the bottom of the page. Maybe look into fixing those things. Also, aesthetically, you could move the "contents" box below the chemical name. Otherwise, it looks like you have a good start on this page. Try to add a bit more to each section to beef it up!

Nicole Wank Wank2 (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)