Talk:Nottingham city centre
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nottingham city centre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Project Nottinghamshire
editPlease feel free to join and contribute to Wikipedia:WikiProject Nottinghamshire. KlickingKarl (talk) 16:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was No consensus to merge. It has been 3 years and both articles have been expanded significantly, so a merge is not necessary. Removing the template. (non-admin closure)--Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:57, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
I propose that Nottingham City Centre be merged into Nottingham. The articles entirely overlap and readers are best served with one comprehensive article. -- Rushton2010 (talk) 19:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Good idea 88.104.105.119 (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
I agree. Perhaps a section in the Nottingham article could be created and/or expanded to deal with the city centre. 88.104.105.206 (talk) 14:09, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Oppose. Most other major city centres in the UK have their own article - see Category:Central business districts in the United Kingdom. Nottingham's city centre doesn't seem any less notable than those. Would it not be better to improve this article? JimmyGuano (talk) 06:00, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Harvey Nichols Citation
editUnder 'shopping', there is an uncited claim regarding the Broadmarsh Intu development, which has been up in arms for years now. Whilst it may be true that eventually a Harvey Nichols may exist one day, could the fact that there appears to be no citation, as well as the unstable development of Broadmarsh Intu, warrant the removal of this line? Npig03 (talk) 11:40, 18 February 2024 (UTC)