Talk:Mount Süphan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mount Süphan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editElevation 4058 m (not 4158 m). Look rusian topographical map http://turcja.suder.cc/MAPY/suphan.php Bsuder 11:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Süphan < Sophene?
editBöri (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
More likely Süp < Surp (holy) Meowy 23:19, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Second-highest?
editArticle (and citation) claims Süphan is the second-highest volcano in the Armenian Highland, but the Armenian Highland article lists both Mount Ararat and Mount Aragats as higher... Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:57, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mount Süphan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386g/turkey.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091028042701/http://turcja.suder.cc/MAPY/suphan.php to http://turcja.suder.cc/MAPY/suphan.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)