Talk:Michael Fors Olson
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Cabayi in topic Arlington Carmel controversy
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations on Fr Kirkham story?
editI don't see any citations on the fr kirkham story. Should this be removed until provided? 401kNotFound (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I think it should. I have just tagged it as citation needed, but seeing your comment, I will take it out. Tacyarg (talk) 19:09, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Arlington Carmel controversy
edit75.18.38.30, please explain why the section Arlington Carmel controversy should be removed from the article. It is sources include a couple of reliable, verifiable, independent secondary sources as well as primary sources on both sides of the conflict. Edit warring over the content of articles is not good for the project, and not good for your continued access to editing privileges. Cabayi (talk) 12:20, 12 November 2024 (UTC)