This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 09:49, December 18, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I notice on the article on Canet guns it initially gives the size as "32cm", just like here, but then says that "the guns supplied to the Japanese fired a 112cm shell", which I find hard to believe, that being something over 44 inches in diameter. Also, it certainly looks more like 12-13" in the photographs. I'm not sure where this discrepancy came from (perhaps the editor meant they are 112cm in length?), but I thought I'd point it out. I also think the article on the Matsushima could have a better main image. There are perfectly clear photos on the bottom of the page, so why use that drawing? AnnaGoFast (talk) 20:37, 14 February 2016 (UTC)Reply