Talk:Martyn Evans (philosopher)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Speedy deletion
editWhy is the subject of the article not noteworthy? He is a high up academic, editor and author. Considering many Durham Principals who are of his academic note have their own articles, why not him?
See the following for articles of a related topic, who you might argue are of equal note, none of whom have speedy deletion pages, and indeed, whose articles have been present for a while on wikipedia.
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/William_Sanday http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Edward_Henry_Bradby http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/William_George_Henderson
With regard to pages on academics, there are several non-durham academics who have articles of a similar calibre who you might argue showed little note, but whose articles remain:
http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Aziz_Al-Azmeh http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Alex_Prichard http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Edward_Royle http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Philip_England http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Rodney_Hilton
...and that was just a 30 second search.
He is noteworthy under wikipedia noteworthy guideline for academics, criteria number 3, as an honorary fellow of the RCGP. One might also add that as a Principal of a Durham College he is noteworthy under criteria 5 or 6.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ex1123 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)