This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Some info on lobbying by Amazon was removed challenging Law360 as a reliable source [1]. It seemed OK to me when I included it. Can we discuss its merits? ☆ Bri (talk) 18:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
My mistake, I meant JD Supra which admit doesn’t havethe same editorial control but it is posting the legal experts' interpretation, but no big deal. I have reinstated the passage with a Reuters source which is certainly regarded to be a gold standard in terms of reliability and independence. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
As a p.s., the source used the term "public policy team" which is what Amazon uses [2], explaining its function is "enhances Amazon’s advocacy before policymakers at all levels of government". We need to write in plain language, so I added a parenthetical to state the plain term lobbying. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2021 (UTC)Reply