Talk:MAN SE
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
History
editThis article should include a history section.
Agreed. There's a large gap of its history during world war two for example. The Panther medium tank was an important and famous tank during the war and yet no reference to this? I believe this article needs to include a lot more of the company's history. 203.118.180.219 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Elysium203.118.180.219 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Everyone was on vacation! Kar98 (talk) 02:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
According to the company's anniversary film, MAN is a merged company between Maschinenfabrik Augsburg and Nurnburg. So,Rudolph Diesel is not it's founder202.93.37.90 (talk) 06:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
The company
editMost of this article had been set up to focus on the bus division. The bus division accounts for about 7% of total sales. This company is so much more than a "bus" maker. It get slightly over 30% of sales from the TRUCK division, the biggest single revenue driver of the company (no pun intended).
2004 revenue breakdown:
- 7,409 49.6% MAN Nutzfahrzeuge AG
- 3,185 21.3 MAN Ferrostaal AG
- 1,620 10.8 MAN Roland Druckmaschinen AG
- 1,421 9.5 MAN B&W Diesel AG
- --659 4.4 MAN TURBO AG
- __________
- percent 95.6 Total Divisions
- Misc: 4.4 (including financial transactions)
- €14,947 Total
Please help to add more about the other division, not just the bus division. WikiDon 08:06, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
SAF Singapore Armed Forces is using Man AG tonners
edithttp://www.mindef.gov.sg/armynews/display1.asp?ArticleId=168 http://www.mindef.gov.sg/cyberpioneer/backissues_may03_2.htm
Fair use rationale for Image:MAN logo290306.jpg
editImage:MAN logo290306.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:34, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
WWII
editSeems quite strange to omit any mention of the fact that hundreds of WWII German U-boats were powered by MAN diesels. Sca (talk) 19:17, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
MAN SE vs. MAN Group
edit"MAN Group" is not an exact synonym for MAN SE (previously MAN AG): to quote page 73 of the 2008 MAN AG Annual Report: The MAN Group is headed by MAN Aktiengesellschaft, which is the Group’s Corporate Center. Therefore I think the description "parent company of the MAN Group" is an accurate one for MAN SE. Letdorf (talk) 13:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC).
Article layout
editThis article has a strange layout with a huge blank space and what in effect is a gallery above the main body of the article. Is this some new style to wikipedia articles ?
Looking at the German one in comparison to this it is sadly lacking something. (unfortunately i cannot read german so cannot see what is missing). All the bus bit seems out of place /unbalanced and would have thought that would in the subsidary article MAN AG Buses with some summary history in MAN SE and more in the Bus article. Other subsidaries such as the Wolffkran are missing (seen in most major cities) but there is a German article Here. For a major European company with a long history this is one of the most disappointing wikipedia articles I have seen.
BTW: The Bus article Hybrid section was all copy vio, from the man hybrid web site page.
- BulldozerD11 (talk) 03:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've moved the "gallery" images into an actual gallery under the Subsidiaries section, for want of a better place. Feel free to expand the parts you feel are lacking. You could always run the German WP page through Google Translate or similar to get some idea of its content. Letdorf (talk) 13:17, 17 February 2010 (UTC).
- Hi Letdorf, layout looks better now. Thanks for suggestion on translation, I have used it before but its still very hard to make sense of and copy and paste gets garbled results that tak so much cleaning up. Have discovered that Wolffkran were actually sold to a mbo/venture capital group in 2005. And other non core business were disposed of. It was too late to look at fixing articles after the side trip to the bus article. At least i found the company (Wolff) web site.
- This is just one of thousands of articles I could fix if i had the time (was rather late when i found it) so better to flag up as walk on by and never find my way back. - BulldozerD11 (talk) 20:09, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of MAN SE's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "AR2013":
- From Celesio: "Annual Report 2013" (PDF). Hannover Re. Retrieved 11 March 2014.
- From Axel Springer AG: "Axel Springer SE Annual Report 2013". Retrieved 24 April 2014.
{{cite web}}
: Unknown parameter|deadurl=
ignored (|url-status=
suggested) (help) - From Fielmann: "Annual Report 2013" (PDF). Fielmann. Retrieved 30 April 2014.
- From Aareal Bank: "Annual Report 2013" (PDF). Aareal Bank AG. Retrieved 20 May 2014.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:56, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
M-A-N North Carolina?
editThe Freightliner article, which links to here, mentions taking over a M-A-N plant in Cleveland, NC, in 1989. Yet there is no mention of US manufacturing anywhere in this article. 50.0.36.187 (talk) 17:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
List(s) of products?
editAre there any sources that would allow collating a list of MAN'a key products? E.g.: list of trucks manufactured / designed by MAN. Regards, DPdH (talk) 14:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
German or European?
editIt think it should be "MAN SE ... is a European mechanical engineering company" instead of "MAN SE ... is a German mechanical engineering company". What do you know or think? --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Dead link
editLink 21 goes to a 404 page:
"GIR Search - GIR - Global Investigations Review". globalinvestigationsreview.com. Retrieved 15 July 2020. 216.243.58.119 (talk) 22:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)