Talk:List of plants in the Bible
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of plants in the Bible article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-01-27. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIs there a way to have an option to organize the references in order of appearance in the bible, in addition to or instead of alphabetically? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.64.210.198 (talk) 02:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
editThis article is somewhat missleading since the names of the plant in the bible have a different meaning than the one used today. e.g. pine (Jerusalem pine). Omri
- Well, that would be the task of any translator, wouldn't it? To find out which plants are meant originally?
- As the original names are in Hebrew and date back several thousand years, there is always the question of correct translations. And for many Biblical plants, this question cannot be answered for certain. But that doesn't mean it's not worth trying, does it? Anna (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Links
editHow about linking this article to the corresponding ones in other languages (in both directions, if possible)? E.g. this one: http://de.wiki.x.io/wiki/Pflanzen_in_der_Bibel
Maybe someone who knows how to do it would be so kind as to do it? Anna (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
Criteria for inclusion
editI notice that the original article and the clone both list such things as “pine” and “flowers”. This suggests the problematic nature of the list as its contributors have conceptualized it. Consider:
- Genesis 2:5: And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground.
That picks up every cultivar that the author(s) would have believed existed in that first week-or-so.
My suggestion is that the article have an explicit discussion of the issue, a section on plants more specifically mentioned in the Bible, and a section of any other plants that are frequently used in these gardens based upon archæological evidence or somesuch. —SlamDiego←T 14:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of plants in the Bible. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060305080224/http://www.odu.edu/sci/lmusselm/post/bible_dictionary.html to http://www.odu.edu/sci/lmusselm/post/bible_dictionary.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 1 January 2018 (UTC)