This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I am not a native English speaker and not familiar with the respective terms worldwide. But to my impression this article was created based on one single source and the sole reason that Isuzu used this term in its advertising resp. web page. Both Cab over and Cab forward exist, thus this here is redundant. In a Low cab forward truck I would expect something like a Mercedes-Benz Econic, but this is even not listed here. The Renault Magnum has a very high cab which was first with a flat floor in Europe, clearly a "High cab forward". But many trucks can be ordered with different cabins like the Mercedes-Benz Atego with 3 different heights to choose from, thus is it a low or a high cab forward? --Wolle1303 (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Just though I'd copy my suggestions from the deletion discussion here since the consensus was keep. We could choose one of the following:
Merge the list into List of trucks. This list is a subset of that one, but the trucks list has a tag suggesting a split. If someone does get around to splitting it someday, it could be split into light/medium/heavy duty, or cab over/conventional.
Create a Low Cab Forward article. This would be a specific type of cab over vehicle, but it needs to be well defined. I tried with the lead sentence of the list, but it needs a reference. Then move the list there as examples. If there's not enough to justify a new LCF article, then at least define it in the Cab over article.
Expand the list to include all cab over trucks, not just "Low Cab Forward". This would involve splitting List of trucks as mentioned above, and it may be decided cab over/conventional isn't as good a way to split it as light/medium/heavy duty. --Vossanovao<14:11, 30 March 2023 (UTC)Reply