Talk:Joni 95

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Asian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Sri Lanka Low‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

No need of deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I don't understand why this page is suggested for deletion. No such page exist in wikipedia. I want to know the real reason for the proposed deletion. Gopal Raji (talk) 02:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Gopal Raji, all articles need to be notable, which means that they meet certain basic guidelines (WP:GNG). The most important of which is that the information contained in the article must be verifiable, that is you must provide independent reliable sources/references within the article. This article provides no sources whatsoever. I have undertaken a search of the web and can not find any reliable secondary sources. If you are able please include them in the article. Dan arndt (talk) 04:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

There has been the addition of three references (18 September 2017) however they are basically mentions in passing- particularly Ref [3]. The article however still doesn't satisfy WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 01:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic