Talk:Johnson Space Center/Archive 1

Archive 1

Location

When NASA-JSC was built ('63), it was NOT in Houston, only Harris county. JSC was in the "Clear Lake Area" which was incorporated by Houston in the mid 70s. The entry is correct to claim that JSC IS indeed in Clear Lake, a part of Houston, which it is. There are plenty of people who work at JSC who are not aware of the history and relationship between Clear Lake and JSC. --Railgun

No one is arguing that JSC is not within the political boundaries of Houston, nor that Clear Lake City is even a city - which it is not. Both are within the political boundaries of Houston. However, Clear Lake City is suburb of Houston (an area of Houston). Given the land area the city of Houston occupies, saying it is "in Houston" gives little indication of its location. JSC is approximately 25 miles from downtown Houston. When JSC opened it was not within the Houston city limits. The Clear Lake community came into existence partly because of JSC. Residents of Clear Lake fought to incorporate themselves as a city and prevent annexation by Houston. That failed.

Saying "The Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center (JSC), located in Clear Lake City, Texas, a suburb of Houston" is a correct statement. Many people in the Houston-Galveston Bay area associate Clear Lake with NASA-JSC. It's a slap in the face to people like me to ignore this strong association. What is the Clear Lake community's annual festival called - "Lunar Rendezvous" - organized by whom - The Clear Lake Area Chamber of Commerce.

Working at JSC hardly makes anyone an authority on the history of Clear Lake and JSC. I work at JSC too. My father started working at JSC in 1963 (when my family moved here) - retiring as a manager in MOD in 1995. I've lived in Clear Lake since 1973 and another local community before that. Most of the people who work at JSC moved here in the late 80s or 90s.

Also, using JSC's addresses is not relevant (see opening paragraph) since we are not saying that JSC is not within the political boundaries of Houston. El Lago's mailing address is Seabrook. Does that mean that the residents of El Lago live in Seabrook?

The additional clause "a suburb of Houston" validates that JSC is in Houston, but the previous part gives us more exact details of not only where in Houston, but to the history of JSC. Railgun 15:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

I have to agree. I think this is an issue of reflecting the spirit rather than the letter. Claer Lake and JSC are integrally tied, as I'm sure even our anon would agree. · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 16:26, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Clear Lake City is a master-planned community, now built-out (with a small portion in incorporated Pasadena). JSC was here before the residential master-planned development of Clear Lake City. Clear Lake City is the name of a residential development which was in Houston's ETJ before annexed. It never was a government or municipal entity. If you would go research or ask the homeowner's association of the master-planned community of Clear Lake City for a boundary map of Clear Lake City, you would see clearly that JSC is not within the development of Clear Lake City, but is adjacent to Clear Lake City. Therefore, JSC is technically not in the boundary of Clear Lake City master-planned community. Colloquially, the whole area is referred to as "Clear Lake area." JSC is in fact in the "Clear Lake area" but is not within Clear Lake City. RJN 00:45, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

If we must be so nitpicky, how about we add "Clear Lake City area" and call it even? · Katefan0^(scribble)/mrp 01:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Expansion

Compared to the articles for Kennedy Space Center and Jet Propulsion Laboratory, this article is way too short and is missing important information about the missions conducted in JSC. --alexyu 02:49, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

List of Contractors

I think if there is going to be a list of contractors it should be a separate entry for all of NASA since even small contractors like Barrios Technology serves multiple NASA sites - not just JSC. Railgun 02:29, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Building Numbers

I wasn't aware that Building 5 contained a Space Station training area, only the Shuttle Mission Simulator. It's possible that I hadn't heard of it, but can its existance and location be verified? I was under the impression that all ISS training occured in the mockups in Building 9. Malderi 21:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, I asked this 2.5 weeks ago, and since nobody has changed it or verified it, I'm going to remove the reference to it until that happens. Malderi 05:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Building 5 does contain a Space Station training area, the Space Station Training Facility (SSTF). It's on the second floor, and consists of a control room and some medium fidelity mockups, originally developed by Hughes Aircraft/Raytheon and now maintained by United Space Alliance.

The SSTF contains the high fidelity software simulations of ISS systems that is linked to the SMS and the MCC during integrated simulations. The mockups in building 9 are higher fidelity physical mockups (you can open up panels and dig around in the hardware) but do not contain any software simulations and cannot be linked to the shuttle simulators in building 5. ISS training that requires good physical mockups (like maintenance) happens in building 9. Training that requires a big software simulation (like rendezvous and docking with the orbiter) happens in building 5. --Cyclone96 05:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

April 20, 2007

I'm recommending the page be locked due to the current event there. For what it's worth, I edited the entry slightly to make it less lurid. Johnny Wishbone 20:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

NASA has released a few statements regarding this.

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/home/index.html -Roswell Crash Survivor 20:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

When should it be considered that there should be a separate page for this activity? Don the Dev 21:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Wow, this is tragic. Same week as the VT massacre too :( copycats

I cleaned up the Stand-off section Fortunia 22:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Stop putting the name in, this is unconfirmed info and will be added as soon as it is confirmed.Hentai Jeff 23:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

merger: Prebreath Reduction Program

I merged some content from "Prebreath Reduction Program", since the notability of that article was questioned. It is in fact only half a sentence; handle it as you like.

Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:46, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Temporary,

I'm moving this here - will put it back in later after article is expanded. Thanks Postoak (talk) 03:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

An aerial view of the Johnson Space Center facility of Houston in 1989

More sources

Berger, Eric. "A small step for bill - but a leap for JSC." Houston Chronicle. July 15, 2010. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Questionable dates in the history section - fixed

Accodring to NASAFacts JSC 04264, construction on the Johnson Space Center began in April 1962 and the facility officially opened in September 1963. The info in this article doesn't seem to fit with those dates. Accord to the history section in this article, the facility was "opened in 1961". According to the NASAFacts paper, Houston wasn't even announced as the site until September, 1961. It's highly unlikely that they could have built and opened the Johnson Space Center within 4 months of announcing the city it would be built in. I'm going to go ahead and change the info in the article. If anyone knows something I don't, feel free to change it back. Kaldari (talk) 03:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

This has been fixed. Fallacious thinking: Manned Spacecraft Center refers to not just a building, but to an organization. The article today mentions how it was created from the Space Task Group and began its operations soon thereafter, from its original site and then in leased space in Houston until the physical plant was completed. JustinTime55 (talk) 14:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Space Shuttle training

NASA obviously isn't currently training its astronauts to fly a retired spacecraft (unless that is considered generic background training.) Information is needed about exactly how, and for what what (if anything) they're being trained today. JustinTime55 (talk) 14:48, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Suggest move

I think this should be redirect to more common name "Johnson Space Center." What do you think? 71.237.70.49 (talk) 07:21, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center is the official name. Postoak (talk) 22:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

So the hell what? Please read WP:COMMONNAME and WP:OFFICIALNAMES. Also see Talk:Kennedy Space Center#Requested move. The KSC article was in fact moved the other way around. Also see the centers' respective web sites: KSC home page and JSC home page. The centers publicly identify themselves by the short names, which are in fact the commonly used names. JustinTime55 (talk) 20:40, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Good refs

• Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center
• Suddenly, tomorrow came... A history of the Johnson Space Center (PDF format) 1993

Charles F. Abbey typed this — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.96.245.48 (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Undue weight in Space Shuttle history subsection

Sorry if anyone thinks this tag is overkill (that's Wikipedia's fault for not having more specifically appropriate templates), but I just wanted to call attention to the fact this section consists only of negative info: two shuttle disasters and a hurricane. Can't we have at least a paragraph neutrally written about how the historic Apollo command center was upgraded and handled the needs of the Shuttle program? Also, maybe the second paragraph goes out of scope when it mentions the second national service for the Columbia astronauts; what's relevant is the events held at JSC. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Date of opening?

Minor point but I see some sources that list the opening date as Sept. 1963 and some list Feb. 1964. I assume the discrepancy is probably when the site began operations and when the site had its opening ceremonies but does anybody know the details? --Mcorazao (talk) 17:56, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Very interesting; and it gets even stranger: the NASA monograph Suddenly Tomorrow Came says it "formally opened for business" in June 1964. Unfortunately, the references for the Sept. 1963 date are no longer available online. I'll try to keep digging. JustinTime55 (talk) 22:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Use of a biased source: LBJ's supposed influence on Houston selection?

Considering that, and the fact then President Johnson was a Texan, the choice became clear.

Biased, opinionated sources should be used only to establish that opinions exist on controversial subjects, never for blithe assertions without attribution about supposed facts. I have posted this usage on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Lyndon Johnson's political influence on selection of Houston Manned Spacecraft Center? and someone there seems to agree with me. It doesn't matter if "Johnson's influence is clearly described in the cited source" if it's only the author's opinion; please read WP:Reliable Sources#Biased or opinionated sources and WP:Reliable sources#Statements of opinion. There has been no notable, mainstream controversy established about Johnson's influence on the choice of Houston for MSC.

Who is Lily Koppel, and what makes her an authority on NASA's site selection processes for the Apollo program (as opposed to The Astronaut Wives Club (book))? That's a dubious kind of source to cite for the context of this article. No matter how much gossip about LBJ has been spread around, this is weak verification.

And the request for proof of a negative ("cite a source that establishes it did not happen") is never reasonable. That's the same "reasoning" fringe and conspiracy theorists use. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)