Talk:Red Sea crisis
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Red Sea crisis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 20 days |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
The contents of the United States–Houthi conflict (2023–present) page were merged into Red Sea crisis on 28 January 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
A news item involving Red Sea crisis was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on . |
|
Timeline
editHey @Pachu Kannan and @Linkin Prankster, I noticed that both of you are updating the timeline only in this article but not the main timeline one and the timeline section of this article is getting too big. I think we should move most routine attacks to the main timeline article and only keep the most notable stuff here. What do yall think? Abo Yemen✉ 07:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I agree to your opinion. Pachu Kannan (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes I agree. This article should only mention the significant incidents. Linkin Prankster (talk) 11:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- I concur. - Davidships (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok so how are we going to decide what is going to be kept here and what is going to get moved? Abo Yemen✉ 13:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- Incidents with significant media coverage should stay. And they should have been reported in more than three or four sources. Linkin Prankster (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- For starters, remove all those where the effects were either "undamaged" or "unknown", unless there is something particularly notable (eg first use of a new type of weapon). [corrected threading above] - Davidships (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- alr ima start Abo Yemen✉ 06:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- just found out that the timeline article is in the style of tables. Do we just move the text under the tables or what? Abo Yemen✉ 07:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Pachu Kannan, @Linkin Prankster, @Abo Yemen: So far as I can see, all the entries in the Timeline tables are already properly referenced and described, so I doubt whether this will be much to transfer there from non-notable incidents here. Are the working criteria above acceptable for a "first pass" at slimming this material down in this article? - Davidships (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Pachu Kannan, @Linkin Prankster, @Abo Yemen Any thoughts on this? - Davidships (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- Transfer all the attacks that weren't covered by a lot of sources, as well as claimed but unverified attacks, to the Timeline. Linkin Prankster (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- I support the opinion of Linkin Prankster. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Transfer all the attacks that weren't covered by a lot of sources, as well as claimed but unverified attacks, to the Timeline. Linkin Prankster (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Pachu Kannan, @Linkin Prankster, @Abo Yemen Any thoughts on this? - Davidships (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
- alr ima start Abo Yemen✉ 06:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Ok so how are we going to decide what is going to be kept here and what is going to get moved? Abo Yemen✉ 13:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
spelling mistake.
editthere is a spelling mistake in december 2024 section. ti should be to. i am not confirmed so someone please fix. thank you. Hamoodwiki (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 December 2024
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
There's a typo in the article. Please change "took took" to "took". Mchcopl (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)