Timeline

edit

Hey @Pachu Kannan and @Linkin Prankster, I noticed that both of you are updating the timeline only in this article but not the main timeline one and the timeline section of this article is getting too big. I think we should move most routine attacks to the main timeline article and only keep the most notable stuff here. What do yall think? Abo Yemen 07:38, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree to your opinion. Pachu Kannan (talk) 07:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes I agree. This article should only mention the significant incidents. Linkin Prankster (talk) 11:32, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
I concur. - Davidships (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok so how are we going to decide what is going to be kept here and what is going to get moved? Abo Yemen 13:12, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Incidents with significant media coverage should stay. And they should have been reported in more than three or four sources. Linkin Prankster (talk) 13:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
For starters, remove all those where the effects were either "undamaged" or "unknown", unless there is something particularly notable (eg first use of a new type of weapon). [corrected threading above] - Davidships (talk) 18:05, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
alr ima start Abo Yemen 06:46, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
just found out that the timeline article is in the style of tables. Do we just move the text under the tables or what? Abo Yemen 07:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Pachu Kannan, @Linkin Prankster, @Abo Yemen: So far as I can see, all the entries in the Timeline tables are already properly referenced and described, so I doubt whether this will be much to transfer there from non-notable incidents here. Are the working criteria above acceptable for a "first pass" at slimming this material down in this article? - Davidships (talk) 10:52, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Pachu Kannan, @Linkin Prankster, @Abo Yemen Any thoughts on this? - Davidships (talk) 20:16, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Transfer all the attacks that weren't covered by a lot of sources, as well as claimed but unverified attacks, to the Timeline. Linkin Prankster (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I support the opinion of Linkin Prankster. Pachu Kannan (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

spelling mistake.

edit

there is a spelling mistake in december 2024 section. ti should be to. i am not confirmed so someone please fix. thank you. Hamoodwiki (talk) 09:19, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done Chomik! (talk?) 14:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 December 2024

edit

There's a typo in the article. Please change "took took" to "took". Mchcopl (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done The AP (talk) 12:17, 8 December 2024 (UTC)Reply