 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Carpoid page were merged into Homalozoa on 16 March 2017. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Suggest merge
editSince even specialist texts on extinct echinoderms give the solutes only a page or two, would it be so bad to merge Solute (echinoderm) with this article? The other Homalozoa don't even have articles, and solute is even now no more than a couple of lines. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:15, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- As much as my gut instinct to keep the two pages separate entities, I think it would be best for now if we merge Solute into Homalozoa as a subsection.--Mr Fink (talk) 00:00, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Don't be sad...once the solute section grows a little, it can be put out into article space again. Think of it as bringing the tomato seedlings back into the greenhouse when there's a frost warning. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Speaking of which, we need to start a page for Melonechinus, too.--Mr Fink (talk) 16:05, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
I suggest merging in Carpoid, as the reference
- Imran Rahman (January–February 2009). "Making sense of carpoids". Geology Today. 25 (1): 34–38.
says they are the same thing: "carpoids ... are also known as homalozoans ..." —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Done