Talk:History of Islamic economics

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Buddytula in topic Sock edit clean-up, February 2018

Untitled

edit

Would "History of Islamic economics" be a better title? Thoughts?Bless sins (talk) 17:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

A paper from the School of Business at Auckland University of Technology is reliable.Bless sins (talk) 17:32, 12 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree. "History of Islamic economics" is indeed the best choice for this article. Because this article is about the history (mostly medieval history but also modern) of Islamic economics applications within Islamic societies. Khestwol (talk) 21:34, 27 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Islamic Capitalism?

edit

The section on free-market in Islam is misleading and inaccurate. Timur Kuran in his 2004 Journal of Economic Perspectives argues that the very institutions cited in this wiki, were responsible for stunting the growth of capitalism in Islamic East. Since Kuran is a world leader in economic history and economic thought in Islam, I think this section needs serious revision. mrjahan —Preceding comment was added at 22:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Islamic economics in the world

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Islamic economics in the world's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Oweiss":

  • From Labor theory of value: I. M. Oweiss (1988), "Ibn Khaldun, the Father of Economics", Arab Civilization: Challenges and Responses, New York University Press, ISBN 0887066984
  • From Muqaddimah: I. M. Oweiss (1988), "Ibn Khaldun, the Father of Economics", Arab Civilization: Challenges and Responses, New York University Press, ISBN 0887066984.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 12:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removal of Content: Lawsuits

edit

The citation for lawsuits (Ray Spier (2002), "The history of the peer-review process", Trends in Biotechnology 20 (8), p. 357-358 [357]. ) in the article is somewhat misleading. I have reviewed this citation and have a copy of it in personal possession. The author is candid in discarding any written history prior to 100 CE, deeming it unreliable. The first article he could find on peer review that fit his definition of history was a document around 820 CE indicating a right to sue based on peer review. It is disingenuous to assume that the ability of two opposing parties to appear before some institution of law to have their case heard and a judgement rendered, the definition of lawsuit, began at this point in time. Hschlarb (talk) 20:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

microcredit and microfinance

edit

How are these classed as Islamic when they charge high interest rates? Faro0485 (talk) 16:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Question about prohibitions

edit

Do the nations of Saudi Arabia and the Gulf emirates prohibit banking institutions that charge interest?

My understanding is that many majority-Moslem nations have a dual banking system: they charter "western-style" financial institutions on the one hand and "shariah-compliant" institutions on the other. Is this the case in the region I've mentioned above, or is there a unitary shariah-compliant system? I'm not trying to argue about it, just trying to be clear on the actual practices. --Christofurio (talk) 21:41, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of Islamic economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:00, 18 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Islamic economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Islamic economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sock edit clean-up, February 2018

edit

User:Swingoswingo, User:XLPeeker99p9, User:Oskimua, and User:Janosik-Ruzalka are all banned Sockpuppets who were involved in disruptive and dishonest editing. Special:Contributions/182.58.35.8 and Special:Contributions/182.58.103.195 are suspected socks. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Swingoswingo/Archive‎. The editor was a self-declared non-conformist for which he was banned. See the editor’s comment. The editor is clearly not here to contribute constructively. The editor’s usual practice had been to tag even source content and then delete them some time later. Besides being a self-declared Islamophobic, the editor used to delete positive content on Islam as here for example, and add highly biased and false information as here which was then reverted by another editor. -AsceticRosé 18:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

User:Clocktik 2thirty4 is yet another. Buddytula (talk) 21:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)Reply