Talk:Ghana Freedom

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Willbb234 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ghana Freedom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 10:58, 7 August 2019 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Immaculate
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
    Copyvio detector shows up well. Referenced suitably
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Having had no prior knowledge, I was well educated
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
    Although the majority of the reception was praise, it was well backed up by sources.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
    Stable, only one prior editor.
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Images would be extremely useful in this situation. Cannot find any, however
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Very well written and verified. Will need photos for improvement, as mentioned