Talk:Fordham University
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | Fordham University has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | ||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. An archive topic index is available here. |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Fordham University/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jzsj (talk · contribs) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
I am in the process of reviewing this article. Jzsj (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 2 February 2021 and 17 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alexa-playjonimitchell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:38, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
A bit over the top, don't you think?
editPictures of "significant" alumni and all the rest....
No, at least not compared to, for example, the Columbia University article. If I understand what this comment is trying to say.Indefatigable2 talk 19:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Location of Good Article review
editDrown Soda, was the GA review done on another talk page or work page? I ask because I don't see any commentary from the reviewer in the "GA Review" section transcluded above. If so, could you copy and paste it to this talk page with a link to where it came from? Rjjiii (talk) 06:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Rjjiii: It has been a number of years so I cannot recall much about this—I do see there is no GA review on the talk page, which is abnormal. I see in my personal talk page archive that there were a couple of posts made by the reviewer, but not a review proper(?) -Drown Soda (talk) 06:23, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- That's okay, thanks for checking. It's not uncommon for new reviewers to place reviews somewhere other than the review's page. Sadly, the reviewing editor has passed, so there's no telling. Take care, Rjjiii (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Fordhams ridiculous tuition rate and rise
editThe school raises tuition incessantly under Tetlow and the virgin moderator of wiki won’t even allow it on the page Alexmilton1755 (talk) 00:42, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Tuition up 10% in two years
editThis should certainly be stated in the article Alexmilton1755 (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- This doesn't sound notable to me. It approximates inflation and likely tracks increases in expenses. It also appears to be WP:RECENTISM. The tone of the original edit also was decidedly non-neutral, violating WP:NPOV. I disagree with including it. Bahooka (talk) 01:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)