Wikipedia

Talk:Food politics

Latest comment: 4 months ago by 57.135.233.22 in topic "Big Food"
Learn more about this page

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 12 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JminnisTMCC.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:36, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Further reading?

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The name of the book comes from a quotation from Oscar Wilde, "nowadays people know the price of everything and the value of nothing". The book is about the politics of food politics: how market forces cause poverty and starvation.

99.181.142.231 (talk) 05:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed additions to Food politics page from graduate student/Food Policy/Tufts University

edit

Policy

edit
Main article: Food policy

Government policies around food production, distribution, and consumption influence the cost, availability, and safety of the food supply domestically and internationally. On a national scale, food policy work affects farmers, food processors, wholesalers, retailers and consumers. Commodity crops, such as corn, rice, wheat, and soy are most often at the heart of agricultural policy-making.[1] While most food policy is initiated domestically, there are international ramifications. Globally, protectionist trade policies, international trade agreements, famine, political instability, and development aid are among the primary influences on food policy.[2] Increasingly, climate change concerns and predictions are gaining the attention of those most concern with ensuring an adequate worldwide food supply.[3]

References

  1. ^ Wilde, Parke (2013). Food Policy in the United States: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-84971-428-0.
  2. ^ Messer, E (2007). "Conflict, Food Insecurity, and Globaliztion". Food, Culture and Society: An International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 2. 10: 297-315. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  3. ^ Perry, M (Nov. 29, 2005). "Climate change, global food supply and risk of hunger". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences. 1463. 350: 2125-2138. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

Food politics in the U.S.

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Technology

edit

As with many industries, the food industry has experienced growth in the capacity to produce food with the use of improved technologies. In developed countries, there are a number of important trends at play. Yields, or the amount of food harvested per acre of cropland, have increased less than one percent per year in since at least the 1960sCite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). This places a premium on quality yields from existing acres of farmland. In addition, the demand for meat products worldwide, expected to double by 2020, has accelerated a trend toward raising more animals on fewer acres of land.[1]

Farming of animals

edit

More intensive forms of animal farming have largely replaced traditional methods of raising pigs, cattle, poultry and fish for human consumption in the U.S. The increased development of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations have been associated with increased risk of foodborne illnesses from e.coli,[2] [3] environmental degradation, and increased emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and methane into the air. In addition to food safety and environmental concerns, organizations such as the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) have drawn attention to a range of practices that allow for the more efficient raising of animals for meat consumption, but which stress the animals, the land on which they are raised and the supply of food for human consumption. In a recent report on industrialized animal agriculture, HSUS called on people in Western countries to shift to a plant-based diet because half the world’s grain crop is used to raise animals for meat, eggs, and milk.[4] Fish farming has also come under scrutiny due to high concentrations of fish in smaller spaces than is experienced in the wild. For both land and water animals, the prophylactic use of antibiotics to promote growth and stem the spread of infection among the animals has also been questioned due to concerns that this practice may contribute to strains of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.[5]

Genetically modified foods

edit
Main article: Genetically modified organism

The use of genetically modified seeds to grow commodity and other crops in the U.S. has drawn criticism from organizations such as Greenpeace, The Non-GMO Project, and the Organic Consumers Association among others. Concerns center on both food safety and the erosion of agricultural biodiversity.Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). and work published by the American Medical Association’s Council on Science and Public Health.[6]

In the U.S., the political debate has centered primarily on whether or not to label products with GMO origins to better inform the public about the content of the foods they purchase. A statewide ballot question that would have mandated labeling of GMO products in California was defeated in 2012. The measure, known as Proposition 37 was leading by a wide margin in early polling[7] but was defeated after an advertising blitz bankrolled by Monsanto, the largest supplier of genetically engineered seeds, Kraft Foods, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo., and other large food business interests. The ballot question’s results were closely watched across the country as advocates for the measure hoped that it would pass and spur the federal government to mandate labeling of GMO foods as well.[8] In the wake of the labeling law proposal’s defeat, an organization called March Against Monsanto was formed to continue to keep alive the public debate about labeling GMO food products. In 2013, a ballot initiative that would have required labels on GMO foods sold in the state of Washington was defeated by voters, again after a campaign against the initiative was led by major food companies.[8]

Pesticide use

edit

Among the much-heralded impacts of the Green Revolution was the spread of technological advances in the development of pesticides to ensure higher crop yields. Health effects of pesticides have led to a number of regulatory and non-regulatory efforts to control potential harm to human health from these chemicals in the food supply. The US Environmental Protection Agency has jurisdiction of the use of pesticides in crop management and sets tolerances for trace amounts of pesticides that may be found in the food supply. About 12,000 samples of fruits and vegetables available to U.S. consumers are collected each year and tested for residue from pesticides and the results are published in an annual Pesticide Data Program (PDP) hosted by the USDA.[9] The non-profit organization, Environmental Working Group, publishes an annual list called the Dirty Dozen designed to direct consumers’ attention to the fruits and vegetables most contaminated by pesticide residue. In its annual Shopper’s Guide to Pesticides, the organization urges shoppers to continue eating fresh produce, but consider purchasing organically grown versions of the 12 most contaminated items.[10]

”Big food”

edit

Food manufacturing and processing is a heavily concentrated industry. The 10 largest food companies in the United States control more than half of all food sales domestically and a growing percentage of packaged food and beverage products on store shelves worldwide.[11] Ranked by food sales, Pepsico, Inc., is the largest food manufacturer in the U.S., followed by Tyson Foods, Nestle, JBS USA, and Anheuser-Busch, according to a 2013 list published by Food Processing magazine.[12] According to figures from the United States Census Bureau from 2007, the most highly concentrated food industries in the country included can sugar refining, breakfast cereals, bottled water, and cookie/cracker manufacturing using the 4-firm concentration ratio. Consolidation of this industry took place in the 1970s and 1980s through a series of mergers and acquisitions.[11]

“Big food” has come under fire not only because a small number of players are responsible for a large percentage of the food supply chain, but because of concerns about the links between the highly-processed foods they produce and the obesity epidemic both in the U.S. and worldwide.[13] The director general of the World Health Organization, in a speech given at the 8th Global Conference on Health Promotion in Helsinki, Finland in June of 2013, noted that the public health community’s efforts to combat chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension and cardiovascular disease are pitted against the economic interests of the powerful food industry. Several studies are exploring processed foods with high concentrations of sugar, refined carbohydrates, fat, salt and caffeine for addictive properties.[14]

Marketing and other strategies of the food industry have been compared to those of the tobacco industry at the height of its influence in the consumer marketplace.[15] [16] In response, the food industry has engaged in some voluntary efforts to improve the nutritional content of their foods. In 2005, General Mills announced a plan to ensure that all of its breakfast cereals contained at least eight grams of whole grain per serving.[17] In 2006, Campbell Soup Company announced an initiative to reduce sodium in its products by at least 25 percent. Due to slumping sales, Campbell’s acknowledged that it was adding more sodium back into some of its soups in 2011.[18]

Food movements

edit

A cultural backlash against an increasingly mechanized food industry has taken a number of different forms.

  • Local food is a loosely-defined term that describes a movement to shift food expenditures by individuals, families, community organizations, schools, restaurants, and other institutions from foods produced and shipped long distances by larger corporate entities to regional farmers and other local producers of food. Small farming interests, relatively heterogeneous products and short supply chains characterize local food markets, though there is no agreed-upon measure of the distances that constitute “local.” Community-supported agriculture is a mechanism for connecting consumers with local farmers.[19] Farm-to-table efforts are also part of the local food movement.
  • Slow Food is an international movement founded in Italy in 1986, with Slow Food USA established in 2000. The organization stands in opposition to “the standardization of taste and culture, and the unrestrained power of food industry multinationals and industrial agriculture.”[22]

Among those influential in the food movement in the United States are writers, including Michael Pollan and Marion Nestle, and celebrity chefs such as Alice Waters, Mario Batali and Jamie Oliver. Popular books and movies on contemporary topics in food include Fast Food Nation, The Omnivore's Dilemma and the documentary Food, Inc.. In 2011, the president of the American Farm Bureau Federation referred to this influential group as “self-appointed food elitists” and the Washington Post published an op-ed from Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, defending the work he and colleagues have done to improve food systems in the United States.[23]

Social justice

edit

While the production and distribution of food is primarily an economic activity, advocates for a variety of social justice concerns are increasingly aware of the role that food policy plays in issues of greatest concern to causes they espouse.

Biofuel mandates and food supply

edit
Main article: Food vs. fuel

The interests of varied sectors of the agricultural industry are not always in alignment Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). This led to increased pressure on the federal government from some domestic farmers[24] and international anti-hunger organizations[25] to relax the Renewable Fuel Standard that call for a portion of the US-grown corn supply to be set aside for ethanol production. Meat and poultry producers, both of whom rely on corn for animal feed and feared rising prices due to the drought conditions, accused the federal government of “picking winners and losers” with its ethanol policy while ethanol producers, many of whom are corn farmers, argued that price spikes would affect them as well and that ethanol production had been scaled back.[26]

Domestic food aid

edit

Offering government food assistance to the lowest income Americans dates back to the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt and has continued into the 21st century.[27] In FY 2011, the budget for the USDA Food and Nutrition Service, which is responsible for the major feeding programs, was $107 billion. The largest single food assistance program in the country is the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the provisions for which are contained in a Farm Bill that is re-authorized by Congress and signed by the president every five years. Benefits to SNAP recipients cost approximately $75 billion in 2012. Largely uncontroversial for most of its history, the SNAP program was targeted for major cuts by members of the House of Representatives in the 2012 Farm Bill re-authorization attempt.[28] House leaders also endeavored to separate the SNAP program from the Farm Bill, splitting the long-standing coalition of urban and rural legislators who traditionally backed the renewals of funding for the Farm Bill every five years.[29]

Increases in the size of the SNAP caseload during the early 2000s were associated with increases in the unemployment rate and with a number of policy changes made to the program in many states.[30] A series of six measures to better understand employment trends developed by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, three of which are more conservative estimates of unemployment and three of which define it more broadly, all showed correlations with SNAP participation. In particular, it was suggested that longer-term unemployment results in the heaviest utilization of SNAP benefits. Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). In fact, the House of Representatives’ version of the initial Food Stamp Act of 1964 prohibited using food stamps for the purchase of soft drinks, but the provision was not adopted.Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page).

In addition to advocacy work in Washington, D.C., on behalf of those in poverty, public awareness campaigns around the constraints faced by families receiving SNAP were launched. The food stamp challenge or SNAP challenge is one mechanism used by advocates such as Feeding America. Individuals are challenged to restrict food spending for a week to levels typical for families receiving SNAP benefits.[31]

Labor and immigration

edit

Hired farmworkers are among the most economically disadvantaged groups in the United States.[32] Farm labor statistics are published twice yearly by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, a division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and are compared with similar data from the prior year. In April of 2013, the number of workers hired by farm operators was 732,000. Field workers received an average pay of $10.92 per hour and livestock workers earned $11.46 hourly. Average hourly rates for field and livestock work have been on the rise since 1990.[33] Language barriers, fear of deportation, frequent re-locations, and lack of voting status have contributed to difficulties in organizing farm laborers to advocate for wage, benefit, and working condition reforms.[34]

The agricultural industry’s reliance on non-native workers has become part of the political debate over immigration policies and enforcement in the country. United States Department of Labor statistics from 2009 indicated that about 50 percent of hired crop workers were not legally authorized to work in the U.S., a figure that remained largely unchanged over the course of the prior decade.[32] During that same time period, intense debate took place in the nation’s capital regarding immigration policies and enforcement. Farm interests, concerned about access to a steady workforce, worked on Capitol Hill to secure their interests in the Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act of 2013. Provisions favored by the farm lobby included: “earned adjustments” that will allow for temporary legal immigration status based on past experience with the possibility of applying for permanent residency by continuing to work in agriculture for a set period of time; and a more flexible guest worker program for agricultural workers.[35]

In addition to farm labor, workers in the nation’s food service industry garnered attention in 2012 and 2013 with a series of strikes against fast food outlets demanding higher wages, better working conditions, and the right to form unions.[36] A study by the Labor Center at the University of California, Berkeley in October of 2013 demonstrated that 52 percent of families of fast-food workers receive public assistance, in comparison to 25 percent of the workforce as a whole. According the study, full-time hours were not sufficient to compensate for low wages.[37]

Mem2020 (talk) 02:26, 19 December 2013 (UTC)mem2020Reply

References

  1. ^ Brooks, Cassandra. "Consequences of increased global meat consumption on the global environment -- trade in virtual water, energy & nutrients". Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  2. ^ "Fact Sheet: Escherichia coli 0157 In United States Feedlots" (PDF). USDA Animal Plant Health Inspection Service. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  3. ^ Comis, D (July 2003). "An Environmental Look at America's Feedlots". Agricultural Research.
  4. ^ "An HSUS Report: The Impact of Industrialized Animal Agriculture on World Hunger". The Humane Society of the United States. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  5. ^ Wallinga, D (July 10, 2013). "Head to Head: Does adding routine antibiotics to animal feed pose a serious risk to human health?". BMJ. 347, f4214. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. ^ "Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health: Labeling Bioengineered Foods" (PDF). American Medical Association. Retrieved 11/15/2103. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  7. ^ "California Business Roundtable and Pepperdine University Release Statewide Initiative Survey Results". Pepperdine University School of Public Health. 10/11/12. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  8. ^ a b Pollack, Andrew (11/7/2012). "After Loss, Fight to Label Modified Foods Continues". New York Times. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  9. ^ "PESTICIDE DATA PROGRAM (PDP)". USDA Agricultural Marketing Service. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  10. ^ [http://www.ewg.org/foodnews/summary.php "Executive Summary: EWG's 2013 Shopper's Guide to Pesticides in Produce"]. Environmental Working Group. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help); Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  11. ^ a b Lyson, T (2000). "Stalking the wily multinational: power and control in the US food system". Agric Human Values. 17: 199-208. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  12. ^ "Food Processing Top 100 2013". Food Processing magazine. Retrieved 12/5/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  13. ^ Stuckler, D (2012). "Big food, big systems, and global health". PLoS Medicine. 96(6):e1001242. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  14. ^ Ifland, JR (2009). "Refined Food addiction: A classic substance disorder". Medical Hypothesis. 72 (5): 518-526. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  15. ^ Gearhardt, AN (2011). "The Addiction Potential of Hyperpalatable Foods". Current Drug Abuse Reviews. 4: 140-150. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  16. ^ Brownell, KD (2009). "The perils of ignoring history: Big tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is big food?". The Millbank Quarterly. 87 (1): 259-294. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  17. ^ "General Mills goes whole grains Cereal maker will shift kids cereals to healthier whole grains by early 2005". CNN Money. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  18. ^ Nestle, Marion. "Campbell Soup fights the salt wars". Food Politics (blog). Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  19. ^ Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues by Stephen Martinez, Michael S. Hand, Michelle Da Pra, Susan Pollack, Katherine Ralston, Travis Smith, Stephen Vogel, Shellye Clark, Loren Tauer, Luanne Lohr, Sarah A. Low, and Constance Newman. Economic Research Report No. (ERR-97) 87 pp, May 2010. http://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/err-economic-research-report/err97.aspx#.Uqx8RY2E7Fk.
  20. ^ "About Us". Meatless Monday. Retrieved 12/5/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  21. ^ Laestadium, LI (2013). "Meat consumption and climate change: the role of non-governmental organizations". Climatic Change. 120: 25-38. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ "Slow Food: The History of an Idea". Slow Food International. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  23. ^ Schlosser, Eric (April 29, 2011). "Why being a foodie isn't 'elitist'". Washington Post. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  24. ^ Jegarajah, Sri. "Surging US Corn Prices Spark 'Food Versus Fuel' Debate". CNBC.com. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  25. ^ "US biofuel production should be suspended, UN says". BBC News. 8/10/2012. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  26. ^ "In Drought, a Debate Over Quota for Ethanol". New York Times. 8/16/2012. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  27. ^ "A Short History of SNAP". USDA Food and Nutrition Services. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  28. ^ Nixon, Ron (9/19/2013). "House Republicans Pass Deep Cuts in Food Stamps". New York Times. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  29. ^ Nixon, Ron (7/12/2013). "Split Among House Republicans Over How Deeply to Cut May Delay Farm Bill". New York Times. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  30. ^ Mabli, J, Ferrerosa, C. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Caseload Trends and Changes in Measures of Unemployment, Labor Underutilization, and Program Policy from 2000 to 2008 Final Report. Mathematica Policy Reserach, Inc., for USDA Food and Nutrition Service. October 18, 2010. http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/publications/PDFs/nutrition/SNAP_caseloads.pdf
  31. ^ "Taking the SNAP challenge". Feeding America. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  32. ^ a b "Farm Workers: Background". USDA Economic Research Service. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  33. ^ Farm Labor report. USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. April Hired Workers Down Over 2 Percent, Wage Rates Increase Over 4 Percent From Previous Year.|accessdate=11/15/2013|http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/current/FarmLabo/FarmLabo-05-21-2013.pdf
  34. ^ Cite error: The named reference Wilde was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  35. ^ "Agricultural Labor - Immigration Reform" (PDF). Working paper. American Farm Bureau Federations. Retrieved 11/15/2013. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  36. ^ Greenhouse, Steven (7/31/2013). "A Day's Strike Seeks to Raise Fast-Food Pay". New York Times. {{cite news}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  37. ^ Allegretto SA, Doussard M, Graham-Squire D, Jacobs K, Thompson D, and Thompson J. Fast Food, Poverty Wages: The Public Cost of Low-Wage Jobs inthe Fast-Food Industry. Berkeley, CA. UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education, October 2013. http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/publiccosts/fast_food_poverty_wages.pdf
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Food politics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Big Food"

edit
Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is kind of a loaded term, no? Usually the "big" prefix is used for some company or industry one disapproves of (a subjective value judgement). Maybe "Industrial Food Producer" or something similar is more neutral? 57.135.233.22 (talk) 14:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Food_politics&oldid=1238557387"