Talk:Efraín Juárez

Mexican player agrees to join Celtic

Is there some objection to the detail in this reliable citaton? Off2riorob (talk) 08:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/c/celtic/8820467.stm

"Celtic have completed the signing of Mexico right-back Efrain Juarez from UNAM Pumas for an undisclosed fee subject to a medical and work permit".

This citation has also been presented, I fail to see what User:Pointer1 isn't accepting here.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/spl/celtic/efrain-juarez-will-offer-celtic-versatility-as-mexicans-make-waves-1.1041498 "In Efrain Juarez, Celtic have signed one of the shining lights of Mexico’s ‘Golden Generation’, according to football experts in that country." July 15. Off2riorob (talk) 08:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Request reverting back to this position which has a BBC citation included in the edit that clearly is reliable and supports the content. Off2riorob (talk) 08:43, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The citation is in the article so what have I not accepted? The transfer is subject to him passing a medical and receiving a work permit so he is still a Pumas player. Pointer1 (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

He has signed for Celtic, we need to add that, this edit I have linked to clearly says he has to have a medical and get a permit, those are basically irrelevancies, he is in no way a Pumas player anymore. Off2riorob (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Excuse me, I see it is still in the article, there has been so much reverting of this article I got blinded. sorry. Off2riorob (talk) 09:13, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

[1]. Juarez officially became a Celtic player. -- DAVID1985 (talk) 13:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

So, uh, why is he not listed as a Celtic player?

As the title says, he's a Celtic player, he's with the team, why is he not listed as a Celtic player, and who is responsible?

What title states what? Have you read the article? Mexican star Juarez joins Bhoys in Seattle Celtic announced that he "he will undergo a medical in Seattle, while the club are in the process of finalising all documentation." No statements have been issued since. The transfer is not complete. Pointer1 (talk) 22:17, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

There have been lots of people trying to add this information in recently, who is blocking, or reverting, it, and why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyDudeThe MadTim (talk • contribs) 23:33, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Additionally, who requested that this article be 'semi-protected', and who authorised such a measure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyDudeThe MadTim (talk • contribs) 23:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

thanks for your honesty, huns/ ☘HappyDude The Mad Tim☘ craic 02:22, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Still no answer? ☘HappyDude The Mad Tim☘ craic 23:18, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

The page was protected by SlimVirgin (talk · contribs) at 06:07, 16 July 2010. The protection expired at 05:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC). Her justification was "vandalism per RfPP". Rockpocket 13:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Efraín Juárez. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121102061342/http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=276249&cc=5901 to http://soccernet.espn.go.com/gamecast?id=276249&cc=5901

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)