Talk:Dreams So Real

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified



Untitled

edit

Probably not that significant. They were a fine group, but they were well after "Athens" happened and were at the center of the scene for a relatively short time. They did get signed by a major record label, and they had a video that got some airplay on MTV, but, compared to their contemporaries, they didn't really manage to be terribly successful. Fine folks, and a fine band, but "significant" part of the Athens scene is maybe stretching things. Geogre 22:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Significant enough to be included in a documentary on the Athens scene. I'll be rewriting this shortly. --badlydrawnjeff talk 03:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
If you're talking about Athens, GA Inside and Out, it would be a huge mistake to assume that inclusion there signified much besides the film makers knowing and liking them. I was there and a working musician and "rival" at the time, and it's simply empirically true that many of the acts in that film were tiny figures. The Barbecue Killers? Nah. Flat Duo Jets? Dexter was everywhere, and he was personally at every scene you could think of, but the band itself wasn't really very instrumental or influential. Again, I'm not trying to say the band was nobody or nowhere. They were good, and they had some success, but they were hardly Pylon or even Driv'n and Cry'n in terms of being important hubs of the scene. I.e. were they a band that other bands all knew and were members of? Nah. Were they an unofficial houseband? Nah. Were they somewhat aloof from the locals? Yeah. Geogre 12:36, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I am. i'm certainly not putting them above, say, Pylon or Love Tractor, but there's more than enough that I have in books and docu-stuff to make a good article. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well, Love Tractor has the best claim to being the center of Athens, along with Pylon (what with the "Hornets Attack Victor Mature's Face" (REM + Love Tractor) and "Wheel of Cheese" (Love Tractor switching instruments, plus Jack Heard/Thomas Dolby (secretly)) stuff), but Dreams So Real were.... It's hard to explain. They really kept to themselves and moved away from the local scene as quickly as they could. They appeared very quickly with that sound and then kind of disappeared just as quickly. I have no doubt that a good article can be made. I only objected to "significant part of the scene." They were a significant band, but not really significant to the scene. At least they were actually from Athens, unlike a number of other "Athens" bands (Guadalcanal Diary and Indigo Girls, e.g.). Geogre 15:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
I now see that the problem is with the embedded link. I'll risk an easter egg to make the lead sentence a bit more neutral. Again, no quarrel with the band. I met them. They were nice guys. No quarrel with their album being successful. I just don't recall their being particularly central to the "scene," such as there was one. Geogre 00:55, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oh, and if anyone wants a list of unsung Athens bands from 81-90, I can provide a few that still haven't got articles. It's just that we really need to pass WP:MUSIC (and these guys do), while Pylon never recorded on a major label (by design) and yet were so much the heart of Athens as to be absolutely the most important independent label band in history, just about. Geogre 00:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Dreamssoreal.jpg

edit
 

Image:Dreamssoreal.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dreams So Real. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply