Talk:Douglas Feaver

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Douglas Feaver is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled]

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

This is not really a suitable Encyclopaedia article. I suspect it has been cut and pasted from one source, and needs other sources. Bashereyre (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

This looks remarkably like a very lightly edited version of Donald Gray's obituary of Feaver - especially the opening sentence. The reference to Eric Abbott as "notably wise and generous" is a dead giveaway: I've quoted Donald on Abbott myself (though not on Wikipedia). That said, though, it's handy to have it somewhere accessible. Kranf (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

It may be handy, but if it is copyrighted, it should not be here. Do you have access to that Donald Gray source? I could not locate it online. Superp (talk) 11:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ive asked Kranf to find the source, If this is copyvio then it should be deleted or very hastily replaced. Victuallers (talk) 10:56, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Although this is word for word, so it has to go Victuallers (talk) 11:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Douglas Feaver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814031331/http://www.stmarysnottingham.org:80/clergy61.html to http://www.stmarysnottingham.org/clergy61.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic