Talk:Midway International Airport/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:39, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   I repaired some dead links and tagged 8 dead links using WP:CHECKLINKS

   I see that that the links to [1] and [2], refs # 30 & 31 are live now, must have just been temporarily down. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC) Y

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Just some referencing issues as noted above. On hold for seven days, major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review if you will give me a little time I will clean up the references. -Marcusmax(speak) 02:14, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing, I have the article and review on my watchlist. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done; all marked sources either repaired or replaced. -Marcusmax(speak) 03:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

1. OK, that is good to go now, keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)