Talk:Cathedral (short story)

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.

Open to Interpretation as currently worded

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The current plot, motif, and theme sections are all open to interpretation. The summary section is also more of a response than a summary.130.101.162.84 (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit Request

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

EDIT REQUEST: I suggest we remove the sentence: 'With its publication Carver finally received the critical praise he had longed for.' Carver received much critical acclaim before Cathedral, and this suggests a dependence on critical acclaim that is reductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chronotopian (talk • contribs) 12:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Why the rating was changed from Low to Mid on "Importance scale"

This short story by Carver is one of his most famous, if not his most famous. It is certainly one of his most well-known stories. It's also the title story of last major collection. Arguably could be given a High rating, but does not have the notability outside literature classes in the way "Lolita" or "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest" does. Or if we stay with short stories, it may not have the notability of "The Most Dangerous Game" or "A Clean, Well-Lighted Place" (for example).

Add topic