Talk:Can You Ever Forgive Me?
(Redirected from Talk:Can You Ever Forgive Me? (film))
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 31 December 2018
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 31 December 2018
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus to move the film's article to the plain title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:25, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Can You Ever Forgive Me? (film) → Can You Ever Forgive Me? – Dab just links to this and one other page, so a hatnote per TWODABS is plenty but the other page is a redirect anyway, so this is clearly the main use of the title ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support very rare that there's no song with such an apparently generic title to expand the dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:34, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose - the film is based on the book of the same name. I see no primary, even if the book link is currently a redirect. I also see it being very likely the book is worthy of expansion into its own article. Also, the phrase is very commonplace - I am sure there must be other links to add to the DAB such as songs or albums. -- Netoholic @ 12:27, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support. The film has a substantial article, whereas the book is only a redirect. That makes it clear what the WP:PTOPIC is. Google supplies no evidence of any other title matches. Neither of the songs in AllMusic passes WP:NSONG (and indeed, neither is mentioned in WP, so there are no redirect targets). Narky Blert (talk) 17:16, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. If an article is written about the book, this can always be reconsidered. Station1 (talk) 09:25, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom, if an article about the book is created then it can be revisited which is the primary topic. Sock (
tocktalk) 23:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC) - Support because there is no article on the book at this point. Calidum 03:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.