Talk:California–Nevada Interstate Maglev

(Redirected from Talk:California-Nevada Interstate Maglev)
Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Article link

edit

Business Week article

maglev vs track upgrades

edit

How in the world can maglev be a good alternative to track upgrades if the problem with the track upgrades is that they are too expensive? AFAIK, maglev is even more expensive than building high quality track. Is there a source that can be cited for this claim? JNW2 (talk) 01:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

February 2012 update: project seems dead

edit

http://www.pe.com/local-news/transportation-headlines/20120121-southern-california-maglev-gone-but-high-speed-rail-remains.ece

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on California–Nevada Interstate Maglev. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply